• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Perceptions of various treatment approaches for adults and children with misophonia.对患有恐音症的成人和儿童的各种治疗方法的看法。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Nov 1;316:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.020. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
2
Misophonia and Hearing Comorbidities in a Collegiate Population.大学生群体中的恐音症与听力共病现象。
Ear Hear. 2024;45(2):390-399. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001435. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
3
A Preliminary Analysis of the Clinical Effectiveness of Audiologist-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Delivered via Video Calls for Rehabilitation of Misophonia, Hyperacusis, and Tinnitus.通过视频电话进行的听力学家提供的认知行为疗法对听觉过敏、听觉过敏和耳鸣康复的临床效果初步分析。
Am J Audiol. 2024 Jun 4;33(2):559-574. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJA-23-00254. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
4
Misophonia: An Evidence-Based Case Report.恐声症:基于证据的病例报告。
Am J Audiol. 2020 Dec 9;29(4):685-690. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-19-00111. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
5
A psychoacoustic test for misophonia assessment.一种用于评估恐音症的听觉心理学测试。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 26;11(1):11044. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90355-8.
6
Clinical characteristics of treatment-seeking youth with misophonia.寻求治疗的恐声症青年的临床特征。
J Clin Psychol. 2024 Jun;80(6):1405-1419. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23672. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
7
What sound sources trigger misophonia? Not just chewing and breathing.哪些声源会引发恐音症?不只是咀嚼和呼吸声。
J Clin Psychol. 2021 Nov;77(11):2609-2625. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23196. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
8
Exposure Therapy for Misophonia: Concepts and Procedures.恐声症的暴露疗法:概念与程序。
J Cogn Psychother. 2021 Aug 1;35(3):156-166. doi: 10.1891/JCPSY-D-20-00042.
9
["Ear rage": misophonia : Review and current state of knowledge].["耳部暴怒症”:恐音症:综述与当前知识状况]
HNO. 2022 Jan;70(1):3-13. doi: 10.1007/s00106-021-01072-7. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
10
Hyperacusis and Misophonia: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Measures.听觉过敏与恐音症:心理测量方法的系统评价
J Am Acad Audiol. 2022 Jul;33(7-08):417-428. doi: 10.1055/a-1896-5032. Epub 2022 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Considerations for Integrating Ethical Principles of Beneficence in the Development of Evidence-Based Interventions: The case of Pediatric Misophonia.在循证干预措施开发中融入善举伦理原则的临床考量:以儿童恐音症为例
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2025 May;53(5):625-637. doi: 10.1007/s10802-024-01247-0. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
2
Association between Chronic Misophonia-Induced Stress and Gastrointestinal Pathology in Children-A Hypothesis.儿童慢性恐音症诱发的压力与胃肠病理学之间的关联——一种假说
Children (Basel). 2024 Jun 7;11(6):699. doi: 10.3390/children11060699.
3
The unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders for misophonia: a pilot trial exploring acceptability and efficacy.针对恐音症的情绪障碍跨诊断治疗统一方案:一项探索可接受性和疗效的试点试验。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 9;14:1294571. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1294571. eCollection 2023.
4
An experimental examination of neurostimulation and cognitive restructuring as potential components for Misophonia interventions.对神经刺激和认知重构作为恐音症干预潜在组成部分的实验性研究。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Apr 1;350:274-285. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.120. Epub 2024 Jan 14.
5
A systematic review of treatments for misophonia.一项关于恐音症治疗方法的系统综述。
Pers Med Psychiatry. 2023 Jul-Aug;39-40. doi: 10.1016/j.pmip.2023.100104. Epub 2023 May 3.
6
Clinical characteristics, impairment, and psychiatric morbidity in 102 youth with misophonia.102 名恐音症青年的临床特征、障碍和精神发病情况。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Mar 1;324:395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.083. Epub 2022 Dec 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Initial Validation of the Duke Misophonia Questionnaire.《杜克氏恐音症问卷》的编制与初步验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 29;12:709928. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709928. eCollection 2021.
2
EMDR therapy for misophonia: a pilot study of case series.针对恐音症的眼动脱敏再处理疗法:一项病例系列的初步研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Sep 24;12(1):1968613. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1968613. eCollection 2021.
3
Transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy for misophonia in youth: Methods for a clinical trial and four pilot cases.跨诊断认知行为疗法治疗青少年恐声症:临床试验方法和四个试点案例。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Aug 1;291:400-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.027. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
4
Cognitive behavioral therapy for misophonia: A randomized clinical trial.针对恐音症的认知行为疗法:一项随机临床试验。
Depress Anxiety. 2020 Dec 18;38(7):708-18. doi: 10.1002/da.23127.
5
Misophonia: A scoping review of research.听觉过敏症:研究范围综述。
J Clin Psychol. 2019 Jul;75(7):1203-1218. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22771. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
6
The compatibility of clinical child mental health treatment and evidence-based treatment protocols.临床儿童心理健康治疗与循证治疗方案的兼容性。
Psychol Serv. 2020 Feb;17(1):25-32. doi: 10.1037/ser0000267. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
7
Cognitive behavioral therapy is effective in misophonia: An open trial.认知行为疗法对恐音症有效:一项开放性试验。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Aug 1;217:289-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
8
Ethical considerations in adherence research.依从性研究中的伦理考量
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Dec 5;10:2429-2435. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S117802. eCollection 2016.
9
Cognitive-behavioral therapy for 2 youths with misophonia.针对两名患有恐音症的青少年的认知行为疗法。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 May;76(5):573-4. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14cr09343.
10
The importance of considering parent's preferences when planning treatment for their children--the case of childhood obsessive-compulsive disorder.在为儿童规划治疗方案时考虑父母偏好的重要性——以儿童强迫症为例。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;55(12):1314-6. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12344. Epub 2014 Oct 27.

对患有恐音症的成人和儿童的各种治疗方法的看法。

Perceptions of various treatment approaches for adults and children with misophonia.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavior Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, 1977 Butler Blvd., Suite 4-100, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

International Misophonia Research Network, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2022 Nov 1;316:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.020. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.020
PMID:35970326
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9884516/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Misophonia is a complex disorder characterized by a heightened reaction to certain sounds and associated stimuli. While there is no uniformly accepted treatment to date, different intervention approaches are being investigated. Individual's perceptions of different misophonia treatment methods may affect compliance and satisfaction with treatment options. We sought to gather data on patient perceptions of currently available misophonia treatments.

METHODS

Using an online survey, we collected data about treatment preferences, treatment usage, and diagnosis history from parents of children with misophonia (N = 141) and adults with misophonia (N = 252).

RESULTS

Most respondents were not satisfied with misophonia treatments that they or their children had previously received. Audiologic interventions including active and passive noise cancelling and lifestyle modifications were rated as most appropriate for treatment of misophonia by both parent and adult respondents.

LIMITATIONS

Because of the descriptive nature of this study, we chose to use a completer-only approach to ensure the data reflect the true responses of participants, though this did result in a meaningful proportion of missing data. Participants were selected through convenience sampling and responses were self-reported. Individuals with more severe misophonia symptoms may be more likely to participate and complete a research survey.

CONCLUSIONS

Most interventions are considered inappropriate by parents of youth with misophonia and by adults with misophonia. This should be interpreted in the light of a general lack of misophonia-specific interventions. Findings suggest dissatisfaction with currently available treatments and an opportunity for development of effective treatment strategies corresponding to participants' preferences. Deeper understanding of treatment preferences has the potential to guide future treatment development.

摘要

目的

厌声症是一种复杂的障碍,其特征是对某些声音和相关刺激产生过度反应。虽然迄今为止还没有普遍接受的治疗方法,但不同的干预方法正在被研究。个人对不同的厌声症治疗方法的看法可能会影响对治疗选择的依从性和满意度。我们旨在收集有关患者对当前可用的厌声症治疗方法的看法的数据。

方法

我们使用在线调查收集了有厌声症的儿童的父母(N=141)和成年人(N=252)的治疗偏好、治疗使用情况和诊断史的数据。

结果

大多数受访者对他们自己或他们的孩子之前接受的厌声症治疗不满意。听觉干预,包括主动和被动降噪以及生活方式的改变,被父母和成年受访者评为最适合治疗厌声症的方法。

局限性

由于本研究的描述性性质,我们选择了仅完成者方法,以确保数据反映参与者的真实反应,尽管这确实导致了相当一部分数据缺失。参与者是通过方便抽样选择的,并且反应是自我报告的。患有更严重厌声症症状的个体可能更愿意参与并完成研究调查。

结论

大多数干预措施被有厌声症的青年的父母和成年厌声症患者认为不适当。这应该结合缺乏厌声症特异性干预措施来解释。研究结果表明,目前可用的治疗方法不满意,有机会根据参与者的偏好制定有效的治疗策略。对治疗偏好的更深入理解有可能指导未来的治疗发展。