Suppr超能文献

老年患者后路器械辅助脊柱手术的疗效:5项和11项改良衰弱指数的比较

Posterior Instrumented Spinal Surgery Outcomes in the Elderly: A Comparison of the 5-Item and 11-Item Modified Frailty Indices.

作者信息

Kweh Barry T S, Lee Hui Qing, Tan Terence, Liew Susan, Hunn Martin, Wee Tee Jin

机构信息

National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2024 Mar;14(2):593-602. doi: 10.1177/21925682221117139. Epub 2022 Aug 15.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort.

OBJECTIVES

To validate the most concise risk stratification system to date, the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5), and compare its effectiveness with the established 11-item modified frailty index (mFI-11) in the elderly population undergoing posterior instrumented spine surgery.

METHODS

A single centre retrospective review of posterior instrumented spine surgeries in patients aged 65 years and older was conducted. The primary outcome was rate of post-operative major complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥ 4). Secondary outcome measures included rate of all complications, 6-month mortality and surgical site infection. Multi-variate analysis was performed and adjusted receiver operating characteristic curves were generated and compared by DeLong's test. The indices were correlated with Spearman's rho.

RESULTS

272 cases were identified. The risk of major complications was independently associated with both the mFI-5 (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.01-3.55, = .047) and mFI-11 (OR 3.73, 95% CI 1.90-7.30, = .000). Both the mFI-5 and mFI-11 were statistically significant predictors of risk of all complications ( = .007 and = .003), surgical site infection ( = .011 and = .003) and 6-month mortality ( = .031 and = .000). Adjusted ROC curves determined statistically similar c-statistics for major complications (.68 vs .68, = .64), all complications (.66 vs .64, = .10), surgical site infection (.75 vs .75, = .76) and 6-month mortality (.83 vs .81, = .21). The 2 indices correlated very well with a Spearman's rho of .944.

CONCLUSIONS

The mFI-5 and mFI-11 are equally effective predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality in this population. The brevity of the mFI-5 is advantageous in facilitating its daily clinical use.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

目的

验证迄今为止最简洁的风险分层系统——5项改良虚弱指数(mFI-5),并在接受后路脊柱内固定手术的老年人群中,将其有效性与已确立的11项改良虚弱指数(mFI-11)进行比较。

方法

对65岁及以上患者的后路脊柱内固定手术进行单中心回顾性研究。主要结局是术后严重并发症发生率(Clavien-Dindo分类≥4级)。次要结局指标包括所有并发症发生率、6个月死亡率和手术部位感染率。进行多变量分析,并生成调整后的受试者工作特征曲线,通过德朗检验进行比较。各指数采用Spearman等级相关分析。

结果

共纳入272例病例。严重并发症风险与mFI-5(比值比1.89,95%置信区间1.01 - 3.55,P = 0.047)和mFI-11(比值比3.73,95%置信区间1.90 - 7.30,P = 0.000)均独立相关。mFI-5和mFI-11均为所有并发症风险(P = 0.007和P = 0.003)、手术部位感染(P = 0.011和P = 0.003)及6个月死亡率(P = 0.031和P = 0.000)的统计学显著预测指标。调整后的ROC曲线显示,严重并发症(曲线下面积0.68对0.68,P = 0.64)、所有并发症(曲线下面积0.66对0.64,P = 0.10)、手术部位感染(曲线下面积0.75对0.75,P = 0.76)和6个月死亡率(曲线下面积0.83对0.81,P = 0.21)的c统计量在统计学上相似。两个指数的Spearman等级相关系数为0.944,相关性非常好。

结论

mFI-5和mFI-11在预测该人群术后发病率和死亡率方面同样有效。mFI-5的简洁性有利于其在日常临床中的应用。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验