Suppr超能文献

患者对改用通用干粉吸入器的看法——通过旅程图增加理解。

Patient Perceptions of Switching to a Generic Dry Powder Inhaler - Increased Understanding Through Journey Mapping.

机构信息

Center for Communication Science, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Aug 6;17:1751-1768. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S362696. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This qualitative study explored patients' attitudes about and perceptions of generic dry powder inhaler (DPI) substitution for the brand product and patients' views of generic product quality, efficacy, design, and usability.

METHODS

Forty COPD and asthma patients (36 adults, four adolescents), who were actively using a brand DPI product, participated in one of six focus groups. Participants completed a journey mapping exercise to assess attitudes and opinions about a scenario where they refill their prescription and unexpectedly receive a generic DPI instead of their brand DPI. The focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

The hypothetical scenario of unexpectedly receiving a generic DPI elicited mixed feelings including: happiness and relief about potential cost savings, confusion, disappointment, anger, and/or frustration with the unexpected switch. Participants in most groups anticipated anxiety or hesitation in using the generic DPI due to concerns about potential differences in usability, uncertainty about correct use, and questions about efficacy. Participants across all groups said they would ask a pharmacist or healthcare provider for information or answers to their questions, and some participants said they would use online resources. When participants held the brand and generic DPI devices, most preferred the brand DPI device and found it easier, less cumbersome, or more convenient to use (due to size and weight). However, many participants reiterated that the potential reduced cost of the generic DPI would be a primary factor in their decision-making related to generic DPI substitution for their brand DPI.

CONCLUSION

Patients experienced a mixture of positive and negative feelings when faced with an unexpected generic DPI substitution. Some patients have doubts about their ability to successfully navigate differences in generic device design, and most expressed the desire to participate in discussions and decision-making with their HCP about generic DPI sameness and substitution.

摘要

目的

本定性研究探讨了患者对通用干粉吸入器(DPI)替代品牌产品的态度和看法,以及患者对通用产品质量、疗效、设计和易用性的看法。

方法

40 名 COPD 和哮喘患者(36 名成人,4 名青少年)正在使用品牌 DPI 产品,他们参加了 6 个焦点小组中的一个。参与者完成了一次旅程图练习,以评估他们在填写处方并意外收到通用 DPI 而不是品牌 DPI 时的态度和意见。焦点小组进行了录音、转录,并进行了主题分析。

结果

意外收到通用 DPI 的假设情景引起了混合情绪,包括:对潜在节省成本的高兴和欣慰、困惑、失望、愤怒和/或沮丧。大多数小组的参与者预计会因为担心使用不便、对正确使用的不确定性以及对疗效的质疑,在使用通用 DPI 时感到焦虑或犹豫。所有小组的参与者都说他们会向药剂师或医疗保健提供者询问信息或答案,一些参与者表示他们会使用在线资源。当参与者拿起品牌和通用 DPI 设备时,大多数人更喜欢品牌 DPI 设备,并且发现它更易用、不那么麻烦或更方便(由于尺寸和重量)。然而,许多参与者反复强调,通用 DPI 的潜在降低成本将是他们决定是否替代品牌 DPI 的主要因素。

结论

当患者面临意外的通用 DPI 替代时,他们会产生一系列积极和消极的情绪。一些患者对自己成功适应通用设备设计差异的能力存在疑虑,大多数患者表示希望与他们的 HCP 就通用 DPI 的相同性和替代问题进行讨论和决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9ea/9367651/ab5b2c1ba427/COPD-17-1751-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验