Suppr超能文献

地高辛与胺碘酮作为伴有心力衰竭证据的房颤患者紧急治疗的综合比较研究:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

An Integrative Comparative Study Between Digoxin and Amiodarone as an Emergency Treatment for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With Evidence of Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Zaki Hany A, Bashir Khalid, Iftikhar Haris, Salem Waleed, Mohamed Eslam Hussein, Elhag Helmy M, Hendy Mohamed, Kassem Ahmed Abdu O, Salem Emad El-Din, Elmoheen Amr

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.

Medicine, Qatar University, Doha, QAT.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Jul 13;14(7):e26800. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26800. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Abstract

The emergency treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) involves utilizing two strategies. The first strategy normally involves permitting the atrial fibrillation to persevere as the ventricular rate is controlled. The other method involves utilizing anti-arrhythmic drugs in cardioversion and attempting to maintain sinus rhythm. Different pharmacological treatments, including digoxin and amiodarone, have been used to manage AF. A literature review on amiodarone and digoxin in the treatment of AF among patients with heart failure (HF) has shown that both drugs have potential risks. Therefore, we are conducting this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of amiodarone and digoxin in the treatment of AF among patients with evidence of HF. A literature search of relevant articles was conducted on six electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar) from 2000 to 2022. The search yielded seven studies that had met the inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis of four studies showed that there was no significant difference in the reduction of heart rate after treatment with either amiodarone or digoxin (mean difference (MD): -5.44; 95% confidence interval (CI): -9.53 to -1.34; I = 25%; p = 0.26). On the other hand, the statistical analysis showed that amiodarone had a better effect on the conversion to sinus rhythm than digoxin (63% versus 35%, respectively). Based on evidence from our meta-analysis, the clinical effect of amiodarone and digoxin in the emergency treatment of AF on heart rate control was unclear. However, amiodarone has a significant impact on the restoration of sinus rhythm compared with digoxin and can be considered the first-line drug regimen in conversion to sinus rhythm for AF patients with evidence of heart failure. However, the use of amiodarone and digoxin is complicated by adverse events and all-cause mortality.

摘要

心房颤动(AF)的紧急治疗涉及两种策略。第一种策略通常是在控制心室率的同时允许心房颤动持续存在。另一种方法是在心脏复律中使用抗心律失常药物并试图维持窦性心律。包括地高辛和胺碘酮在内的不同药物治疗方法已被用于管理房颤。一项关于胺碘酮和地高辛治疗心力衰竭(HF)患者房颤的文献综述表明,这两种药物都有潜在风险。因此,我们正在进行这项系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较胺碘酮和地高辛治疗有心力衰竭证据患者房颤的有效性。对2000年至2022年期间的六个电子数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Medline、ScienceDirect、Cochrane图书馆和谷歌学术)进行了相关文章的文献检索。检索结果有七项研究符合纳入标准。我们对四项研究的荟萃分析表明,胺碘酮或地高辛治疗后心率降低方面没有显著差异(平均差(MD):-5.44;95%置信区间(CI):-9.53至-1.34;I² = 25%;p = 0.26)。另一方面,统计分析表明,胺碘酮在转为窦性心律方面比地高辛效果更好(分别为63%和35%)。基于我们荟萃分析的证据,胺碘酮和地高辛在房颤紧急治疗中对心率控制的临床效果尚不清楚。然而,与地高辛相比,胺碘酮对恢复窦性心律有显著影响,对于有心力衰竭证据的房颤患者,可被视为转为窦性心律的一线药物方案。然而,胺碘酮和地高辛的使用会因不良事件和全因死亡率而变得复杂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/078c/9372377/6db3145ebe1c/cureus-0014-00000026800-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验