• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疾病监测、预测和风险调整新框架的开发与评估:诊断项目分类系统。

Development and Assessment of a New Framework for Disease Surveillance, Prediction, and Risk Adjustment: The Diagnostic Items Classification System.

机构信息

Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Mar 25;3(3):e220276. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0276. eCollection 2022 Mar.

DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0276
PMID:35977291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8956982/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Current disease risk-adjustment formulas in the US rely on diagnostic classification frameworks that predate the .

OBJECTIVE

To develop an -based classification framework for predicting diverse health care payment, quality, and performance outcomes.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Physician teams mapped all diagnoses into 3 types of diagnostic items (DXIs): main effect DXIs that specify diseases; modifiers, such as laterality, timing, and acuity; and scaled variables, such as body mass index, gestational age, and birth weight. Every diagnosis was mapped to at least 1 DXI. Stepwise and weighted least-squares estimation predicted cost and utilization outcomes, and their performance was compared with models built on (1) the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Classifications Software Refined (CCSR) categories, and (2) the Health and Human Services Hierarchical Condition Categories (HHS-HCC) used in the Affordable Care Act Marketplace. Each model's performance was validated using , mean absolute error, the Cumming prediction measure, and comparisons of actual to predicted outcomes by spending percentiles and by diagnostic frequency. The IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, 2016 to 2018, was used, which included privately insured, full- or partial-year eligible enrollees aged 0 to 64 years in plans with medical, drug, and mental health/substance use coverage.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Fourteen concurrent outcomes were predicted: overall and plan-paid health care spending (top-coded and not top-coded); enrollee out-of-pocket spending; hospital days and admissions; emergency department visits; and spending for 6 types of services. The primary outcome was annual health care spending top-coded at $250 000.

RESULTS

A total of 65 901 460 person-years were split into 90% estimation/10% validation samples (n = 6 604 259). In all, 3223 DXIs were created: 2435 main effects, 772 modifiers, and 16 scaled items. Stepwise regressions predicting annual health care spending (mean [SD], $5821 [$17 653]) selected 76% of the main effect DXIs with no evidence of overfitting. Validated was 0.589 in the DXI model, 0.539 for CCSR, and 0.428 for HHS-HCC. Use of DXIs reduced underpayment for enrollees with rare (1-in-a-million) diagnoses by 83% relative to HHS-HCCs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this diagnostic modeling study, the new DXI classification system showed improved predictions over existing diagnostic classification systems for all spending and utilization outcomes considered.

摘要

重要性

目前美国的疾病风险调整公式依赖于诊断分类框架,这些框架早于 .

目的

开发一种基于的分类框架,用于预测多样化的医疗保健支付、质量和绩效结果。

设计、设置和参与者:医师团队将所有的诊断映射到 3 种诊断项目类型(DXI):指定疾病的主要效应 DXI;修饰符,如侧位、时间和 acuity;以及缩放变量,如体重指数、孕龄和出生体重。每个诊断都至少映射到 1 个 DXI。逐步和加权最小二乘法估计预测了成本和利用结果,并将其性能与基于以下模型进行了比较:(1)医疗保健研究和质量临床分类软件改进版(CCSR)类别,和(2)平价医疗法案市场中使用的卫生与公共服务分层条件类别(HHS-HCC)。使用验证了每个模型的性能,使用均方误差、Cumming 预测度量、按支出百分位和按诊断频率比较实际和预测结果来评估。使用了 IBM MarketScan 商业索赔和遭遇数据库,2016 年至 2018 年,其中包括私人保险、符合条件的全或部分年度合格参与者,年龄在 0 至 64 岁之间,计划中包括医疗、药物和精神健康/物质使用覆盖范围。

主要结果和测量

预测了 14 个并发结果:整体和计划支付的医疗保健支出(最高编码和非最高编码);参保人自付支出;住院天数和入院;急诊就诊;以及 6 种服务的支出。主要结果是每年最高编码为 250000 美元的医疗保健支出。

结果

共分割出 65901460 人年的 90%估计/10%验证样本(n=6604259)。共创建了 3223 个 DXI:2435 个主要效应,772 个修饰符,16 个缩放项。逐步回归预测年度医疗保健支出(平均值[标准差],$5821 [$17653])选择了 76%的主要效应 DXI,没有过度拟合的证据。在 DXI 模型中验证的为 0.589,CCSR 为 0.539,HHS-HCC 为 0.428。与 HHS-HCC 相比,使用 DXI 将罕见(百万分之一)诊断的参保人欠付减少了 83%。

结论

在这项诊断建模研究中,新的 DXI 分类系统在考虑的所有支出和使用结果方面,显示出优于现有诊断分类系统的改进预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a546/8956982/02921e640c44/jamahealthforum-e220276-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a546/8956982/e60901e9bc2a/jamahealthforum-e220276-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a546/8956982/02921e640c44/jamahealthforum-e220276-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a546/8956982/e60901e9bc2a/jamahealthforum-e220276-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a546/8956982/02921e640c44/jamahealthforum-e220276-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Assessment of a New Framework for Disease Surveillance, Prediction, and Risk Adjustment: The Diagnostic Items Classification System.疾病监测、预测和风险调整新框架的开发与评估:诊断项目分类系统。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Mar 25;3(3):e220276. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0276. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
A Novel Machine Learning Algorithm for Creating Risk-Adjusted Payment Formulas.一种用于创建风险调整支付公式的新型机器学习算法。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Apr 5;5(4):e240625. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0625.
3
Diagnostic Category Prevalence in 3 Classification Systems Across the Transition to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification.在向国际疾病分类第十版临床修订版过渡的过程中,3 种分类系统中的诊断类别患病率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202280. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2280.
4
Plan Selection, Enrollee Risk, and Health Spending on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Individual Marketplaces, 2019.《2019 年患者保护与平价医疗法案个人市场的计划选择、参保人风险与医疗支出》
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e234529. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4529.
5
Association of Financial Integration Between Physicians and Hospitals With Commercial Health Care Prices.医生和医院之间财务融合与商业医疗价格的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1932-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4610.
6
Out-of-Pocket Spending for Non-Birth-Related Hospitalizations of Privately Insured US Children, 2017 to 2019.2017 年至 2019 年,私营保险的美国儿童非分娩相关住院的自付费用。
JAMA Pediatr. 2023 May 1;177(5):516-525. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.0130.
7
Health Care Spending, Utilization, and Quality 8 Years into Global Payment.全球支付实施 8 年后的医疗保健支出、利用和质量
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 18;381(3):252-263. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1813621.
8
Medical Costs of Substance Use Disorders in the US Employer-Sponsored Insurance Population.美国雇主赞助保险人群中物质使用障碍的医疗费用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2252378. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.52378.
9
Incorporating Prescription Drugs Into Affordable Care Act Risk Adjustment.将处方药纳入平价医疗法案的风险调整。
Med Care. 2020 Jun;58(6):504-510. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001302.
10
The effects of mental health parity on spending and utilization for bipolar, major depression, and adjustment disorders.心理健康均等化对双相情感障碍、重度抑郁症和适应障碍的支出和利用的影响。
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;170(2):180-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12030392.

引用本文的文献

1
A Real-world Evaluation of Longitudinal Healthcare Expenses in a Health System Registry of Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Disease Enabled by the 21st Century Cures Act.基于《21世纪治愈法案》的2型糖尿病和心血管疾病健康系统登记处纵向医疗费用的真实世界评估。
medRxiv. 2025 May 29:2025.05.28.25328527. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.28.25328527.
2
A framework for ex-ante evaluation of the potential effects of risk equalization and risk sharing in health insurance markets with regulated competition.一个用于对具有监管竞争的健康保险市场中风险均等化和风险分担的潜在影响进行事前评估的框架。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jul 24;14(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00540-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The classic "Carrot-and-stick approach": Addressing underutilization of ICD-10 increased data granularity.经典的“胡萝卜加大棒方法”:解决ICD - 10利用不足问题可提高数据粒度。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2020 Oct 4;4:100032. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2020.100032. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Improving the Performance of Risk Adjustment Systems: Constrained Regressions, Reinsurance, and Variable Selection.提升风险调整系统的性能:约束回归、再保险与变量选择
Am J Health Econ. 2021 Fall;7(4):497-521. doi: 10.1086/716199. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
3
Diagnostic Category Prevalence in 3 Classification Systems Across the Transition to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification.
A Novel Machine Learning Algorithm for Creating Risk-Adjusted Payment Formulas.
一种用于创建风险调整支付公式的新型机器学习算法。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Apr 5;5(4):e240625. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0625.
4
Comparison of diagnosis-based risk adjustment methods for episode-based costs to apply in efficiency measurement.基于诊断的病例组成本风险调整方法比较,以应用于效率测量。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 1;23(1):1334. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10282-4.
5
Patterns of Morbidity Across the Lifespan: A Population Segmentation Framework for Classifying Health Care Needs for All Ages.全生命周期发病模式:一个用于分类各年龄段医疗保健需求的人群细分框架。
Med Care. 2024 Nov 1;62(11):732-740. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001898. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
在向国际疾病分类第十版临床修订版过渡的过程中,3 种分类系统中的诊断类别患病率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202280. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2280.
4
A revised classification algorithm for assessing emergency department visit severity of populations.一种用于评估人群急诊科就诊严重程度的修订分类算法。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Mar;26(3):119-125. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42636.
5
The impact of the ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM transition on the prevalence of birth defects among infant hospitalizations in the United States.ICD-9-CM 向 ICD-10-CM 转换对美国住院婴儿先天缺陷发生率的影响。
Birth Defects Res. 2019 Nov 1;111(18):1365-1379. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1578. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
6
Matching and Imputation Methods for Risk Adjustment in the Health Insurance Marketplaces.医疗保险市场中风险调整的匹配与插补方法
Stat Biosci. 2017 Dec;9(2):525-542. doi: 10.1007/s12561-015-9135-7. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
7
Diagnosis-based Cost Groups in the Dutch Risk-equalization Model: Effects of Clustering Diagnoses and of Allowing Patients to be Classified into Multiple Risk-classes.荷兰风险均等化模型中基于诊断的成本组:诊断聚类以及允许患者被归入多个风险类别的影响
Med Care. 2018 Jan;56(1):91-96. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000828.
8
Identification of Emergency Department Visits in Medicare Administrative Claims: Approaches and Implications.医疗保险行政索赔中急诊科就诊情况的识别:方法与影响
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;24(4):422-431. doi: 10.1111/acem.13140. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
9
STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.STARD 2015:报告诊断准确性研究的必备项目更新清单。
BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5527.
10
Magnitude of Impact, Overall and on Subspecialties, of Transitioning in Radiology from ICD-9 to ICD-10 Codes.放射学中从国际疾病分类第九版(ICD - 9)编码转换至国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)编码的总体影响及对各亚专业的影响程度
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Nov;12(11):1155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.06.014. Epub 2015 Jul 26.