• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于急诊科老年人“重要事项”的定性研究。

A Qualitative Study of "What Matters" to Older Adults in the Emergency Department.

机构信息

Yale School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Yale School of Medicine, Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 1;23(4):579-588. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.4.56115.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2022.4.56115
PMID:35980413
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9391017/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The "4Ms" model - What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility - is increasingly gaining attention in age-friendly health systems, yet a feasible approach to identifying what matters to older adults in the emergency department (ED) is lacking. Adapting the "What Matters" questions to the ED setting, we sought to describe the concerns and desired outcomes of both older adult patients seeking ED care and their treating clinicians.

METHODS

We conducted 46 dyadic semi-structured interviews of cognitively intact older adults and their treating clinicians. We used the "What Matters" conversation guide to explore patients' 1) concerns and 2) desired outcomes. We then asked analogous questions to each patient's treating clinician regarding the patient's priorities. Interviews were professionally transcribed and coded using an inductive approach of thematic analysis to identify emergent themes.

RESULTS

Interviews with older adults lasted a mean of three minutes, with a range of 1-8 minutes. Regarding patients' concerns, five themes emerged from older adults: 1) concern through a family member or outpatient clinician recommendation; 2) no concern, with a high degree of trust in the healthcare system; 3) concerns regarding symptom cause identification; 4) concerns regarding symptom resolution; and 5) concerns regarding preservation of their current status. Regarding desired outcomes, five priority themes emerged among older adults: 1) obtaining a diagnosis; 2) returning to their home environment; 3) reducing or resolving symptoms; 4) maintaining self-care and independence; and 5) gaining reassurance. Responding to what they believed mattered most to older adult patients, ED clinicians believed that older adults were concerned primarily about symptom cause identification and resolution and primarily desired a return to the home environment and symptom reduction.

CONCLUSION

This work identifies concerns and desired outcomes of both older adult patients seeking ED care and their treating clinicians as well as the feasibility of incorporating the "What Matters" questions within ED clinical practice.

摘要

简介

“4Ms”模型——重要的事情、药物、思维和活动能力——在老年友善型卫生系统中越来越受到关注,但缺乏一种可行的方法来确定急诊科(ED)老年人关心的问题。我们通过调整“重要的事情”问题来适应 ED 环境,旨在描述寻求 ED 护理的老年患者及其治疗临床医生的关注点和期望结果。

方法

我们对认知功能正常的老年患者及其治疗临床医生进行了 46 次双人半结构化访谈。我们使用“重要的事情”对话指南来探讨患者的 1)关注点和 2)期望结果。然后,我们向每位患者的治疗临床医生询问了关于患者优先级的类似问题。访谈由专业人员转录并进行了主题分析的归纳方法编码,以确定出现的主题。

结果

对老年人的访谈平均持续三分钟,范围为 1-8 分钟。关于患者的关注点,老年人出现了五个主题:1)通过家庭成员或门诊临床医生的推荐而产生的担忧;2)没有担忧,对医疗保健系统高度信任;3)对症状原因识别的担忧;4)对症状缓解的担忧;5)对维持现状的担忧。关于期望的结果,老年人中出现了五个优先主题:1)获得诊断;2)回到他们的家庭环境;3)减轻或缓解症状;4)保持自我护理和独立性;5)获得安心。回应他们认为对老年患者最重要的事情,ED 临床医生认为,老年患者主要关注症状的原因识别和解决,主要期望返回家庭环境并减轻症状。

结论

这项工作确定了寻求 ED 护理的老年患者及其治疗临床医生的关注点和期望结果,以及在 ED 临床实践中纳入“重要的事情”问题的可行性。

相似文献

1
A Qualitative Study of "What Matters" to Older Adults in the Emergency Department.一项关于急诊科老年人“重要事项”的定性研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 1;23(4):579-588. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.4.56115.
2
Older adults' goals of care in the emergency department setting: A qualitative study guided by the 4Ms framework.老年人在急诊科环境中的护理目标:一项以4M框架为指导的定性研究。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 Jul 28;4(4):e13012. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13012. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Usability of the 4Ms Worksheet in the Emergency Department for Older Patients: A Qualitative Study.4Ms 工作表在急诊科老年患者中的可用性:一项定性研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;25(2):230-236. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18088.
4
Emergency department-to-community care transition barriers: A qualitative study of older adults.急诊科到社区护理的过渡障碍:一项针对老年人的定性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Nov;70(11):3152-3162. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17950. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
5
Older patients' perspectives on factors contributing to frequent visits to the emergency department: a qualitative interview study.老年患者对导致频繁急诊就诊因素的看法:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 20;21(1):1709. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11755-z.
6
Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model.确定照护模式以改善有紧急照护需求的老年人的结局:一种开发系统动力学模型的混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(14):1-183. doi: 10.3310/NLCT5104.
7
Balancing safety and harm for older adults with dementia in rural emergency departments: healthcare professionals' perspectives.农村急诊科中痴呆症老年人的安全与伤害平衡:医疗保健专业人员的观点
Rural Remote Health. 2017 Jan-Mar;17(1):4055. doi: 10.22605/rrh4055. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
8
Emergency department staff priorities for improving palliative care provision for older people: A qualitative study.急诊科工作人员改善老年人姑息治疗服务的重点:一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;32(2):417-425. doi: 10.1177/0269216317705789. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
9
Identifying facilitators and barriers to integrated and equitable care for community-dwelling older adults with high emergency department use from historically marginalized groups.确定历史上被边缘化群体中,有高急诊就诊率的社区居住的老年患者,实现整合和公平护理的促进因素和障碍。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 May 19;22(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01900-y.
10
Patients' experiences and reasons for unplanned return visits to the emergency department: A qualitative study.患者急诊非计划性复诊的经历和原因:一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Jul;79(7):2597-2609. doi: 10.1111/jan.15617. Epub 2023 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
What Helps or Hinders Annual Wellness Visits for Detection and Management of Cognitive Impairment Among Older Adults? A Scoping Review Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.哪些因素有助于或阻碍老年人进行年度健康检查以检测和管理认知障碍?一项以实施研究综合框架为指导的范围综述
Nurs Rep. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):295. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15080295.
2
Older Adults' Experiences and Expectations of Doctor-Patient Interactions During Early Hospital Care.老年人在早期住院治疗期间医患互动的经历与期望
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70207. doi: 10.1111/hex.70207.
3
The Age-Friendly Learning Healthcare System: Replicating electronic health record based documentation metrics for 4Ms care.老年友好型学习型医疗保健系统:复制基于电子健康记录的4Ms护理文档指标。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Mar;73(3):707-716. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19311. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
4
Older Adults' Experiences of Emergency Department Admission Decisions: A Qualitative Study in a Public Safety Net Hospital.老年人急诊科入院决策的经历:在一家公共安全网医院进行的定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(7):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09250-3. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
5
"What Matters" in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Analysis of Older Adults' Concerns and Desired Outcomes.急诊科的“重要事项”:老年人关注和期望结果的前瞻性分析。
Med Care. 2024 Dec 1;62(12 Suppl 1):S50-S56. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002053. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
6
The patient-reported outcome measure for older people living with frailty receiving acute care (PROM-OPAC): field-testing and validation.老年人急性护理中衰弱患者报告结局测量工具(PROM-OPAC):现场测试和验证。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Oct 16;8(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00796-8.
7
Enhancing healthcare access for an older population: The age-friendly emergency department.改善老年人群的医疗服务可及性:关爱老年人的急诊科。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 May 8;5(3):e13182. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13182. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing the 4Ms Framework of Age-Friendly Health Systems: A Scoping Review.实施老年友好型卫生系统4M框架的促进因素和障碍:一项范围综述
Nurs Rep. 2024 Apr 15;14(2):913-930. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14020070.
9
Usability of the 4Ms Worksheet in the Emergency Department for Older Patients: A Qualitative Study.4Ms 工作表在急诊科老年患者中的可用性:一项定性研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;25(2):230-236. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18088.
10
Measuring health-related quality of life of older people with frailty receiving acute care: feasibility and psychometric performance of the EuroQol EQ-5D.测量衰弱的急性护理老年人的健康相关生活质量:EuroQol EQ-5D 的可行性和心理测量性能。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Nov 19;23(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00909-4.

本文引用的文献

1
A Longitudinal Analysis of Functional Disability, Recovery, and Nursing Home Utilization After Hospitalization for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions Among Community-Living Older Persons.社区居住老年人因门诊可治疗情况住院后功能障碍、恢复和入住养老院的纵向分析。
J Hosp Med. 2021 Aug;16(8):469-475. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3669.
2
Assessing What Matters Most in Older Adults With Multicomplexity.评估多重复杂性老年患者最重要的问题。
Gerontologist. 2022 Apr 20;62(4):e224-e234. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab071.
3
Applying Geriatric Principles to Transitions of Care in the Emergency Department.将老年医学原则应用于急诊科的医疗照护转接。
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2021 May;39(2):429-442. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
4
Outcome Goals and Health Care Preferences of Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions.患有多种慢性病的老年人的结局目标和医疗保健偏好。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211271. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1271.
5
Understanding patients' end-of-life goals of care in the emergency department.了解急诊科患者的临终护理目标。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Mar 2;2(2):e12388. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12388. eCollection 2021 Apr.
6
Evidence for the 4Ms: Interactions and Outcomes across the Care Continuum.4Ms 的证据:护理连续体中的相互作用和结果。
J Aging Health. 2021 Aug-Sep;33(7-8):469-481. doi: 10.1177/0898264321991658. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
7
Moving Toward a Global Age-Friendly Ecosystem.迈向全球老龄化友好型生态系统
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Sep;68(9):1936-1940. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16675. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
8
Age-Friendly Care At The Emergency Department.老年友善急诊医疗服务。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Nov;38(11):1780-1785. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01202.
9
Goal-Concordant Care - Searching for the Holy Grail.目标一致的照护——探寻圣杯
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 24;381(17):1603-1606. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1908153.
10
PROMIS Physical Function 10-Item Short Form for Older Adults in an Emergency Setting.在紧急情况下老年人 PROMIS 体力功能 10 项简短式量表
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Jun 18;75(7):1418-1423. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz163.