Wang Ran, Wen Zhao-Yan, Liu Fang-Hua, Wei Yi-Fan, Xu He-Li, Sun Ming-Li, Zhao Yu-Hong, Gong Ting-Ting, Wang Hui-Han, Wu Qi-Jun
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Front Nutr. 2022 Jul 27;9:891936. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.891936. eCollection 2022.
Epidemiological studies have suggested that dietary acid load (DAL) might be related to the risk and prognosis of cancer, whereas the evidence is contentious. Several high-quality observational studies have been published following a prior systematic review with only one study included. Consequently, we conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to comprehensively investigate the relationship between DAL and cancer risk and prognosis. A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to 26 October 2021. Summary relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects model. Publication bias, subgroup, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were also conducted. Ten observational studies (six cohorts and four case-control studies) with 227,253 participants were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The summary RRs revealed a statistically significant associations between DAL and cancer risk (RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.23-2.05, = 71.9%, = 7) and prognosis (RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.10-2.13, = 77.1%, = 3). No evidence of publication bias was observed in the current analysis. Positive associations were observed in most subgroup analyses stratified by predefined factors, including region, study design, study quality, study population, participants' gender, age of participants, cancer type, DAL assessment indicator, and adjustment of potential confounding parameters. No evidence of heterogeneity between subgroups was indicated by meta-regression analyses. The high DAL might be associated with an increased risk of cancer, as well as a poor prognosis of cancer. More high-quality prospective studies are warranted to further determine the associations between DAL and risk and prognosis for specific cancers.
流行病学研究表明,饮食酸负荷(DAL)可能与癌症风险及预后相关,然而证据存在争议。此前进行的一项系统评价仅纳入了一项研究,之后又发表了几项高质量的观察性研究。因此,我们开展了一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析,以全面探究DAL与癌症风险及预后之间的关系。我们在PubMed、Embase和Web of Science数据库中进行了从建库至2021年10月26日的系统文献检索。采用随机效应模型计算95%置信区间的汇总相对风险(RRs)。还进行了发表偏倚、亚组、meta回归和敏感性分析。本系统评价和荟萃分析纳入了10项观察性研究(6项队列研究和4项病例对照研究),共227,253名参与者。汇总RRs显示,DAL与癌症风险(RR = 1.58,95% CI = 1.23 - 2.05,I² = 71.9%,P = 7)及预后(RR = 1.53,95% CI = 1.10 - 2.13,I² = 77.1%,P = 3)之间存在统计学显著关联。本次分析未观察到发表偏倚的证据。在按预定义因素分层的大多数亚组分析中均观察到正相关,这些因素包括地区、研究设计、研究质量、研究人群、参与者性别、参与者年龄、癌症类型、DAL评估指标以及潜在混杂参数的调整。meta回归分析未显示亚组间存在异质性的证据。高DAL可能与癌症风险增加以及癌症预后不良相关。需要更多高质量的前瞻性研究来进一步确定DAL与特定癌症的风险及预后之间的关联。