• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证 McIntyre 审计工具,以衡量血液透析护士敏感指标。

Validation of the McIntyre Audit Tool to measure haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.

Kidney Health Service, Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, Australia.

出版信息

J Ren Care. 2023 Sep;49(3):191-197. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12441. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1111/jorc.12441
PMID:35975294
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nurse sensitive indicators measure the quality of nursing care. Although there are some haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators, there are currently no validated audit tools available to measure the indicators.

OBJECTIVES

To test the validity of the McIntyre Audit Tool.

DESIGN

This study used a descriptive observation design conducted over two phases to assess face and content validity.

PARTICIPANTS

An expert panel of haemodialysis nurses (n = 13).

METHODS

Face validity (phase 1) involved 13 nurses in two focus groups who reviewed the audit tool with qualitative data generated analysed to identify common themes. Phase 2 used a modified version of the audit tool to test for content validity for each item and then scale level content validity was calculated by combining all item scores.

MEASUREMENTS

Ten nurses rated 26 indicators in the audit tool using a 4-point Likert scale to assess each item for clarity, relevance, appropriateness, and ambiguity.

RESULTS

All 26-haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators achieved item content validity indices ranging from 0.825 to 1.00 with a scale content validity index average of 0.910. However, based on feedback from phase 2, 6 outcome indicators were removed from the audit tool to reduce staff burden and assist with ease of use. The final audit tool had an excellent average scale content validity index of 0.924.

CONCLUSIONS

The McIntyre Audit Tool to measure 20 haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators has been validated. It now requires feasibility and reliability testing before auditing the quality of haemodialysis nursing care.

摘要

背景

护士敏感指标衡量护理质量。虽然有一些血液透析护士敏感指标,但目前尚无经过验证的审核工具来衡量这些指标。

目的

测试 McIntyre 审核工具的有效性。

设计

本研究采用描述性观察设计,分两个阶段进行,以评估表面效度和内容效度。

参与者

血液透析护士专家小组(n=13)。

方法

表面效度(第 1 阶段)涉及两组 13 名护士的焦点小组,他们使用定性数据分析来审查审核工具,以确定共同主题。第 2 阶段使用修改后的审核工具测试每个项目的内容效度,然后通过合并所有项目得分来计算量表水平的内容效度。

测量

10 名护士使用 4 分李克特量表对审核工具中的 26 个指标进行评分,以评估每个项目的清晰度、相关性、适当性和模糊性。

结果

所有 26 个血液透析护士敏感指标的项目内容效度指数均在 0.825 到 1.00 之间,量表内容效度指数平均为 0.910。然而,根据第 2 阶段的反馈,从审核工具中删除了 6 个结果指标,以减轻员工负担并提高易用性。最终审核工具的平均量表内容效度指数为 0.924,非常好。

结论

已验证用于衡量 20 个血液透析护士敏感指标的 McIntyre 审核工具。现在需要对血液透析护理质量进行可行性和可靠性测试,然后才能进行审核。

相似文献

1
Validation of the McIntyre Audit Tool to measure haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators.验证 McIntyre 审计工具,以衡量血液透析护士敏感指标。
J Ren Care. 2023 Sep;49(3):191-197. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12441. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
2
Feasibility of the McIntyre audit tool for haemodialysis nurses.麦金太尔审计工具在血液透析护士中的可行性。
J Ren Care. 2024 Sep;50(3):192-200. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12477. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
3
Content Validity and Psychometric Characteristics of the "Knowledge about Older Patients Quiz" for Nurses Using Item Response Theory.基于项目反应理论的护士“老年患者知识测验”的内容效度和心理测量学特征。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Nov;64(11):2378-2383. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14476. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
4
Psychometric properties of End Stage Renal Disease-Adherence Questionnaire-Sinhalese version among patients receiving haemodialysis.终末期肾病-依从性问卷-僧伽罗语版在接受血液透析患者中的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 20;18(10):e0292938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292938. eCollection 2023.
5
The development of the Western Australian Haemodialysis Vascular Access Complexity instrument.西澳血液透析血管通路复杂度工具的开发。
J Ren Care. 2022 Sep;48(3):185-196. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12390. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
6
Mixed methods evaluation of a quality improvement and audit tool for nurse-to-nurse bedside clinical handover in ward settings.混合方法评价一种用于病房护士之间床边临床交接班的质量改进和审核工具。
Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Apr;40:80-89. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2017.12.013. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
7
Adaptation and validation of pediatric peripheral intravenous catheter insertion and care practices audit tools.儿科外周静脉导管插入与护理操作审核工具的改编与验证
Int J Nurs Sci. 2022 Mar 15;9(2):179-186. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.03.005. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
The Psychometric Properties and the Development of the Indicators of Quality Nursing Work Environments in Taiwan.台湾优质护理工作环境指标的心理测量特性与发展
J Nurs Res. 2016 Mar;24(1):9-20. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000106.
9
Development and validation of two versions of the Nurse-Patient Mutuality in Chronic Illness scale.开发并验证慢性疾病护患互信量表的两个版本。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Aug;79(8):3170-3182. doi: 10.1111/jan.15594. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
10
Development and content validation of the Burden of Documentation for Nurses and Midwives (BurDoNsaM) survey.护士和助产士文件负担(BurDoNsaM)调查问卷的编制与内容验证。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 May;76(5):1273-1281. doi: 10.1111/jan.14320. Epub 2020 Feb 28.