• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Com-On 问卷:一种评估肿瘤学家沟通技巧的问卷的编制与验证。

Com-On Questionnaire: Development and validation of a questionnaire for evaluating communication skills of oncologists.

机构信息

University Hospital, Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13684. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13684. Epub 2022 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1111/ecc.13684
PMID:35985987
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to develop and validate an instrument for assessing the communication skills of oncology physicians from a patient's point of view.

METHODS

A first draft of the questionnaire was compiled based on skills reflecting good physician-patient communication identified in the literature. The questionnaire was critically revised by experts to ensure the validity of its contents. The revised questionnaire was completed by a sample of 153 cancer patients. The questionnaire was developed in German and later translated into English.

RESULTS

After analysis using classical test theory and an exploratory factor analysis, four different factors could be extracted. These factors were labelled setting, patient-centeredness, empathy and consulting competencies. Unsuitable items were eliminated within the analysis. All remaining items hold an appropriate degree of selectivity, item difficulty and reliability/consistency.

CONCLUSION

A novel questionnaire for evaluating communication skills of physicians was developed. It contains 36 items and is named 'Com-On Questionnaire: Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Physician's Communication Skills in Oncology'.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The questionnaire is suitable for measuring both the strengths and deficits within the physician-patient communication in oncology from the patients' perspective.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发并验证一种从患者角度评估肿瘤医师沟通技巧的工具。

方法

根据文献中确定的反映良好医患沟通的技能,编制了问卷初稿。通过专家对问卷进行严格修订,以确保内容的有效性。修订后的问卷由 153 名癌症患者完成。问卷最初以德语编写,然后翻译成英语。

结果

使用经典测试理论和探索性因素分析后,可提取出四个不同的因子。这些因子分别命名为设置、以患者为中心、同理心和咨询能力。在分析过程中,剔除了不合适的项目。所有剩余的项目都具有适当的选择性、项目难度和可靠性/一致性。

结论

开发了一种新的评估医师沟通技巧的问卷,名为“Com-On 问卷:肿瘤医师沟通技巧评估问卷”,包含 36 个项目。

实践意义

该问卷适用于从患者角度测量肿瘤学中医患沟通的优势和缺陷。

相似文献

1
Com-On Questionnaire: Development and validation of a questionnaire for evaluating communication skills of oncologists.Com-On 问卷:一种评估肿瘤学家沟通技巧的问卷的编制与验证。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13684. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13684. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
2
Assessing Communication Skills in Real Medical Encounters in Oncology: Development and Validation of the ComOn-Coaching Rating Scales.评估肿瘤学实际医疗问诊中的沟通技巧:ComOn-Coaching评分量表的开发与验证
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Feb;34(1):73-81. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1269-5.
3
Measuring empathy in pediatrics: validation of the Visual CARE measure.儿科共情测量:视觉关怀量表的验证
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1050-x.
4
Development and evaluation of a checklist assessing communication skills of oncologists: the COM-ON-Checklist.评估肿瘤学家沟通技巧的检查表的制定与评估:COM-ON-Checklist。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Apr;18(2):225-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01556.x. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
5
The Use of Web-Based Patient Reviews to Assess Medical Oncologists' Competency: Mixed Methods Sequential Explanatory Study.利用基于网络的患者评价评估肿瘤内科医生的能力:混合方法序列解释性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 4;7:e39857. doi: 10.2196/39857.
6
Development of the Persian patient satisfaction questionnaire.波斯语患者满意度调查问卷的编制
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018 Oct 8;31(8):988-999. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-06-2017-0101.
7
Patient participation in the medical specialist encounter: does physicians' patient-centred communication matter?患者参与专科医疗会诊:医生以患者为中心的沟通是否重要?
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Mar;65(3):396-406. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.011. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
8
Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Communication Assessment Tool for Use in a Simulated Clinical Setting.用于模拟临床环境的沟通评估工具的跨文化适应性
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jun-Jul;32(3):308-318. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1717958. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
9
Development of the Japanese version of the general practice assessment questionnaire: measurement of patient experience and testing of data quality.日本版全科医疗评估问卷的开发:患者体验测量与数据质量测试
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Nov 28;19(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0873-8.
10
Developing a digital training tool to support oncologists in the skill of information-provision: a user centred approach.开发数字培训工具以支持肿瘤学家提供信息的技能:以用户为中心的方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 May 1;20(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1985-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring self-efficacy in patient-centeredness of physicians in oncology - translation, adaptation and evaluation of psychometric properties of the SEPCQ-27 German version (SEPCQ-24-GER).测量肿瘤学医生以患者为中心的自我效能感——《以患者为中心的自我效能感问卷 - 27项德文版》(SEPCQ - 24 - GER)的翻译、改编及心理测量特性评估
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2468255. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2468255. Epub 2025 Mar 3.