• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎与医疗保险受益人的治疗后费用的关联。

Association of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C With After-Treatment Costs Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University College of Health and Human Development, University Park.

Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208081. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8081.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8081
PMID:32602909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7327546/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C is highly effective but expensive. Evidence is scarce on whether DAA therapy reduces downstream medical costs.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association of DAA therapy with posttreatment medical costs among Medicare beneficiaries.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study obtained data from various Medicare claims files for 2013 to 2017. The study population comprised patients with a hepatitis C diagnosis in 2014 who were enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare and Part D. Multivariate regression models were used to compare changes in medical costs over a 30-month posttreatment follow-up period between patients who used DAA therapy (treatment group) and a propensity score-matched cohort of patients who did not use DAA (control group). The model was estimated separately for patients with and those without cirrhosis. Data were analyzed between September 1, 2019, and March 31, 2020.

EXPOSURES

Completion of DAA therapy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Two outcomes were established: hepatitis C or liver disease-related costs and total medical costs. Costs were measured by Medicare-allowed payments, which included Medicare reimbursements, patient responsibilities, and third-party payments.

RESULTS

A propensity score-matched cohort of 15 198 patients (9038 men [59.5%]; mean [SD] age, 60.2 [10.8] years) was analyzed. During the first 6 months after DAA therapy, hepatitis C or liver disease-related costs decreased by $2498 (95% CI, -$3356 to -$1640) in patients with cirrhosis and by $486 (95% CI, -$603 to -$369) in patients without cirrhosis compared with control or untreated patients. Cumulative reductions in hepatitis C or liver disease-related costs during 30 months after DAA treatment were $15 808 (95% CI, -$22 530 to -$9085) in patients with cirrhosis and $5372 (95% CI, -$6384 to -$4360) in patients without cirrhosis. Among those who used DAA therapy compared with control patients, total medical costs decreased by $2905 (95% CI, -$4832 to -$979) in patients with cirrhosis and by $1287 (95% CI, -$2393 to -$283) in patients without cirrhosis during the first 6 months after DAA therapy. No statistically significant association was found between DAA therapy and total medical cost reductions after 12 months of follow-up. Cumulative reductions in total costs during 30 months after DAA therapy were $7074 (95% CI, -$18 448 to $4298) in patients with cirrhosis and $7497 (95% CI, -$14 287 to -$709) in patients without cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study reported that DAA therapy appeared to be associated with a decrease in hepatitis C or liver disease-related costs for 30 months after treatment and with reduction in total medical costs for only 12 months after treatment in patients with or without cirrhosis. Longer-term follow-up studies with diverse outcomes are necessary to assess the value of DAA therapy.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0543/7327546/f8bc683986a4/jamanetwopen-3-e208081-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0543/7327546/cafc3c77976e/jamanetwopen-3-e208081-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0543/7327546/fd3f2228e26f/jamanetwopen-3-e208081-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0543/7327546/f8bc683986a4/jamanetwopen-3-e208081-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0543/7327546/cafc3c77976e/jamanetwopen-3-e208081-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0543/7327546/fd3f2228e26f/jamanetwopen-3-e208081-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0543/7327546/f8bc683986a4/jamanetwopen-3-e208081-g003.jpg
摘要

重要性

直接作用抗病毒(DAA)疗法治疗丙型肝炎非常有效,但费用昂贵。关于 DAA 疗法是否降低下游医疗费用的证据很少。

目的

研究 DAA 疗法与医疗保险受益人的治疗后医疗费用之间的关联。

设计、地点和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究从 2013 年至 2017 年的各种医疗保险索赔文件中获取数据。研究人群包括 2014 年诊断患有丙型肝炎的患者,他们参加了按服务收费的医疗保险和 Part D。使用多变量回归模型比较使用 DAA 治疗(治疗组)和未使用 DAA 治疗的倾向评分匹配队列(对照组)的患者在 30 个月的治疗后随访期间的医疗费用变化。该模型分别针对有和没有肝硬化的患者进行了估计。数据在 2019 年 9 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 31 日之间进行了分析。

暴露

完成 DAA 治疗。

主要结果和措施

建立了两个结果:丙型肝炎或肝病相关费用和总医疗费用。费用通过医疗保险允许的付款来衡量,包括医疗保险报销、患者责任和第三方付款。

结果

对 15198 名患者(9038 名男性[59.5%];平均[SD]年龄,60.2[10.8]岁)进行了倾向评分匹配队列分析。在 DAA 治疗后的头 6 个月内,肝硬化患者的丙型肝炎或肝病相关费用减少了 2498 美元(95%CI,-3356 至-1640),非肝硬化患者减少了 486 美元(95%CI,-603 至-369),与对照组或未治疗患者相比。在 DAA 治疗后 30 个月内,肝硬化患者的丙型肝炎或肝病相关费用累计减少 15808 美元(95%CI,-22530 至-9085),非肝硬化患者减少 5372 美元(95%CI,-6384 至-4360)。与对照组患者相比,在使用 DAA 治疗的患者中,在 DAA 治疗后的头 6 个月内,肝硬化患者的总医疗费用减少了 2905 美元(95%CI,-4832 至-979),非肝硬化患者减少了 1287 美元(95%CI,-2393 至-283)。在 12 个月的随访后,未发现 DAA 治疗与总医疗费用降低之间存在统计学关联。在 DAA 治疗后 30 个月内,肝硬化患者的总费用累计减少 7074 美元(95%CI,-18448 至 4298),非肝硬化患者减少 7497 美元(95%CI,-14287 至-709)。

结论和相关性

本研究报告称,DAA 疗法似乎与治疗后 30 个月内丙型肝炎或肝病相关费用的降低以及治疗后 12 个月内总医疗费用的降低相关,但在有或没有肝硬化的患者中仅为 12 个月。需要进行具有不同结果的长期随访研究,以评估 DAA 疗法的价值。

相似文献

1
Association of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C With After-Treatment Costs Among Medicare Beneficiaries.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎与医疗保险受益人的治疗后费用的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208081. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8081.
2
Association of Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment With Mortality Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Hepatitis C.直接作用抗病毒治疗与医疗保险受益人群丙型肝炎死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011055. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11055.
3
Health care utilization and costs associated with direct-acting antivirals for patients with substance use disorders and chronic hepatitis C.与物质使用障碍和慢性丙型肝炎患者直接作用抗病毒药物相关的医疗保健利用和费用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Oct;27(10):1388-1402. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.10.1388.
4
Impact of All-Oral Direct-Acting Antivirals on Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C in the United States.美国慢性丙型肝炎患者全口服直接抗病毒药物对临床和经济结局的影响。
Hepatology. 2019 Mar;69(3):1032-1045. doi: 10.1002/hep.30303. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
5
Association of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy With Liver and Nonliver Complications and Long-term Mortality in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C.直接作用抗病毒治疗与慢性丙型肝炎患者的肝脏和非肝脏并发症及长期死亡率的关系。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Feb 1;183(2):97-105. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.5699.
6
Treatment of hepatitis C with direct-acting antivirals significantly reduces liver-related hospitalizations in patients with cirrhosis.使用直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎可显著降低肝硬化患者与肝脏相关的住院率。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;30(11):1378-1383. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001195.
7
Discontinuation of new hepatitis C drugs among Medicare patients.医疗保险患者中新型丙型肝炎药物的停药。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Feb;26(2):84-88. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42397.
8
Association of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes Project With Use of Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment Among US Adults With Hepatitis C.社区医疗保健结果项目扩展与美国丙型肝炎成人直接抗病毒治疗使用率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2115523. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15523.
9
Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Use of Direct-Acting Antivirals Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Chronic Hepatitis C, 2014-2016.2014-2016 年,医疗保险受益人群中慢性丙型肝炎直接作用抗病毒药物的使用存在种族/民族和社会经济差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Nov;25(11):1236-1242. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.11.1236.
10
Direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus infection and risk of incident liver cancer: a retrospective cohort study.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎病毒感染与肝癌发病风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 May;47(9):1278-1287. doi: 10.1111/apt.14593. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Medicaid Managed Care Drug Carve Outs With Hepatitis C Virus Prescription Use.医疗补助管理式医疗药品除外计划与丙型肝炎病毒处方使用的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Aug 27;2(8):e212285. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2285. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Medicaid Subscription-Based Payment Models and Implications for Access to Hepatitis C Medications.基于订阅的医疗补助支付模式及其对获取丙型肝炎药物的影响。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Aug 27;2(8):e212291. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2291. eCollection 2021 Aug.
3
Economic impact of applying the AASLD-IDSA simplified treatment algorithm on the real-world management of hepatitis C.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of Direct-Acting Antivirals for Chronic Hepatitis C in a Large Cohort of Older Adults in the United States.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗美国老年人群慢性丙型肝炎的疗效:一项大型队列研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Feb;68(2):379-387. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16206. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
2
Real-world effectiveness and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in 723 patients with chronic hepatitis C.723 例慢性丙型肝炎患者使用 glecaprevir/pibrentasvir 的真实世界疗效和安全性。
J Hepatol. 2019 Mar;70(3):379-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
3
Impact of All-Oral Direct-Acting Antivirals on Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C in the United States.
应用 AASLD-IDSA 简化治疗算法对丙型肝炎的实际管理的经济影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Jan;28(1):48-57. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.21246. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
4
Health care utilization and costs associated with direct-acting antivirals for patients with substance use disorders and chronic hepatitis C.与物质使用障碍和慢性丙型肝炎患者直接作用抗病毒药物相关的医疗保健利用和费用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Oct;27(10):1388-1402. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.10.1388.
美国慢性丙型肝炎患者全口服直接抗病毒药物对临床和经济结局的影响。
Hepatology. 2019 Mar;69(3):1032-1045. doi: 10.1002/hep.30303. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
4
Sustained Virologic Response and Costs Associated with Direct-Acting Antivirals for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in Oklahoma Medicaid.俄克拉荷马州医疗补助计划中直接作用抗病毒药物治疗慢性丙型肝炎感染的持续病毒学应答率和成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jul;24(7):664-676. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.7.664.
5
Real-world effectiveness of elbasvir/grazoprevir In HCV-infected patients in the US veterans affairs healthcare system.艾尔巴韦/格拉瑞韦在美国退伍军人事务医疗系统中丙型肝炎病毒感染患者中的真实世界疗效。
J Viral Hepat. 2018 Nov;25(11):1270-1279. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12937. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
6
Value-Based Pricing and Patient Access for Specialty Drugs.专科药物的价值定价与患者可及性
JAMA. 2018 Jun 5;319(21):2169-2170. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5367.
7
Direct-acting antiviral sustained virologic response: Impact on mortality in patients without advanced liver disease.直接作用抗病毒药物持续病毒学应答:对无晚期肝病患者死亡率的影响。
Hepatology. 2018 Sep;68(3):827-838. doi: 10.1002/hep.29811. Epub 2018 May 14.
8
Modeling Health Care Expenditures and Use.建模医疗保健支出和使用。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:489-505. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013517. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
9
Economic Burden of Hepatitis C Infection.丙型肝炎感染的经济负担。
Clin Liver Dis. 2017 Aug;21(3):579-594. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
10
Assessment of cost of innovation versus the value of health gains associated with treatment of chronic hepatitis C in the United States: The quality-adjusted cost of care.美国慢性丙型肝炎治疗创新成本与健康收益价值评估:质量调整后的护理成本
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(41):e5048. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005048.