• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于订阅的医疗补助支付模式及其对获取丙型肝炎药物的影响。

Medicaid Subscription-Based Payment Models and Implications for Access to Hepatitis C Medications.

机构信息

Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Aug 27;2(8):e212291. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2291. eCollection 2021 Aug.

DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2291
PMID:35977192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8796990/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be cured with direct-acting antiviral medications, but state Medicaid programs often restrict access to these lifesaving medications owing to their high costs. Subscription-based payment models (SBPMs), wherein states contract with a single manufacturer to supply prescriptions at a reduced price, may offer a solution that increases access. Whether SBPMs are associated with changes in HCV medication use is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate changes in Medicaid-covered HCV prescription fills after Louisiana and Washington implemented SBPMs on July 1, 2019.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional study examined trends in prescription fills of Medicaid-covered direct-acting antiviral HCV medications in Louisiana and Washington after implementation of SBPMs. A synthetic control approach was used to compare changes in HCV prescription fills between states that did and did not implement SBPMs. The unit of analysis was state-quarter. Outpatient direct-acting antiviral HCV prescription fills from the Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data files were obtained from all 50 US states and the District of Columbia from January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2020.

EXPOSURES

Implementation of SBPMs for Medicaid-covered direct-acting antiviral HCV medications.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Direct-acting antiviral HCV prescriptions filled per 100 000 Medicaid enrollees.

RESULTS

In the year preceding SBPM implementation, the mean (SD) rate of quarterly HCV prescription fills per 100 000 Medicaid enrollees was 43.1 (8.6) prescriptions in Louisiana and 50.1 (4.1) in Washington. After SBPM implementation, the mean (SD) rate of quarterly HCV prescription fills per 100 000 enrollees was 206.0 (51.2) prescriptions in Louisiana and 53.9 (11.0) in Washington. In synthetic control models, SBPM implementation in Louisiana was associated with an increase of 173.5 (95% CI, 74.3-265.3) quarterly prescription fills per 100 000 Medicaid enrollees during the following year, a relative increase of 534.5% (95% CI, 228.7%-1125.0%). Washington did not experience a significant change in prescription fills following SBPM implementation.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study, Louisiana experienced substantial increases in HCV medication use among its Medicaid-enrolled population following SBPM implementation, whereas Washington did not. These differences may partially be explained by state-level variation in SBPM implementation, historical restrictions on access to HCV medications, and responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.

摘要

重要性

丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)可以用直接作用的抗病毒药物治愈,但由于其成本高,州医疗补助计划经常限制这些救命药物的获取。基于订阅的支付模式(SBPM),即各州与单一制造商签订合同,以降低价格供应处方,可能提供一种增加获取途径的解决方案。SBPM 是否与 HCV 药物使用的变化有关尚不清楚。

目的

评估路易斯安那州和华盛顿州于 2019 年 7 月 1 日实施 SBPM 后,医疗补助覆盖的 HCV 处方填写情况的变化。

设计、地点和参与者:本横断面研究分析了路易斯安那州和华盛顿州实施 SBPM 后,医疗补助覆盖的直接作用抗病毒 HCV 药物的处方填写趋势。采用合成对照法比较了实施和未实施 SBPM 的州之间 HCV 处方填写的变化。分析单位为州季度。从 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 6 月 30 日,从美国所有 50 个州和哥伦比亚特区的医疗补助州药物使用数据文件中获取直接作用抗病毒 HCV 药物的医疗补助覆盖的处方填写情况。

暴露

实施 SBPM 以覆盖 Medicaid 覆盖的直接作用抗病毒 HCV 药物。

主要结果和措施

每 10 万 Medicaid 参保人填写的直接作用抗病毒 HCV 处方数。

结果

在实施 SBPM 之前的一年中,每 10 万 Medicaid 参保人每季度 HCV 处方填写的平均(SD)率为路易斯安那州 43.1(8.6)份,华盛顿州 50.1(4.1)份。实施 SBPM 后,每 10 万参保人每季度 HCV 处方填写的平均(SD)率为路易斯安那州 206.0(51.2)份,华盛顿州 53.9(11.0)份。在合成对照模型中,路易斯安那州实施 SBPM 后,在接下来的一年中,每 10 万 Medicaid 参保人每季度的处方填写量增加了 173.5(95%CI,74.3-265.3),相对增加了 534.5%(95%CI,228.7%-1125.0%)。华盛顿州在实施 SBPM 后,处方填写量没有明显变化。

结论和相关性

在这项横断面研究中,路易斯安那州在实施 SBPM 后,其 Medicaid 参保人群的 HCV 药物使用量大幅增加,而华盛顿州则没有。这些差异可能部分归因于 SBPM 实施的州级差异、对 HCV 药物获取的历史限制以及对 COVID-19 大流行的反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f25/8796990/d77d9811421e/jamahealthforum-e212291-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f25/8796990/08be1d60e5b4/jamahealthforum-e212291-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f25/8796990/d77d9811421e/jamahealthforum-e212291-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f25/8796990/08be1d60e5b4/jamahealthforum-e212291-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f25/8796990/d77d9811421e/jamahealthforum-e212291-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Medicaid Subscription-Based Payment Models and Implications for Access to Hepatitis C Medications.基于订阅的医疗补助支付模式及其对获取丙型肝炎药物的影响。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Aug 27;2(8):e212291. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2291. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Association of Medicaid Managed Care Drug Carve Outs With Hepatitis C Virus Prescription Use.医疗补助管理式医疗药品除外计划与丙型肝炎病毒处方使用的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Aug 27;2(8):e212285. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2285. eCollection 2021 Aug.
3
Improving Access to High-Value, High-Cost Medicines: The Use of Subscription Models to Treat Hepatitis C Using Direct-Acting Antivirals in the United States.提高高价值、高成本药品的可及性:在美国使用订阅模式治疗丙型肝炎的直接作用抗病毒药物。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2022 Dec 1;47(6):691-708. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10041121.
4
Changes in Use of Hepatitis C Direct-Acting Antivirals After Access Restrictions Were Eased by State Medicaid Programs.国家医疗补助计划放宽对丙型肝炎直接作用抗病毒药物的使用限制后,其使用情况发生变化。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Apr 5;5(4):e240302. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0302.
5
Medicaid Expansion and Restriction Policies for Hepatitis C Treatment.医疗补助扩大和丙型肝炎治疗限制政策。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2422406. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.22406.
6
Effect of relaxing hepatitis C treatment restrictions on direct-acting antiviral use in a Medicaid program: an interrupted time series analysis.放宽医疗补助计划中丙型肝炎治疗限制对直接作用抗病毒药物使用的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jul;27(7):856-864. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.7.856.
7
Hepatitis C Treatment Initiation Among US Medicaid Enrollees.美国医疗补助计划参保者中的丙型肝炎治疗启动。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2327326. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.27326.
8
Assessing the burden of illness of chronic hepatitis C and impact of direct-acting antiviral use on healthcare costs in Medicaid.评估慢性丙型肝炎的疾病负担以及直接作用抗病毒药物在医疗补助计划中对医疗成本的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jun;25(8 Suppl):S131-S139.
9
Prescription Drug Utilization and Reimbursement Increased Following State Medicaid Expansion in 2014.2014 年,州医疗补助计划扩大后,处方药的利用和报销都有所增加。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Mar;23(3):355-363. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.3.355.
10
Louisiana Medicaid access for treatment and care for hepatitis C virus (LA-MATCH) project: A cross-sectional study protocol.路易斯安那州医疗补助治疗和护理丙型肝炎病毒(LA-MATCH)项目:一项横断面研究方案。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 6;16(10):e0257437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257437. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of Pharmacists and Collaborative Practice Agreements to Treat Hepatitis C: A Survey of Primary Care Clinicians in Washington State.使用药剂师及协作医疗协议治疗丙型肝炎:华盛顿州初级保健临床医生调查
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251359547. doi: 10.1177/21501319251359547. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
2
Magnetic resonance evaluation of three-dimensional liver fat fraction by hepatitis C status and associations with inflammatory cytokines.丙型肝炎状态对肝脏三维脂肪分数的磁共振评估及其与炎性细胞因子的关联
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 23;20(7):e0327668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327668. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of COVID-19 shelter-in-place orders varied by state.新冠疫情避难所令的有效性因州而异。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0245008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245008. eCollection 2020.
2
Association of Changes in Missouri Firearm Laws With Adolescent and Young Adult Suicides by Firearms.密苏里州枪支法律变化与青少年和青年枪支自杀的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024303. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24303.
3
Estimating the Year Each State in the United States Will Achieve the World Health Organization's Elimination Targets for Hepatitis C.
Hepatitis C Care in the Greater New Orleans Area: Patient Perspectives on the Barriers and Facilitators to Care.
大新奥尔良地区的丙型肝炎护理:患者对护理障碍和促进因素的看法。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2025;36(1):257-283. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2025.a951596.
4
Improving antibiotic prescribing - Recommendations for funding and pricing policies to enhance use of point-of-care tests.改善抗生素处方开具——关于资助和定价政策以促进即时检验使用的建议
Health Policy Open. 2024 Sep 28;7:100129. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2024.100129. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
5
Changes in Use of Hepatitis C Direct-Acting Antivirals After Access Restrictions Were Eased by State Medicaid Programs.国家医疗补助计划放宽对丙型肝炎直接作用抗病毒药物的使用限制后,其使用情况发生变化。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Apr 5;5(4):e240302. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0302.
6
Advancing Hepatitis C Elimination through Opt-Out Universal Screening and Treatment in Carceral Settings, United States.通过在监禁场所实施默认普遍筛查和治疗来推进丙型肝炎消除工作,美国。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2024 Apr;30(13):S80-S87. doi: 10.3201/eid3013.230859.
7
Pilot study of a community pharmacist led program to treat hepatitis C virus among people who inject drugs.由社区药剂师主导的针对注射吸毒者治疗丙型肝炎病毒项目的试点研究。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2023 Dec 23;10:100213. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2023.100213. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
Rapid Treatment Initiation for Hepatitis C Virus Infection: Potential Benefits, Current Limitations, and Real-World Examples.丙型肝炎病毒感染的快速治疗启动:潜在益处、当前局限性及实际案例
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2022 Nov;18(11):628-638.
9
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a Pharmacist, Physician, and Patient Navigator-Collaborative Care Model (PPP-CCM) to treat hepatitis C among people who inject drugs.实施药师、医生和患者导航员合作护理模式(PPP-CCM)以治疗注射吸毒者丙型肝炎的障碍和促进因素。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Jan;111:103924. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103924. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
10
Value Insider Season 1 Episode 3: How Does Budget Impact and Affordability in Healthcare Work? (BI and Affordability) [Podcast].《价值洞察》第一季第三集:预算如何影响医疗保健的可及性与可负担性?(商业智能与可负担性)[播客]
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Oct 26;15:7879-7884. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S390689. eCollection 2022.
估算美国各州实现世界卫生组织丙型肝炎消除目标的年份。
Adv Ther. 2021 Jan;38(1):423-440. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01535-3. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
4
Hepatitis C Virus Incidence in a Cohort in Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder in New York City.在纽约市接受阿片类药物使用障碍药物辅助治疗的队列中丙型肝炎病毒的发病率。
J Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 2;222(Suppl 5):S322-S334. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz659.
5
Association of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C With After-Treatment Costs Among Medicare Beneficiaries.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎与医疗保险受益人的治疗后费用的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208081. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8081.
6
Association of Recreational Cannabis Laws in Colorado and Washington State With Changes in Traffic Fatalities, 2005-2017.科罗拉多州和华盛顿州休闲大麻法律与 2005-2017 年交通死亡人数变化的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Aug 1;180(8):1061-1068. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1757.
7
Differences Between Managed Care and Fee-for-Service Medicaid in the Use of Generics for High-Rebate Drugs: The Cases of Insulin Glargine and Glatiramer.管理式医疗与按服务收费的医疗补助制度在高回扣药物使用仿制药方面的差异:以甘精胰岛素和格拉替雷为例。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Feb;26(2):154-159. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.2.154.
8
Hepatitis C drug prescriptions and Medicaid policies--four states, Indian health care system, USA 2018.2018 年美国四个州、印第安人医疗保健系统的丙型肝炎药物处方和医疗补助政策。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Dec 4;18(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1101-4.
9
Assessing the burden of illness of chronic hepatitis C and impact of direct-acting antiviral use on healthcare costs in Medicaid.评估慢性丙型肝炎的疾病负担以及直接作用抗病毒药物在医疗补助计划中对医疗成本的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jun;25(8 Suppl):S131-S139.
10
Rationing Care: Barriers to Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment in Medicaid Treatment Criteria.医疗资源配给:医疗补助计划治疗标准中直接抗病毒治疗的障碍
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2018 Dec 14;12(5):122-124. doi: 10.1002/cld.751. eCollection 2018 Nov.