Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/DahliaKenawy.
Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/RuthAckah.
Surgery. 2022 Oct;172(4):1126-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.06.038. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
This study aimed to characterize the types of intraoperative delays during robotic-assisted thoracic surgery, operating room staff awareness/perceptions of delays, and cost impact of delays on overall operative costs.
Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery cases from May to August 2019 were attended by 3 third-party observers to record intraoperative delays. The postoperative surveys were given to operating room staff to elicit perceived delays. Observed versus perceived delays were compared using the McNemar test. Direct costs and charges per delay were calculated.
Forty-four cases were observed, of which a majority were lobectomies (n = 38 [86%]). A total of 71 delays were recorded by observers, encompassing 75% of cases (n = 33), with an average delay length of 3.6 minutes (±5.3 minutes). The following delays were observed: equipment failure (n = 40, average delay length 5.0 minutes (±6.5 minutes), equipment missing (n = 15, 2.2 minutes [±1.4 minutes]), staff unfamiliarity with equipment (n = 4, 3.4 minutes [± 1.5 minutes]), and other (n = 12, 4.5 minutes [±5.3 minutes]). The detection rates for any intraoperative delay were consistently lower for all of the operating room team members compared with observers, including surgeons (34.3% vs 77.1%; P = .0003), first assistants (41.9% vs 74.2%; P = .0075), surgical technologists (39.4% vs 72.7%; P = .0045), and circulating nurses (41.18% vs 76.47% minutes; P = .0013). The average operating room variable direct cost of delays based on the average total delay length per case was $225.52 (±$350.18) and was 1.6% (range 0-10.6%) of the total case charges.
The lack of perception of intraoperative delays hinders operating teams from effectively closing the variable cost gaps. Future studies are needed to explore methods of increasing perception of delays and opportunities to improve operating room efficiency.
本研究旨在描述机器人辅助胸外科手术过程中的各种类型的手术延迟,手术室工作人员对延迟的感知/看法,以及延迟对总手术费用的成本影响。
2019 年 5 月至 8 月期间,由 3 名第三方观察员记录机器人辅助胸外科手术中的手术延迟。术后向手术室工作人员发放调查问卷,以了解他们对延迟的看法。使用 McNemar 检验比较观察到的和感知到的延迟。计算每个延迟的直接成本和费用。
共观察了 44 例手术,其中大部分为肺叶切除术(n=38[86%])。观察员共记录了 71 次延迟,涵盖了 75%的病例(n=33),平均延迟时间为 3.6 分钟(±5.3 分钟)。观察到的延迟类型包括设备故障(n=40,平均延迟时间 5.0 分钟(±6.5 分钟),设备缺失(n=15,2.2 分钟(±1.4 分钟)),工作人员不熟悉设备(n=4,3.4 分钟(±1.5 分钟)),以及其他(n=12,4.5 分钟(±5.3 分钟))。与观察员相比,所有手术室团队成员对任何手术延迟的检测率均较低,包括外科医生(34.3%比 77.1%;P=0.0003),第一助手(41.9%比 74.2%;P=0.0075),外科技术员(39.4%比 72.7%;P=0.0045)和巡回护士(41.18%比 76.47%;P=0.0013)。根据每个病例的平均总延迟时间,基于平均延迟时间的手术延迟的手术室可变直接成本为 225.52 美元(±350.18 美元),占病例总费用的 1.6%(范围 0-10.6%)。
手术室团队对手术延迟缺乏感知,这阻碍了他们有效地缩小可变成本差距。需要进一步研究以探索提高对延迟的感知和提高手术室效率的机会。