Lee Y J, Dewey W C
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco 94143.
J Cell Physiol. 1988 Jun;135(3):397-406. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041350306.
When CHO cells were treated either for 10 min at 45-45.5 degrees C or for 1 hr with 100 microM sodium arsenite (ARS) or for 2 hr with 20 micrograms/ml puromycin (PUR-20), they became thermotolerant to a heat treatment at 45-45.5 degrees C administered 4-14 hr later, with thermotolerance ratios at 10(-3) isosurvival of 4-6, 2-3.2, and 1.7, respectively. These treatments caused an increase in synthesis of HSP families (70, 87, and 110 kDa) relative to total protein synthesis. However, for a given amount of thermotolerance, the ARS and PUR-20 treatments induced 4 times more synthesis than the heat treatment. This decreased effectiveness of the ARS treatment may occur because ARS has been reported to stimulate minimal redistribution of HSP-70 to the nucleus and nucleolus. Inhibiting protein synthesis with cycloheximide (CHM, 10 micrograms/ml) or PUR (100 micrograms/ml) after the initial treatments greatly inhibited thermotolerance to 45-45.5 degrees C in all cases. However, for a challenge at 43 degrees C, thermotolerance was inhibited only for the ARS and PUR-20 treatments. CHM did not suppress heat-induced thermotolerance to 43 degrees C, which was the same as heat protection observed when CHM was added before and during heating at 43 degrees C without the initial heat treatment. These differences between the initial treatments and between 43 and 45 degrees C may possibly be explained by reports that show that heat causes more redistribution of HSP-70 to the nucleus and nucleolus than ARS and that redistribution of HSP-70 can occur during heating at 42 degrees C with or without the presence of CHM. Heating cells at 43 degrees C for 5 hr after thermotolerance had developed induced additional thermotolerance, as measured with a challenge at 45 degrees C immediately after heating at 43 degrees C. Compared to the nonthermotolerant cells, thermotolerance ratios were 10 for the ARS treatment and 8.5 for the initial heat treatment. Adding CHM (10 micrograms/ml) or PUR (100 micrograms/ml) to inhibit protein synthesis during heating at 43 degrees C did not greatly reduce this additional thermotolerance. If, however, protein synthesis was inhibited between the initial heat treatment and heating at 43 degrees C, protein synthesis was required during 43 degrees C for the development of additional thermotolerance to 45 degrees C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
当CHO细胞在45 - 45.5摄氏度下处理10分钟,或用100微摩尔/升的亚砷酸钠(ARS)处理1小时,或用20微克/毫升的嘌呤霉素(PUR - 20)处理2小时后,它们对4 - 14小时后进行的45 - 45.5摄氏度热处理产生耐热性,在10^(-3)等存活率下的耐热比分别为4 - 6、2 - 3.2和1.7。这些处理导致热休克蛋白家族(70、87和110千道尔顿)的合成相对于总蛋白合成增加。然而,对于给定程度的耐热性,ARS和PUR - 20处理诱导的合成量是热处理的4倍。ARS处理效果降低可能是因为据报道ARS刺激热休克蛋白70向细胞核和核仁的最小重新分布。在初始处理后用环己酰亚胺(CHM,10微克/毫升)或嘌呤霉素(PUR,100微克/毫升)抑制蛋白质合成在所有情况下都极大地抑制了对45 - 45.5摄氏度的耐热性。然而,对于43摄氏度的挑战,仅ARS和PUR - 20处理的耐热性受到抑制。CHM没有抑制热诱导的对43摄氏度的耐热性,这与在43摄氏度加热前和加热期间添加CHM且无初始热处理时观察到的热保护相同。初始处理之间以及43和45摄氏度之间的这些差异可能可以用以下报道来解释,即热导致热休克蛋白70向细胞核和核仁的重新分布比ARS更多,并且在42摄氏度加热期间无论有无CHM存在热休克蛋白70都可能发生重新分布。在耐热性形成后将细胞在43摄氏度加热5小时诱导了额外的耐热性,如在43摄氏度加热后立即用45摄氏度的挑战来测量。与不耐热细胞相比,ARS处理的耐热比为10,初始热处理的耐热比为8.5。在43摄氏度加热期间添加CHM(10微克/毫升)或PUR(100微克/毫升)抑制蛋白质合成并没有大大降低这种额外的耐热性。然而,如果在初始热处理和43摄氏度加热之间抑制蛋白质合成,那么在43摄氏度期间蛋白质合成对于产生对45摄氏度的额外耐热性是必需的。(摘要截断于400字)