• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Disease Reactivation After Cessation of Disease-Modifying Therapy in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.疾病修饰治疗停药后复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的疾病再激活。
Neurology. 2022 Oct 25;99(17):e1926-e1944. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201029. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
2
Comparison Between Dimethyl Fumarate, Fingolimod, and Ocrelizumab After Natalizumab Cessation.那他珠单抗停药后富马酸二甲酯、芬戈莫德和奥瑞珠单抗的比较。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 Jul 1;80(7):739-748. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.1542.
3
Discontinuation of disease-modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis to plan a pregnancy: A retrospective registry study.为计划怀孕而停用多发性硬化症的疾病修正治疗:一项回顾性登记研究。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020 Nov;46:102518. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102518. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
4
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod in rapidly evolving severe relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom.在英国,对比那珠单抗和芬戈莫德治疗快速进展性重度复发缓解型多发性硬化的疗效和成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):109-125. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2293379. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
5
The comparative effectiveness of fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.芬戈莫德、那他珠单抗和奥瑞珠单抗在复发缓解型多发性硬化症中的比较疗效。
Neurol Sci. 2023 Jun;44(6):2121-2129. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06608-z. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant vs Fingolimod, Natalizumab, and Ocrelizumab in Highly Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.在高活性复发缓解型多发性硬化症中,自体造血干细胞移植与芬戈莫德、那他珠单抗和奥瑞珠单抗的疗效比较。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 Jul 1;80(7):702-713. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.1184.
7
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Natalizumab and Fingolimod in Patients with Inadequate Response to Disease-Modifying Therapies in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the United Kingdom.在英国,对于疾病修饰疗法应答不足的复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者,那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德的疗效和成本效益比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Mar;40(3):323-339. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01106-6. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
8
Effectiveness of cladribine compared to fingolimod, natalizumab, ocrelizumab and alemtuzumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.氯法拉滨与那他珠单抗、奥瑞珠单抗和阿仑单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的疗效比较。
Mult Scler. 2024 Aug;30(9):1163-1175. doi: 10.1177/13524585241267211. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
9
High-Efficacy Therapy Discontinuation vs Continuation in Patients 50 Years and Older With Nonactive MS.50 岁及以上非活动期多发性硬化症患者的高效疗法停药与继续治疗。
JAMA Neurol. 2024 May 1;81(5):490-498. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0395.
10
Comparing switch to ocrelizumab, cladribine or natalizumab after fingolimod treatment cessation in multiple sclerosis.比较多发性硬化症患者停用芬戈莫德后改用奥瑞珠单抗、克拉屈滨或那他珠单抗的效果。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022 Dec;93(12):1330-1337. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2022-330104. Epub 2022 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Immune Reconstitution Therapy with Cladribine Tablets in the Management of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in Older Patients.克拉屈滨片免疫重建疗法在老年复发型多发性硬化症治疗中的作用
Neurol Ther. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s40120-025-00767-1.
2
Outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis and solid organ cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的多发性硬化症和实体器官癌症患者的预后。
Neurooncol Adv. 2025 Mar 4;7(1):vdaf048. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf048. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Treatment De-escalation in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: An Observational Study.复发缓解型多发性硬化症的治疗降阶梯:一项观察性研究。
CNS Drugs. 2025 Apr;39(4):403-416. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01164-w. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
4
De-Escalation of Disease-Modifying Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis-A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study.多发性硬化症中疾病修正疗法的降阶梯治疗——一项丹麦全国队列研究
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Feb;32(2):e70042. doi: 10.1111/ene.70042.
5
Rebound effect, discontinuation, and withdrawal syndromes associated with drugs used in psychiatric and neurological disorders.与精神和神经疾病用药相关的反跳效应、停药反应及戒断综合征。
Pharmacol Rep. 2025 Apr;77(2):303-314. doi: 10.1007/s43440-024-00689-z. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
6
De-escalating and discontinuing disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis.降低多发性硬化症病情修饰疗法的强度并停药
Brain. 2025 May 13;148(5):1459-1478. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae409.
7
Switching from natalizumab to antiCD20 monoclonal antibodies: Short transition interval is associated with improved outcome.从那他珠单抗转换为抗CD20单克隆抗体:较短的转换间隔与改善的预后相关。
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jan;32(1):e16587. doi: 10.1111/ene.16587.
8
Different Treatment Outcomes of Multiple Sclerosis Patients Receiving Ocrelizumab or Ofatumumab.接受奥瑞珠单抗或奥法妥木单抗治疗的多发性硬化症患者的不同治疗结果。
Ann Neurol. 2025 Mar;97(3):583-595. doi: 10.1002/ana.27143. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
9
Clinical and radiological implications of subpotent generic fingolimod in multiple sclerosis: a case series.低效通用型芬戈莫德在多发性硬化症中的临床和影像学意义:病例系列
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2024 Nov 21;17:17562864241300047. doi: 10.1177/17562864241300047. eCollection 2024.
10
Patient-centered pregnancy planning in multiple sclerosis: evidence for a new era.以患者为中心的多发性硬化症妊娠规划:新时代的证据。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2024 Oct;82(10):1-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791202. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Lymphocyte recovery after fingolimod discontinuation in patients with MS.多发性硬化症患者停用芬戈莫德后淋巴细胞的恢复情况。
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020 Aug 14;7(6). doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000874. Print 2020 Nov.
2
Contribution of Relapse-Independent Progression vs Relapse-Associated Worsening to Overall Confirmed Disability Accumulation in Typical Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in a Pooled Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.在两项随机临床试验的汇总分析中,复发无关进展与复发相关恶化对典型复发型多发性硬化症总体确认残疾累积的贡献。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Sep 1;77(9):1132-1140. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1568.
3
Clinical and therapeutic predictors of disease outcomes in AQP4-IgG+ neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.AQP4-IgG+ 视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病的临床和治疗预测因子。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020 Feb;38:101868. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101868. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
4
Fingolimod Rebound: A Review of the Clinical Experience and Management Considerations.芬戈莫德反弹:临床经验与管理考量综述
Neurol Ther. 2019 Dec;8(2):241-250. doi: 10.1007/s40120-019-00160-9. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
5
The MSBase registry: Informing clinical practice.MSBase 注册表:为临床实践提供信息。
Mult Scler. 2019 Dec;25(14):1828-1834. doi: 10.1177/1352458519848965. Epub 2019 May 23.
6
Post-natalizumab disease reactivation in multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.多发性硬化症中那他珠单抗停药后疾病再激活:系统评价与荟萃分析
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2019 Mar 29;12:1756286419837809. doi: 10.1177/1756286419837809. eCollection 2019.
7
Comparison of fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis.比较芬戈莫德、二甲基富马酸酯和特立氟胺治疗多发性硬化症。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;90(4):458-468. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319831. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
8
Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP): A unique multimodal nationwide MS registry in France.法国多发性硬化症观察站(OFSEP):法国独一无二的全国性多发性硬化症多模式注册中心。
Mult Scler. 2020 Jan;26(1):118-122. doi: 10.1177/1352458518815602. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
9
Predictors of relapse and disability progression in MS patients who discontinue disease-modifying therapy.停止疾病修正治疗的 MS 患者复发和残疾进展的预测因素。
J Neurol Sci. 2018 Aug 15;391:72-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 2.
10
Tumefactive multiple sclerosis lesions associated with fingolimod treatment: Report of 5 cases.与芬戈莫德治疗相关的肿块样多发性硬化病变:5 例报告。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Oct;25:95-98. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 19.

疾病修饰治疗停药后复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的疾病再激活。

Disease Reactivation After Cessation of Disease-Modifying Therapy in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

机构信息

From the CORe (I.R., C.M., T.K.), Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne MS Centre (I.R., C.M., T.K.), Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia; Rennes, University (E.L.), EHESP, REPERES EA 7449, France; Univ Rennes (E.L.), CHU Rennes, Inserm, CIC 1414 ([Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Rennes]), France; Université de Lyon (R.C.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France; Hospices Civils de Lyon (R.C.), Service de Neurologie, Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de La Myéline et Neuro-inflammation, Bron, France; Observatoire Français de La Sclérose en Plaques (R.C.), Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR 5292, France; Eugène Devic EDMUS Foundation Against Multiple Sclerosis (R.C.), State-approved Foundation, Bron, France; Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience (D.H., E.K.H.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Czech Republic; Nancy University Hospital (M.D.), Department of Neurology, Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine (M.D.), APEMAC, Nancy, France; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies (F.P.), GF Ingrassia, Catania, Italy; Multiple Sclerosis Center (F.P.), University of Catania, Italy; CHU de Strasbourg (J.D.S.), Department of Neurology and Clinical Investigation Center, CIC 1434, INSERM 1434, Strasbourg, France; Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena (G.I., S.E.), Sevilla, Spain; CHU Pontchaillou (G.E.), CIC1414 INSERM, Rennes, France; CHUM MS Center and Universite de Montreal (A.P., M.G.), Canada; Dokuz Eylul University (S.O.), Konak/Izmir, Turkey; CISSS Chaudière-Appalache (P.G.), Levis, Canada; CHU Lille (H.Z.), CRCSEP Lille, Univ Lille, U1172, France; CHU de Toulouse (J.C.), Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Department of Neurology, CRC-SEP, France; Département de Neurologie (E.M.), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris; CHU de Dijon (T.M.), Department of Neurology, EA4184, France; Department NEUROFARBA (M.P.A.), University of Florence, Italy; CHU de Montpellier (P.L.), MS Unit, France; University of Montpellier (MUSE) (P.L.), France; Division of Neurology (Raed Alroughani), Department of Medicine, Amiri Hospital, Sharq, Kuwait; Department of Neurology (K.B., O.S.), Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University (K.B., O.S.), Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne MS Centre (K.B.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia; The Alfred Hospital (O.S.), Melbourne, Australia; Medical Faculty (M.T.), 19 Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey; CHU de Nantes (D.A.L.), Service de Neurologie & CIC015 INSERM, France; CRTI-Inserm U1064 (D.A.L.), Nantes, France; CHU de Besançon (E.B.), Service de Neurologie 25 030 Besançon, France; Neuro Rive-Sud (F.G.M.), Quebec, Canada; Neurology (C.L.-F.), UR2CA, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pasteur2, Université Nice Côte d'Azur, Nice, France; UOC Neurologia (E.C.), Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale Marche-AV3, Macerata, Italy; KTU Medical Faculty Farabi Hospital (C.B.), Trabzon, Turkey; School of Medicine and Public Health (J.L.-S.), University Newcastle, Australia; Department of Neurology (J.L.-S.), John Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Health, Newcastle, Australia; CHU Clermont-Ferrand (Pierre Clavelou), Department of Neurology; Université Clermont Auvergne, Inserm, Neuro-Dol, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Sorbonne Universités (B.S.), UPMC Paris 06, Brain and Spine Institute, ICM, Hôpital de La Pitié Salpêtrière, Inserm UMR S 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, and Department of Neurology, AP-HP, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France; CSSS Saint-Jérôme (Julie Prevost), Saint-Jerome, Canada; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (L.K.), Departments of Medicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital and University of Basel, Switzerland; Aix Marseille Univ (Jean Pelletier), APHM, Hôpital de La Timone, Pôle de Neurosciences Cliniques, Service de Neurologie, France; Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (V.S.), Iran; Nehme and Therese Tohme Multiple Sclerosis Center (B.I.Y., S.J.K.), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Neurology (Oliver Gerlach), Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands; Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale San Giuseppe Moscati Avellino (D.L.A.S.), Italy; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (V.V.P.), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Fondation Rotschild (Olivier Gout), Department of Neurology, Paris, France; Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital (R.T.), Istanbul, Turkey; Hôpital de Poissy (O.H.), Department of Neurology, France; Department of Neurology (E.T.), Nimes University Hospital, France; Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle (E.T.), UMR5203, INSERM 1191, Univ. Montpellier, France; University of Queensland (P.A.M.), Brisbane, Australia; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (P.A.M.), Australia; Bakirkoy Education and Research Hospital for Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases (A.S.), Istanbul, Turkey; CHU de Rouen (B.B.), Department of Neurology, France; Flinders University (M.S.), Adelaide, Australia; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Biodonostia (T.C.-T.), Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; CHU de Reims (S.B.), Department of Neurology, France; Nemocnice Jihlava (Radek Ampapa), Czech Republic; Monash Medical Centre (E.G.B.), Melbourne, Australia; APHP (A.W.), Hôpital Henri Mondor, Department of Neurology, Créteil, France; Austin Health (R.A.M.), Melbourne, Australia; University Hospital Reina Sofia (E.A.-M.), Cordoba, Spain; CHU de La Martinique (Philippe Cabre), Department of Neurology, Fort-de-France, France; Hôpital Sud Francilien (N.H.B.), Department of Neurology, Corbeil Essonnes, France; Department of Neurology (A.V.W., H.B.), The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Central Clinical School (A.V.W., H.B.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurology (G.L., L.V.H.), University Hospital Ghent, Belgium; Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol (C.M.R.-T.), Badalona, Spain; CHU La Milétrie (N.M.), Hôpital Jean Bernard, Department of Neurology, Poitiers, France; Liverpool Hospital (S.H.), Sydney, Australia; Hospital de Galdakao-Usansolo (J.L.S.-M.), Spain; Brain and Mind Centre (M.H.B.), Sydney, Australia; CHU Bicêtre (C.L.), Department of Neurology, F-94275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Westmead Hospital (Steve Vucic), Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurology (Y.S., R.G.), Razi Hospital, Manouba, Tunisia; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Hungary; Hospital Universitari MútuaTerrassa (J.S.), Barcelona, Spain; Groene Hart Ziekenhuis (K.G.), Gouda, Netherlands; Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (A.A.-A.), Al-Khodh, Oman; Universidade Metropolitana de Santos (Y.D.F.), Santos, Brazil; Service de Neurologie (Sandra Vukusic), Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de La Myéline et Neuro-inflammation, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France; Centre des Neurosciences de Lyon (Sandra Vukusic), Observatoire Français de La Sclérose en Plaques, INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR5292, France; and Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (Sandra Vukusic), Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, France.

出版信息

Neurology. 2022 Oct 25;99(17):e1926-e1944. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201029. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000201029
PMID:35977837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9620810/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the rate of return of disease activity after cessation of multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study from 2 large observational MS registries: MSBase and OFSEP. Patients with relapsing-remitting MS who had ceased a disease-modifying therapy and were followed up for the subsequent 12 months were included in the analysis. The primary study outcome was annualized relapse rate in the 12 months after disease-modifying therapy discontinuation stratified by patients who did, and did not, commence a subsequent therapy. The secondary endpoint was the predictors of first relapse and disability accumulation after treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

A total of 14,213 patients, with 18,029 eligible treatment discontinuation epochs, were identified for 7 therapies. Annualized rates of relapse (ARRs) started to increase 2 months after natalizumab cessation (month 2-4 ARR 0.47, 95% CI 0.43-0.51). Commencement of a subsequent therapy within 2-4 months reduced the magnitude of disease reactivation (mean ARR difference: 0.15, 0.08-0.22). After discontinuation of fingolimod, rates of relapse increased overall (month 1-2 ARR: 0.80, 0.70-0.89) and stabilized faster in patients who started a new therapy within 1-2 months (mean ARR difference: 0.14, -0.01 to 0.29). The magnitude of disease reactivation for other therapies was low but reduced further by commencement of another treatment 1-10 months after treatment discontinuation. Predictors of relapse were a higher relapse rate in the year before cessation, female sex, younger age, and higher EDSS score. Commencement of a subsequent therapy reduced both the risk of relapse (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.72-0.81) and disability accumulation (0.73, 0.65-0.80).

DISCUSSION

The rate of disease reactivation after treatment cessation differs among MS treatments, with the peaks of relapse activity ranging from 1 to 10 months in untreated cohorts that discontinued different therapies. These results suggest that untreated intervals should be minimized after stopping antitrafficking therapies (natalizumab and fingolimod).

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III that disease reactivation occurs within months of discontinuation of MS disease-modifying therapies. The risk of disease activity is reduced by commencement of a subsequent therapy.

摘要

背景与目的

评估多发性硬化症(MS)疾病修正治疗停药后疾病活动的复发率。

方法

这是一项来自 2 个大型 MS 观察性登记处(MSBase 和 OFSEP)的回顾性队列研究。纳入了接受缓解-复发型 MS 治疗并随后随访 12 个月的已停止疾病修正治疗的患者。主要研究结局是根据是否开始后续治疗,将停药后 12 个月的年复发率分层。次要终点是停药后首次复发和残疾累积的预测因素。

结果

共纳入了 14213 例患者,18029 个符合条件的治疗停药期,用于 7 种治疗。停药后 2 个月(2-4 月 ARR0.47,95%CI0.43-0.51)开始出现复发率(ARR)增加。在 2-4 个月内开始使用后续治疗可降低疾病再激活的幅度(ARR 差异的平均值:0.15,0.08-0.22)。停用芬戈莫德后,总体复发率增加(1-2 月 ARR:0.80,0.70-0.89),在 1-2 个月内开始新治疗的患者更快稳定(ARR 差异的平均值:0.14,-0.01 至 0.29)。其他治疗药物的疾病再激活幅度较低,但在停药后 1-10 个月开始使用另一种治疗药物时,进一步降低。复发的预测因素是停药前一年内的复发率较高、女性、年龄较小和 EDSS 评分较高。开始使用后续治疗可降低复发风险(HR0.76,95%CI0.72-0.81)和残疾累积(0.73,0.65-0.80)。

讨论

停药后疾病复发率因 MS 治疗药物而异,停止不同治疗药物后未经治疗的队列中,复发活动的高峰期为 1-10 个月。这些结果表明,停止抗贩运治疗(那他珠单抗和芬戈莫德)后,应尽量缩短无治疗间隔。

分类证据

本研究提供了 III 级证据,表明在多发性硬化症疾病修正治疗停药后几个月内会发生疾病再激活。开始使用后续治疗可降低疾病活动的风险。