Brain and Cognition, University of Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, PO box 3711, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1293-1305. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01717-4. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
Perception of simple temporal patterns has been shown to rely on accentuations in terms of intensity, pitch, or timbre, but also on grouping according to runs of the same events (intervals between successive sounds or light flashes) or significant gaps between them (Garner in The processing of information and structure. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1974; Preusser et al. in Am J Psychol 83(2):151-170 in 1970; Royer and Garner in Percept Psychophys 1(1):41-47, 1966; Royer and Garner in Percept Psychophys 7(2):115-120, 1970; Yu et al. in Atten Percept Psychophys 77(8):2728-2739, 2015). Here we investigate whether the run and gap principles can also account for participants' perceived start of complex rhythmic patterns. We also investigated the role of participants' musical training. Sixteen novices and 16 amateur musicians listened to rhythmic patterns and indicated perceived starting points by a single tap with a drumstick on electronic pads. Auditory patterns contained prominent gaps, runs, or a combination of the two for target intervals. We systematically varied task complexity in terms of the target durations of intervals constituting the patterns and overall tempos. Overall, run and gap principles proved to be useful grouping principles accounting for a large proportion (59.2%) of the selected starting positions underlining the universal relevance of these principles. Grouping principles were not as successful in predicting the perceived start of a rhythmic pattern compared to previous studies. Results indicate that additional grouping principles must be at play. Predictive power of the grouping principles varied depending on the structure of rhythmic patterns. For rhythmic patterns including longer intervals (i.e., longer gaps) the gap principle alone or in combination with the run principle showed the strongest predictive power. Novices and amateur musicians were similar in their usage of grouping principles suggesting that the underlying principles might be equally at the dispositions of performers and listeners.
人们已经发现,对简单时间模式的感知依赖于强度、音高或音色的强调,也依赖于根据相同事件的连续运行(连续声音或光闪烁之间的间隔)或它们之间的显著间隙进行分组(Garner 在《信息和结构的处理》中,劳伦斯·埃尔鲍姆,1974 年;Preusser 等人在《美国心理学期刊》83(2):151-170 年,1970 年;Royer 和 Garner 在《感知心理生理学》1(1):41-47 年,1966 年;Royer 和 Garner 在《感知心理生理学》7(2):115-120 年,1970 年;Yu 等人在《注意感知心理生理学》77(8):2728-2739 年,2015 年)。在这里,我们研究了运行和间隙原则是否也可以解释参与者对复杂节奏模式的感知起点。我们还研究了参与者音乐训练的作用。16 名新手和 16 名业余音乐家听节奏模式,并通过鼓棒在电子垫上敲击一次来指示感知起点。听觉模式包含突出的间隙、运行或两者的组合,用于目标间隔。我们系统地改变了任务复杂性,包括构成模式的间隔的目标持续时间和整体节奏。总的来说,运行和间隙原则被证明是有用的分组原则,占所选起始位置的很大比例(59.2%),强调了这些原则的普遍相关性。与之前的研究相比,分组原则在预测节奏模式的感知起点方面并不成功。结果表明,必须有其他分组原则在起作用。分组原则的预测能力取决于节奏模式的结构。对于包括较长间隔(即较长间隙)的节奏模式,单独的间隙原则或与运行原则结合使用显示出最强的预测能力。新手和业余音乐家在分组原则的使用上相似,这表明潜在的原则可能同样存在于表演者和听众的处置中。