Mehranfar Sanaz, Jalilpiran Yahya, Rahimi Haleh, Jafari Alireza, Setayesh Leila, Clark Cain C T, Faghih Shiva
Department of community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Science and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Students' Scientific Research Center (SSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 Mar 8;44(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-00811-8.
Conflicting results exist regarding the associations between dietary acid load (DAL) and cancer risk. This study aimed to investigate the association between DAL and the odds of prostate cancer (PC) in the Iranian population.
One hundred and twenty participants (60 controls and 60 newly diagnosed PC patients) engaged in a hospital-based case-control study conducted from April to September 2015. A validated, 160-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to assess usual dietary intakes. DAL was calculated using potential renal acid load (PRAL) and net endogenous acid production (NEAP). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs).
Both PRAL (OR = 5.44; 95% CI = 2.09-14.17) and NEAP (OR = 4.88; 95% CI = 2.22-13.41) were associated with increased odds of PC in the crude model. After adjusting for potential confounders (energy intake, smoking, physical activity, ethnicity, job, education, and medication use), being in the third category of PRAL (OR = 3.42; 95% CI = 1.11-8.65) and NEAP (OR = 3.88; 95% CI = 1.26-9.55) were significantly associated with increased odds of PC.
Our findings suggest that dietary acid load may be linked to an increased risk of PC; however, further prospective studies with larger sample sizes and longer durations are necessary to validate these findings.
关于饮食酸负荷(DAL)与癌症风险之间的关联,存在相互矛盾的结果。本研究旨在调查伊朗人群中DAL与前列腺癌(PC)发病几率之间的关联。
2015年4月至9月,120名参与者(60名对照者和60名新诊断的PC患者)参与了一项基于医院的病例对照研究。使用经过验证的160项半定量食物频率问卷(FFQ)评估日常饮食摄入量。采用潜在肾酸负荷(PRAL)和净内源性酸生成(NEAP)计算DAL。进行多因素逻辑回归以估计比值比(OR)。
在粗模型中,PRAL(OR = 5.44;95%CI = 2.09 - 14.17)和NEAP(OR = 4.88;95%CI = 2.22 - 13.41)均与PC发病几率增加相关。在对潜在混杂因素(能量摄入、吸烟、身体活动、种族、工作、教育和药物使用)进行调整后,处于PRAL第三类别(OR = 3.42;95%CI = 1.11 - 8.65)和NEAP第三类别(OR = 3.88;95%CI = 1.26 - 9.55)与PC发病几率增加显著相关。
我们的研究结果表明,饮食酸负荷可能与PC风险增加有关;然而,需要进一步开展更大样本量、更长时间的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现。