Suppr超能文献

“粉边眼镜”:在……中寻找和肯定。

"Pink-tinted glasses": looking and affirmation in .

机构信息

English and Communications, Blackburn College, Carlinville, Illinois, USA.

English, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

J Lesbian Stud. 2022;26(4):323-337. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2022.2109256. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

Abstract

This article examines how the 2019 period drama generates its affirmative project of lesbian televisual representation. turns negative realities of gender and sexuality nonconformity in the nineteenth century to productive, affirmative use through what we view as a highly effective strategy of visually engaging viewers as witnesses to and coconspirators in Lister's journey through Lister's fourth wall breaks and the camera's prioritization of her perspective. We analyze 's various overlooked characters and reinscribed power hierarchies, which we argue results from both prioritizing Lister's perspective and fans' tendencies to view Lister through "pink-tinted glasses" as a result of cathexis with Lister. Through close reading of scenes illustrating social censorship, Lister's nonconforming gender performance, the labor behind Lister's wealth, and marriage's promise of happiness, we assert that the series misses subtle opportunities to critique the hierarchies on which Lister's exceptionalism relies. Pulling from Janet Lea's reception analysis, this article further asserts that fans interpret politically as well as for entertainment, and the elements to which they most strongly cathect reflect what fans most desire from LGBTQ + representational politics. Ultimately, we argue that if these continue to be the priorities of LGBTQ + fans and activist organizations today, the characters overlooked in Lister's pursuit of her own happiness offer audiences the opportunity to reflect on who may be sidelined or undercut in contemporary pursuits of LGBTQ + affirmation.

摘要

本文考察了 2019 年的古装剧如何产生其对女同性恋电视表现的肯定性项目。通过我们认为是一种非常有效的视觉策略,将 19 世纪性别和性取向不一致的负面现实转化为生产性的、肯定性的用途,即让观众作为李斯特穿越第四堵墙的见证人和同谋者参与进来,以及相机对她视角的优先化。我们分析了 的各种被忽视的角色和重新制定的权力等级制度,我们认为这是由于优先考虑李斯特的视角以及粉丝们由于对李斯特的“粉红色眼镜”的投注而倾向于通过李斯特来观看李斯特的结果。通过对说明社会审查、李斯特的非传统性别表现、李斯特财富背后的劳动以及婚姻幸福承诺的场景进行细读,我们断言该剧错过了微妙的批判李斯特特殊主义所依赖的等级制度的机会。本文借鉴了珍妮特·利 (Janet Lea) 的接受分析,进一步断言粉丝们不仅从政治上而且从娱乐上解读 ,他们最强烈投注的元素反映了粉丝们最希望从 LGBTQ+代表性政治中得到什么。最终,我们认为,如果这些仍然是 LGBTQ+粉丝和激进组织今天的优先事项,那么在李斯特追求自己幸福的过程中被忽视的角色为观众提供了一个机会,让他们反思在当代追求 LGBTQ+肯定的过程中,谁可能会被边缘化或削弱。

相似文献

1
"Pink-tinted glasses": looking and affirmation in .“粉边眼镜”:在……中寻找和肯定。
J Lesbian Stud. 2022;26(4):323-337. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2022.2109256. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
2
and the (re)discovery of Anne Lister.以及安妮·李斯特的(再)发现。
J Lesbian Stud. 2022;26(4):303-308. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2022.2125186. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
3
Adapting the queer language of Anne Lister's diaries.适应安妮·李斯特日记中的酷儿语言。
J Lesbian Stud. 2022;26(4):382-399. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2022.2109647. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
6
From text to screen: then and now.从文本到屏幕:过去与现在。
J Lesbian Stud. 2022;26(4):309-322. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2022.2085235. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
8
Queer Pilgrimage: Anne Lister, , and Locating Community.酷儿朝圣:安妮·李斯特、 和 寻找社群。
J Lesbian Stud. 2022;26(4):449-457. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2022.2130534. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
10
Can we call Anne Lister a lesbian?我们可以称安妮·李斯特为女同性恋者吗?
J Lesbian Stud. 2022;26(4):354-366. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2022.2101985. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验