College of History and Society, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, Chongqing, China.
School of Marxism, Sichuan International Studies University, Chongqing 400031, Chongqing, China.
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 9;2022:8411999. doi: 10.1155/2022/8411999. eCollection 2022.
Intangible cultural heritage has a unique value. It is very important to evaluate and discover the value of intangible cultural heritage. Therefore, referring to the relevant references of countries around the world, this paper compares the research status of countries around the world with the development trend of China's intangible cultural heritage, indicating that the network resources of intangible cultural heritage can be converted into cultural capital according to the basic theory of cultural capital and then get an economic value. The use value of intangible cultural heritage is analyzed and considered according to IPA entity model analysis, kernel density estimation (KDE), and gray correlation calculation (calculated by using IPA analysis conclusion). Among them, because intangible cultural heritage cannot be measured and verified immediately, indirect measurement verification is carried out by selecting indirect indicators such as the total number of intangible cultural heritage and the development trend of intangible cultural heritage tourism. Based on the gray correlation analysis of the total number and relative density of national intangible cultural heritage and the intangible cultural heritage tourism and related industrial chains, the following proposals for the development trend of intangible cultural heritage are clearly put forward as follows: (1) Further excavate the meaning of "non-material property tourism" and increase the scope of development and design of cultural and art tourism network resources. (2) Make full use of the guiding effect of government departments on "intangible cultural heritage tourism," and improve the normalization of the combination of culture, art, and tourism. (3) Expand the whole industrial chain of "intangible cultural heritage tourism" in an orderly manner, and promote the concept of coordinated and sustainable development of cultural and art tourism.
非物质文化遗产具有独特的价值。评估和发现非物质文化遗产的价值非常重要。因此，本文参考了世界各国的相关参考文献，比较了世界各国的研究现状与中国非物质文化遗产的发展趋势，指出非物质文化遗产的网络资源可以根据文化资本的基本理论转化为文化资本，从而获得经济价值。本文还根据 IPA 实体模型分析、核密度估计（KDE）和灰色关联度计算（使用 IPA 分析结论计算），对非物质文化遗产的使用价值进行了分析和考虑。其中，由于非物质文化遗产无法立即进行测量和验证，因此通过选择非物质文化遗产总数和非物质文化遗产旅游发展趋势等间接指标进行间接测量验证。基于国家级非物质文化遗产总数和相对密度与非物质文化遗产旅游及相关产业链的灰色关联度分析，本文明确提出了非物质文化遗产发展趋势的以下建议：（1）进一步挖掘“非物质财产旅游”的意义，扩大文化艺术旅游网络资源的开发和设计范围。（2）充分利用政府部门对“非物质文化遗产旅游”的引导作用，提高文化、艺术和旅游结合的常态化。（3）有序拓展“非物质文化遗产旅游”的全产业链，促进文化艺术旅游协调可持续发展理念。
