Takahata N
Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):169-79. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.169.
Rates of molecular evolution at some loci are more irregular than described by simple Poisson processes. Three situations under which molecular evolution would not follow simple Poisson processes are reevaluated from the viewpoint of the neutrality hypothesis: concomitant or multiple substitutions in a gene, fluctuating substitution rates in time caused by coupled effects of deleterious mutations and bottlenecks, and changes in the degree of selective constraints against a gene (neutral space) caused by successive substitutions. The common underlying assumption that these causes are lineage nonspecific excludes the case where mutation rates themselves change systematically among lineages or taxonomic groups, and severely limits the extent of variation in the number of substitutions among lineages. Even under this stringent condition, however, the third hypothesis, the fluctuating neutral space model, can generate fairly large variation. This is described by a time-dependent renewal process, which does not exhibit any episodic nature of molecular evolution. It is argued that the observed elevated variances in the number of nucleotide or amino acid substitutions do not immediately call for positive Darwinian selection in molecular evolution.
某些基因座的分子进化速率比简单泊松过程所描述的更不规则。从中性假说的角度重新评估了分子进化不遵循简单泊松过程的三种情况:基因中的伴随或多重替换、有害突变和瓶颈的耦合效应导致的随时间波动的替换率,以及连续替换导致的对基因(中性空间)选择性约束程度的变化。这些原因是谱系非特异性的这一共同潜在假设排除了突变率本身在谱系或分类群之间系统变化的情况,并严重限制了谱系间替换数量的变化程度。然而,即使在这种严格条件下,第三个假说,即波动中性空间模型,也能产生相当大的变化。这由一个时间依赖的更新过程来描述,该过程不表现出分子进化的任何 episodic 性质。有人认为,观察到的核苷酸或氨基酸替换数量的升高方差并不立即意味着分子进化中存在正达尔文选择。