Hoppe Matthias Wilhelm, Brochhagen Joana, Tischer Thomas, Beitzel Knut, Seil Romain, Grim Casper
Movement and Training Science, Leipzig University, Jahnallee 59, 04109, Leipzig, Germany.
Clinic for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien, Erlangen, Germany.
J Exp Orthop. 2022 Aug 16;9(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s40634-022-00493-9.
The aim of this systematic review was to update the knowledge on risk factors and prevention strategies for shoulder injuries in overhead sports with special emphasis on methodological quality.
All methodological procedures were performed in line with a previous systematic review by Asker et al. (2018). The literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and SPORT-Discuss databases. Due to the risk of bias assessment, only studies with at least an acceptable methodological quality were included. A best-evidence synthesis was performed to clarify the evidence and direction of the risk factors and prevention strategies.
A total of nine studies were included in the data extraction process. One study had a high and eight studies had an acceptable methodological quality. Seven cohort studies investigated risk factors and two randomised controlled trails evaluated prevention strategies. Moderate evidence was found for two non-modifiable (playing position, gender) and three modifiable factors (shoulder rotational strength, scapular dyskinesia, shoulder prevention programme) that were associated with the shoulder injury risk. All further risk factors had moderate and no association with risk (shoulder rotational ROM, joint position sense) or limited (history of shoulder/elbow pain, age, training experience, training volume, school grade, playing level), and conflicting evidence (setting).
There is moderate evidence for two non-modifiable (playing position, gender) and three modifiable factors (shoulder rotational strength, scapular dyskinesia, shoulder prevention programme) being associated with the shoulder injury risk in overhead sports.
本系统评价的目的是更新关于上肢运动中肩部损伤危险因素和预防策略的知识,特别强调方法学质量。
所有方法学程序均按照Asker等人(2018年)先前的系统评价进行。在PubMed、谷歌学术、Cochrane和SPORT-Discuss数据库中进行文献检索。由于存在偏倚风险评估,仅纳入方法学质量至少可接受的研究。进行最佳证据综合以阐明危险因素和预防策略的证据及方向。
数据提取过程共纳入9项研究。1项研究方法学质量高,8项研究方法学质量可接受。7项队列研究调查危险因素,2项随机对照试验评估预防策略。发现有中等证据表明两个不可改变因素(比赛位置、性别)和三个可改变因素(肩部旋转力量、肩胛运动障碍、肩部预防计划)与肩部损伤风险相关。所有其他危险因素与风险的关联为中等或无关联(肩部旋转活动度、关节位置觉)或有限(肩部/肘部疼痛史、年龄、训练经验、训练量、年级、比赛水平),以及存在相互矛盾的证据(环境)。
有中等证据表明,在上肢运动中,两个不可改变因素(比赛位置、性别)和三个可改变因素(肩部旋转力量、肩胛运动障碍、肩部预防计划)与肩部损伤风险相关。