Suppr超能文献

理解情境中的健康行为:五项关键健康行为的生态瞬时评估研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Understanding health behaviours in context: A systematic review and meta-analysis of ecological momentary assessment studies of five key health behaviours.

机构信息

Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Health Psychol Rev. 2022 Dec;16(4):576-601. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2112258. Epub 2022 Sep 15.

Abstract

Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) involves repeated, real-time sampling of health behaviours in context. We present the state-of-knowledge in EMA research focused on five key health behaviours (physical activity and sedentary behaviour, dietary behaviour, alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, sexual health), summarising theoretical (e.g., psychological and contextual predictors) and methodological aspects (e.g., study characteristics, EMA adherence). We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science until February 2021. We included studies focused on any of the aforementioned health behaviours in adult, non-clinical populations that assessed ≥1 psychological/contextual predictor and reported a predictor-behaviour association. A narrative synthesis and random-effects meta-analyses of EMA adherence were conducted. We included 633 studies. The median study duration was 14 days. The most frequently assessed predictors were 'negative feeling states' (21%) and 'motivation and goals' (16.5%). The pooled percentage of EMA adherence was high at 81.4% (95% CI = 80.0%, 82.8%, = 348) and did not differ by target behaviour but was somewhat higher in student (vs. general population) samples, when EMAs were delivered via mobile phones/smartphones (vs. handheld devices), and when event contingent (vs. fixed) sampling was used. This review showcases how the EMA method has been applied to improve understanding and prediction of health behaviours in context.

摘要

生态瞬时评估(EMA)涉及在特定背景下反复实时采样健康行为。我们呈现了 EMA 研究在五个关键健康行为(身体活动和久坐行为、饮食行为、饮酒、吸烟、性健康)方面的知识现状,总结了理论(例如,心理和环境预测因素)和方法学方面(例如,研究特征、EMA 依从性)。我们在 Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science 中进行了搜索,截至 2021 年 2 月。我们纳入了关注上述任何一种健康行为的成人非临床人群的研究,这些研究评估了≥1 个心理/环境预测因素,并报告了预测因素与行为的关联。我们对 EMA 依从性进行了叙述性综合和随机效应荟萃分析。我们纳入了 633 项研究。研究的中位持续时间为 14 天。最常评估的预测因素是“负面情绪状态”(21%)和“动机和目标”(16.5%)。EMA 依从性的汇总百分比很高,为 81.4%(95%CI=80.0%,82.8%,=348),但与目标行为无关,而在学生(与一般人群相比)样本中,当通过手机/智能手机(与手持设备相比)传递 EMA 时,以及当使用事件相关(与固定相比)采样时,EMA 依从性会略高一些。这项综述展示了 EMA 方法如何应用于提高对特定背景下健康行为的理解和预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55f0/9704370/40ebc39cf2ed/RHPR_A_2112258_F0001_OB.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验