Center for Aphasia Research and Treatment, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E. Erie St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Trials. 2022 Aug 17;23(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06627-9.
Studies suggest that language recovery in aphasia may be improved by pairing speech-language therapy with transcranial direct current stimulation. However, results from many studies have been inconclusive regarding the impact transcranial direct current stimulation may have on language recovery in individuals with aphasia. An important factor that may impact the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation is its timing relative to speech-language therapy. Namely, online transcranial direct current stimulation (paired with speech-language therapy) and offline transcranial direct current stimulation (prior to or following speech-language therapy) may have differential effects on language recovery in post-stroke aphasia. Transcranial direct current stimulation provided immediately before speech-language therapy may prime the language system whereas stimulation provided immediately after speech-language therapy may aid in memory consolidation. The main aim of this study is to investigate the differential effects of offline and online transcranial direct stimulation on language recovery (i.e., conversation) in post-stroke aphasia.
METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a randomized, parallel-assignment, double-blind treatment study. Participants will be randomized to one of four treatment conditions and will participate in 15 treatment sessions. All groups receive speech-language therapy in the form of computer-based script practice. Three groups will receive transcranial direct current stimulation: prior to speech-language therapy, concurrent with speech-language therapy, or following speech-language therapy. One group will receive sham stimulation (speech-language therapy only). We aim to include 12 participants per group (48 total). We will use fMRI-guided neuronavigation to determine placement of transcranial direct stimulation electrodes on participants' left angular gyrus. Participants will be assessed blindly at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and at 4 weeks and 8 weeks following treatment. The primary outcome measure is change in the rate and accuracy of the trained conversation script from baseline to post-treatment.
Results from this study will aid in determining the optimum timing to combine transcranial direct current stimulation with speech-language therapy to facilitate better language outcomes for individuals with aphasia. In addition, effect sizes derived from this study may also inform larger clinical trials investigating the impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on functional communication in individuals with aphasia.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03773406. December 12, 2018.
研究表明,将言语语言治疗与经颅直流电刺激相结合可能会改善失语症患者的语言恢复。然而,许多研究的结果对于经颅直流电刺激对失语症患者的语言恢复可能产生的影响尚无定论。一个可能影响经颅直流电刺激疗效的重要因素是其相对于言语语言治疗的时间。即,在线经颅直流电刺激(与言语语言治疗相结合)和离线经颅直流电刺激(在言语语言治疗之前或之后)可能对中风后失语症的语言恢复有不同的影响。在言语语言治疗之前提供的经颅直流电刺激可能会使语言系统初始化,而在言语语言治疗之后提供的刺激可能有助于记忆巩固。本研究的主要目的是研究离线和在线经颅直流电刺激对中风后失语症语言恢复(即对话)的差异影响。
方法/设计:该研究是一项随机、平行分配、双盲治疗研究。参与者将被随机分配到四种治疗条件之一,并将参加 15 次治疗。所有组都接受基于计算机的脚本练习形式的言语语言治疗。三组将接受经颅直流电刺激:在言语语言治疗之前、与言语语言治疗同时进行或在言语语言治疗之后。一组将接受假刺激(仅言语语言治疗)。我们的目标是每组纳入 12 名参与者(共 48 名)。我们将使用 fMRI 引导的神经导航来确定经颅直流电刺激电极在参与者左角回上的位置。参与者将在基线、治疗后即刻以及治疗后 4 周和 8 周进行盲法评估。主要结局指标是从基线到治疗后训练对话脚本的速度和准确性的变化。
本研究的结果将有助于确定将经颅直流电刺激与言语语言治疗相结合以促进失语症患者更好的语言结果的最佳时机。此外,本研究得出的效应大小也可能为更大规模的临床试验提供信息,这些试验将研究经颅直流电刺激对失语症患者功能交流的影响。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03773406。2018 年 12 月 12 日。