• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能对大流行政策的评估。

Pandemic policy assessment by artificial intelligence.

机构信息

McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 16;12(1):13843. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17892-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-17892-8
PMID:35974068
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9379881/
Abstract

Mobility-control policy is a controversial nonpharmacological approach to pandemic control due to its restriction on people's liberty and economic impacts. Due to the computational complexity of mobility control, it is challenging to assess or compare alternative policies. Here, we develop a pandemic policy assessment system that employs artificial intelligence (AI) to evaluate and analyze mobility-control policies. The system includes three components: (1) a general simulation framework that models different policies to comparable network-flow control problems; (2) a reinforcement-learning (RL) oracle to explore the upper-bound execution results of policies; and (3) comprehensive protocols for converting the RL results to policy-assessment measures, including execution complexity, effectiveness, cost and benefit, and risk. We applied the system to real-world metropolitan data and evaluated three popular policies: city lockdown, community quarantine, and route management. For each policy, we generated mobility-pandemic trade-off frontiers. The results manifest that the smartest policies, such as route management, have high execution complexity but limited additional gain from mobility retention. In contrast, a moderate-level intelligent policy such as community quarantine has acceptable execution complexity but can effectively suppress infections and largely mitigate mobility interventions. The frontiers also show one or two turning points, reflecting the safe threshold of mobility retention when considering policy-execution errors. In addition, we simulated different policy environments and found inspirations for the current policy debates on the zero-COVID policy, vaccination policy, and relaxing restrictions.

摘要

移动控制政策是一种有争议的非药物控制大流行的方法,因为它限制了人们的自由和经济影响。由于移动控制的计算复杂性,评估或比较替代政策具有挑战性。在这里,我们开发了一个使用人工智能(AI)评估和分析移动控制政策的大流行政策评估系统。该系统包括三个组件:(1)一个通用模拟框架,该框架将不同的政策建模为可比的网络流量控制问题;(2)一个强化学习(RL)预言机,用于探索政策的上限执行结果;(3)将 RL 结果转换为政策评估措施的综合协议,包括执行复杂性、有效性、成本和收益以及风险。我们将该系统应用于现实大都市数据,并评估了三种流行的政策:城市封锁、社区隔离和路线管理。对于每种政策,我们生成了移动-大流行的权衡前沿。结果表明,最智能的政策,如路线管理,具有高执行复杂性,但从保留移动性中获得的额外收益有限。相比之下,社区隔离等中等水平的智能政策具有可接受的执行复杂性,但可以有效地抑制感染并在很大程度上减轻移动性干预。前沿还显示出一个或两个转折点,反映了考虑到政策执行错误时保留移动性的安全阈值。此外,我们模拟了不同的政策环境,并为当前关于零 COVID 政策、疫苗接种政策和放宽限制的政策辩论提供了启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a9a/9381764/14460e4409ff/41598_2022_17892_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a9a/9381764/16de0d46a56f/41598_2022_17892_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a9a/9381764/fecda22880c5/41598_2022_17892_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a9a/9381764/ccf2adf535cb/41598_2022_17892_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a9a/9381764/4c9373a61cf7/41598_2022_17892_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a9a/9381764/5fdf4959d7e9/41598_2022_17892_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a9a/9381764/14460e4409ff/41598_2022_17892_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a9a/9381764/16de0d46a56f/41598_2022_17892_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a9a/9381764/fecda22880c5/41598_2022_17892_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a9a/9381764/ccf2adf535cb/41598_2022_17892_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a9a/9381764/4c9373a61cf7/41598_2022_17892_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a9a/9381764/5fdf4959d7e9/41598_2022_17892_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a9a/9381764/14460e4409ff/41598_2022_17892_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pandemic policy assessment by artificial intelligence.人工智能对大流行政策的评估。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 16;12(1):13843. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17892-8.
2
PaCAR: COVID-19 Pandemic Control Decision Making via Large-Scale Agent-Based Modeling and Deep Reinforcement Learning.PaCAR:通过大规模基于代理的建模和深度强化学习进行 COVID-19 大流行控制决策。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Nov;42(8):1064-1077. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221107902. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
3
Estimating worldwide effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and population mobility patterns using a multiple-event study.利用多事件研究估计非药物干预对 COVID-19 发病率和人口流动模式的全球影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 21;11(1):1972. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81442-x.
4
Modeling economic impacts of mobility restriction policy during the COVID-19 pandemic.模拟 COVID-19 大流行期间流动性限制政策的经济影响。
Risk Anal. 2023 Nov;43(11):2344-2358. doi: 10.1111/risa.14099. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
5
Human mobility variations in response to restriction policies during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis from the Virus Watch community cohort in England, UK.人类在 COVID-19 大流行期间对限制政策的反应的流动性变化:来自英国 Virus Watch 社区队列的分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 14;10:999521. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.999521. eCollection 2022.
6
Social consequences of mass quarantine during epidemics: a systematic review with implications for the COVID-19 response.传染病大流行期间大规模隔离的社会后果:对 COVID-19 应对具有启示意义的系统评价。
J Travel Med. 2020 Nov 9;27(7). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa192.
7
A tale of lockdown policies on the transmission of COVID-19 within and between Chinese cities: A study based on heterogeneous treatment effect.中国城市内部和城市之间的新冠病毒传播的封锁政策的故事:基于异质处理效应的研究。
Econ Hum Biol. 2024 Apr;53:101365. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2024.101365. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
8
Exploring the Trade-Off Between Economic and Health Outcomes During a Pandemic: A Discrete Choice Experiment of Lockdown Policies in Australia.探索大流行期间经济与健康结果之间的权衡:澳大利亚封锁政策的离散选择实验
Patient. 2021 May;14(3):359-371. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00503-5. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
9
Investigating the effectiveness of re-opening policies before vaccination during a pandemic: SD modelling research based on COVID-19 in Wuhan.研究大流行期间疫苗接种前重新开放政策的效果:基于武汉 COVID-19 的 SD 建模研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 7;21(1):1638. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11631-w.
10
Impact of Governmental interventions on epidemic progression and workplace activity during the COVID-19 outbreak.政府干预措施对新冠疫情爆发期间疫情进展及职场活动的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 9;11(1):21939. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01276-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The power of artificial intelligence for managing pandemics: A primer for public health professionals.人工智能在管理大流行方面的力量:公共卫生专业人员入门指南。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2025 Jan;40(1):257-270. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3864. Epub 2024 Oct 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimising Lockdown Policies for Epidemic Control using Reinforcement Learning: An AI-Driven Control Approach Compatible with Existing Disease and Network Models.使用强化学习优化疫情防控的封锁政策:一种与现有疾病和网络模型兼容的人工智能驱动控制方法。
Trans Indian Natl Acad Eng. 2020;5(2):129-132. doi: 10.1007/s41403-020-00129-3. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
2
Epidemic Risk Assessment by a Novel Communication Station Based Method.基于新型通信站方法的疫情风险评估
IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng. 2021 Feb 11;9(1):332-344. doi: 10.1109/TNSE.2021.3058762. eCollection 2022 Jan.
3
A novel methodology for epidemic risk assessment of COVID-19 outbreak.
一种用于评估 COVID-19 疫情爆发风险的新方法。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 5;11(1):5304. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82310-4.
4
Reduction in mobility and COVID-19 transmission.减少流动性和 COVID-19 的传播。
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 17;12(1):1090. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21358-2.
5
State-level tracking of COVID-19 in the United States.美国的 COVID-19 州级追踪
Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 3;11(1):6189. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19652-6.
6
Efficacy of contact tracing for the containment of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19).接触者追踪在控制 2019 年新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)中的效果。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Oct;74(10):861-866. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214051. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
7
Economic and social consequences of human mobility restrictions under COVID-19.COVID-19 下人员流动限制的经济和社会后果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 7;117(27):15530-15535. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007658117. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
8
Prevalence of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection : A Narrative Review.无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染的流行情况:一项叙述性综述。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1;173(5):362-367. doi: 10.7326/M20-3012. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
9
Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing.量化 SARS-CoV-2 传播表明数字接触者追踪可控制疫情。
Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491). doi: 10.1126/science.abb6936. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
10
An investigation of transmission control measures during the first 50 days of the COVID-19 epidemic in China.中国 COVID-19 疫情前 50 天的传播控制措施调查。
Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491):638-642. doi: 10.1126/science.abb6105. Epub 2020 Mar 31.