Martinez Kercher Vanessa M, Burton Damon, Pickering Michael A, Kercher Kyle
Department of Kinesiology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Department of Movement Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
Psychol Rep. 2024 Feb;127(1):124-141. doi: 10.1177/00332941221119413. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
The purpose of this study is to identify profiles based on the reasons adults have for being physically active. A secondary purpose was to examine how profiles differ on motivational regulation and physical activity (PA). A total of 1275 (46.5 ± 16.8 years) participants were solicited from a hospital-affiliated wellness center, social media promotions, and a research volunteer registry. The Reasons to Exercise (RE-2) scale, International PA Questionnaire, Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3, and demographic questionnaire were utilized to assess variables of interest with a cross-sectional survey. Using SPSS Version 26, K-cluster analysis was used to identify profiles based on the reasons for exercise that individuals identified as important. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to assess profile differences followed by ANOVA. Four profiles were derived based on reason for exercise scores: a multi-reason positive ( = 361), a multi-reason negative ( = 232), an autonomous-focused ( = 259), and a control-focused cluster ( = 382) ( < .001). These unique clusters differed significantly ( < .001) from each other with respect to motivation to be active and PA. The multi-reason positive cluster engaged in higher levels of total moderate and vigorous PA minutes/week compared to the other clusters. Therefore, adult's motivation for PA may be likely to be affected by a combination of different informal goals and valuing a number of goals that are both extrinsic/controlling (e.g., to look good) and autonomous/intrinsic (e.g., to feel good), may promote greater autonomous motivation regulation and greater PA levels than highly autonomous/intrinsic goals alone.
本研究的目的是根据成年人进行体育锻炼的原因来确定不同的类型。第二个目的是研究这些类型在动机调节和体育活动(PA)方面有何差异。我们从一家附属医院的健康中心、社交媒体推广以及一个研究志愿者登记处招募了总共1275名参与者(年龄46.5±16.8岁)。使用锻炼原因(RE - 2)量表、国际体育活动问卷、锻炼行为调节问卷 - 3以及人口统计学问卷,通过横断面调查来评估相关变量。使用SPSS 26版本,通过K聚类分析根据个体认为重要的锻炼原因来确定不同类型。采用多变量方差分析(MANOVA)评估类型差异,随后进行方差分析(ANOVA)。根据锻炼原因得分得出了四种类型:多原因积极型(n = 361)、多原因消极型(n = 232)、自主关注型(n = 259)和控制关注型(n = 382)(p <.001)。这些独特的类型在积极参与的动机和体育活动方面彼此存在显著差异(p <.001)。与其他类型相比,多原因积极型每周进行中度和剧烈体育活动的总时长更高。因此,成年人参与体育活动的动机可能会受到不同非正式目标的组合影响,重视一些外在/控制性(如为了看起来好看)和自主/内在性(如为了感觉良好)的目标,可能比仅高度重视自主/内在目标更能促进更强的自主动机调节和更高的体育活动水平。