Duke University Health System, Durham, NC.
The Oregon Clinic, Portland, OR.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022 Aug;28(8):468-478. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001225. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are important for measuring quality of care, particularly for interventions aimed at improving symptom bother such as procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. We aimed to create a concise yet comprehensive PRO measurement tool to assess pelvic organ prolapse care in high-volume clinical environments.
The relevant concepts to measure prolapse treatment quality were first established through literature review, qualitative interviews, and a patient and provider-driven consensus-building process. Extant items mapping to these concepts, or domains, were identified from an existing pool of patient-reported symptoms and condition-specific and generic health-related quality of life measures. Item classification was performed to group items assessing similar concepts while eliminating items that were redundant, inconsistent with domains, or overly complex. A consensus meeting was held in March 2020 where patient and provider working groups ranked the remaining candidate items in order of relevance to measure prolapse treatment quality. After subsequent expert review, the revised candidate items underwent cognitive interview testing and were further refined.
Fifteen relevant PRO instruments were initially identified, and 358 items were considered for inclusion. After 2 iterative consensus reviews and 4 rounds of cognitive interviewing with 19 patients, 11 final candidate items were identified. These items map 5 consensus-based domains that include awareness and bother from prolapse, physical function, physical discomfort during sexual activity, pain, and urinary/defecatory symptoms.
We present a concise set of candidate items that were developed using rigorous patient-centered methodology and a national consensus process, including urogynecologic patients and providers.
患者报告的结果(PRO)对于衡量医疗质量很重要,特别是对于旨在改善症状困扰的干预措施,如盆腔器官脱垂的治疗方法。我们旨在创建一个简洁而全面的 PRO 测量工具,以评估高容量临床环境中的盆腔器官脱垂护理。
首先通过文献回顾、定性访谈以及患者和提供者驱动的共识建立过程确定了测量脱垂治疗质量的相关概念。从现有的患者报告的症状和特定于疾病的和通用的健康相关生活质量测量中确定了映射到这些概念或领域的现有项目。进行项目分类,将评估相似概念的项目分组,同时消除冗余、与领域不一致或过于复杂的项目。2020 年 3 月举行了一次共识会议,患者和提供者工作组按照与测量脱垂治疗质量的相关性对剩余的候选项目进行了排序。随后进行了专家审查,修订后的候选项目进行了认知访谈测试并进一步完善。
最初确定了 15 种相关的 PRO 工具,考虑纳入了 358 个项目。经过 2 次迭代共识审查和 4 轮对 19 名患者的认知访谈,确定了 11 个最终的候选项目。这些项目映射了 5 个基于共识的领域,包括对脱垂的认识和困扰、身体功能、性行为时的身体不适、疼痛以及尿便症状。
我们提出了一组简洁的候选项目,这些项目是使用严格的以患者为中心的方法和全国共识过程开发的,包括尿妇科患者和提供者。