• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定量脑电图参数可通过机器学习方法提高非创伤性神经重症监护病房患者预后的预测价值。

Quantitative EEG parameters can improve the predictive value of the non-traumatic neurological ICU patient prognosis through the machine learning method.

作者信息

Tian Jia, Zhou Yi, Liu Hu, Qu Zhenzhen, Zhang Limiao, Liu Lidou

机构信息

Neurocritical Care Unit, Department of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.

Department of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2022 Jul 28;13:897734. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.897734. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2022.897734
PMID:35968284
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9366714/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Better outcome prediction could assist in reliable classification of the illnesses in neurological intensive care unit (ICU) severity to support clinical decision-making. We developed a multifactorial model including quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) parameters for outcome prediction of patients in neurological ICU.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed neurological ICU patients from November 2018 to November 2021. We used 3-month mortality as the outcome. Prediction models were created using a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) based on QEEG parameters, APACHEII score, and clinically relevant features. Additionally, we compared our best models with APACHEII score and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). The DeLong test was carried out to compare the ROC curves in different models.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients were included and divided into a training set (n=80) and a validation set ( = 30). The best performing model had an AUC of 0.85 in the training set and an AUC of 0.82 in the validation set, which were better than that of GCS (training set 0.64, validation set 0.61). Models in which we selected only the 4 best QEEG parameters had an AUC of 0.77 in the training set and an AUC of 0.71 in the validation set, which were similar to that of APACHEII (training set 0.75, validation set 0.73). The models also identified the relative importance of each feature.

CONCLUSION

Multifactorial machine learning models using QEEG parameters, clinical data, and APACHEII score have a better potential to predict 3-month mortality in non-traumatic patients in neurological ICU.

摘要

背景

更好的预后预测有助于对神经重症监护病房(ICU)患者的病情严重程度进行可靠分类,以支持临床决策。我们开发了一种多因素模型,包括定量脑电图(QEEG)参数,用于预测神经ICU患者的预后。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2018年11月至2021年11月期间入住神经ICU的患者。以3个月死亡率作为预后指标。基于QEEG参数、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHEII)评分和临床相关特征,使用线性判别分析(LDA)创建预测模型。此外,我们将最佳模型与APACHEII评分和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)进行比较。采用德龙检验比较不同模型的ROC曲线。

结果

共纳入110例患者,分为训练集(n=80)和验证集(n=30)。表现最佳的模型在训练集中的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.85,在验证集中的AUC为0.82,优于GCS(训练集0.64,验证集0.61)。仅选择4个最佳QEEG参数的模型在训练集中的AUC为0.77,在验证集中的AUC为0.71,与APACHEII评分相似(训练集0.75,验证集0.73)。这些模型还确定了每个特征的相对重要性。

结论

使用QEEG参数、临床数据和APACHEII评分的多因素机器学习模型在预测神经ICU非创伤性患者3个月死亡率方面具有更好的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ba/9366714/314261ee598e/fneur-13-897734-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ba/9366714/df2b88be3234/fneur-13-897734-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ba/9366714/d467949cf087/fneur-13-897734-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ba/9366714/c44d4c4a2302/fneur-13-897734-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ba/9366714/314261ee598e/fneur-13-897734-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ba/9366714/df2b88be3234/fneur-13-897734-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ba/9366714/d467949cf087/fneur-13-897734-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ba/9366714/c44d4c4a2302/fneur-13-897734-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ba/9366714/314261ee598e/fneur-13-897734-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantitative EEG parameters can improve the predictive value of the non-traumatic neurological ICU patient prognosis through the machine learning method.定量脑电图参数可通过机器学习方法提高非创伤性神经重症监护病房患者预后的预测价值。
Front Neurol. 2022 Jul 28;13:897734. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.897734. eCollection 2022.
2
Predicting outcome in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury using electroencephalography.使用脑电图预测中重度创伤性脑损伤患者的预后。
Crit Care. 2019 Dec 11;23(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2656-6.
3
Quantitative EEG Parameters for Prediction of Outcome in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Development Study.用于预测重度创伤性脑损伤预后的定量脑电图参数:开发研究。
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2018 Jul;49(4):248-257. doi: 10.1177/1550059417742232. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
4
A comparison of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) score and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) in predictive modelling in traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤预测模型中无反应性全面量表(FOUR)评分与格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)的比较
Br J Neurosurg. 2016;30(2):211-20. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2016.1161173. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
5
Establishment of ICU Mortality Risk Prediction Models with Machine Learning Algorithm Using MIMIC-IV Database.使用MIMIC-IV数据库通过机器学习算法建立重症监护病房死亡率风险预测模型
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 24;12(5):1068. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051068.
6
[Comparison of simplified acute physiology score III and other scoring systems in prediction of 28-day prognosis in patients with severe sepsis].[简化急性生理学评分III与其他评分系统对严重脓毒症患者28天预后预测的比较]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Jun;27(6):454-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2015.06.008.
7
Explainable Machine-Learning Model for Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in Septic Patients Requiring Intensive Care Unit Readmission.用于预测需要再次入住重症监护病房的脓毒症患者院内死亡率的可解释机器学习模型
Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Aug;11(4):1695-1713. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00671-3. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
8
The revised Cerebral Recovery Index improves predictions of neurological outcome after cardiac arrest.修订后的脑复苏指数可改善心搏骤停后神经功能预后的预测。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Dec;129(12):2557-2566. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
9
COVID-19 ICU mortality prediction: a machine learning approach using SuperLearner algorithm.新型冠状病毒肺炎重症监护病房死亡率预测:一种使用超级学习器算法的机器学习方法。
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2021 Sep 1;1(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s44158-021-00002-x.
10
[Comparison of the accuracy of predicting poor outcome of coma after cardiopulmonary resuscitation with two kinds of electroencephalogram techniques].[两种脑电图技术预测心肺复苏后昏迷不良预后的准确性比较]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Jun;30(6):554-557. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.06.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Cyclic Alternating Patterns of Encephalopathy (CAPE) in Acute Brain Injury Through a Quantitative Electroencephalogram (QEEG) Perspective: A Case Series.从定量脑电图(QEEG)角度看急性脑损伤中的脑病周期性交替模式(CAPE):病例系列
Cureus. 2025 Jan 14;17(1):e77436. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77436. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Neuromonitoring of Pediatric and Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients: The Importance of Continuous Bedside Tools in Driving Neuroprotective Clinical Care.儿科和成人体外膜肺氧合患者的神经监测:持续床边工具在推动神经保护临床护理中的重要性。
ASAIO J. 2024 Mar 1;70(3):167-176. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002107. Epub 2023 Dec 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Beneficial Effect of Sodium Nitrite on EEG Ischaemic Markers in Patients with Subarachnoid Haemorrhage.亚硝酸钠对蛛网膜下腔出血患者脑电图缺血标志物的有益作用。
Transl Stroke Res. 2022 Apr;13(2):265-275. doi: 10.1007/s12975-021-00939-9. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
2
Standardized visual EEG features predict outcome in patients with acute consciousness impairment of various etiologies.标准化视觉脑电图特征可预测各种病因导致的急性意识障碍患者的预后。
Crit Care. 2020 Dec 7;24(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03407-2.
3
Relative Alpha Variability Changes Precede Alpha-Delta Ratio Changes in Cerebral Ischemia.
大脑缺血时相对阿尔法波变异性变化先于阿尔法-德尔塔波比值变化。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Nov;29(11):105262. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105262. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
4
Prediction of poor neurological outcome in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a systematic review.心搏骤停昏迷幸存者不良神经结局预测:系统评价。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Oct;46(10):1803-1851. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06198-w. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
5
EEG Biomarkers Related With the Functional State of Stroke Patients.与中风患者功能状态相关的脑电图生物标志物
Front Neurosci. 2020 Jul 7;14:582. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00582. eCollection 2020.
6
Low-Frequency Oscillations Are a Biomarker of Injury and Recovery After Stroke.低频振荡是中风后损伤和恢复的生物标志物。
Stroke. 2020 May;51(5):1442-1450. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028932. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
7
Standardized EEG analysis to reduce the uncertainty of outcome prognostication after cardiac arrest.标准化脑电图分析可降低心搏骤停后预后评估的不确定性。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):963-972. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05921-6. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
8
Predicting outcome in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury using electroencephalography.使用脑电图预测中重度创伤性脑损伤患者的预后。
Crit Care. 2019 Dec 11;23(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2656-6.
9
Quantitative EEG reactivity and machine learning for prognostication in hypoxic-ischemic brain injury.定量脑电图反应与机器学习在缺氧缺血性脑损伤中的预后评估。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Oct;130(10):1908-1916. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
10
Value of EEG reactivity for prediction of neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest: Insights from the Parisian registry.脑电图反应性对心脏骤停后神经功能预后预测的价值:来自巴黎注册研究的见解。
Resuscitation. 2019 Sep;142:168-174. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jun 15.