• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据主要意见领袖和卫生专业人员为糖尿病行动目标确定优先顺序。

Establishing priorities for diabetes action goals according to key opinion leaders and health professionals.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine "C", Shamir Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.

Pesach Segal Israeli Center for Diabetes Research and Policy, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.

出版信息

Isr J Health Policy Res. 2022 Aug 19;11(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13584-022-00540-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13584-022-00540-x
PMID:35986364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9392280/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ever-increasing burden of diabetes and the limited resources highlight the need for prioritization of national action goals for diabetes management. The Israeli National Diabetes Council (INDC) initiated a prioritization process aiming to set a top list of diabetes related goals, as suggested by decision makers and health professionals.

METHODS

A 2-step prioritization process, including a small (n = 32) circle of key opinion leaders of the INDC and a larger (n = 195) nationwide circle of diabetes health professionals consisting of physicians, nurses, and dieticians working in diabetes care centers, hospitals and family practice clinics, was established. An online questionnaire presenting 45 different action areas in diabetes prevention and care was distributed to the INDC members who ranked the 3 top diabetes priorities based on their individual interpretation of importance and applicability. The 7 highest ranking priorities were later presented to hospital-based and community diabetes health professionals. These professionals selected the 3 top priorities, based on their perceived importance.

RESULTS

Council members opted mostly for action areas regarding specific populations, such as clinics for adult type-1 diabetes patients, diabetic foot, and pediatric and adolescent patients, while the health professionals' top priorities were mostly in the general field of prevention, namely high-risk prediabetes population, prevention of obesity, and promotion of healthy life-style. In addition, priorities differed between hospital and community health professionals as well as between different professional groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A national prioritization process of action areas in diabetes prevention and care is attainable. The resulting item list is affected by professional considerations. These priorities may direct efforts in the implementation of interventions to improve national-level diabetes management.

摘要

背景

糖尿病负担日益加重,而可用资源有限,这凸显出需要优先考虑国家糖尿病管理行动目标。以色列国家糖尿病理事会(INDC)启动了一项优先级排序流程,旨在根据决策者和卫生专业人员的建议,制定与糖尿病相关的目标的优先清单。

方法

建立了一个两步式优先级排序流程,包括 INDC 的一个小(n=32)核心意见领袖圈子和一个更大(n=195)全国范围内的糖尿病卫生专业人员圈子,这些专业人员包括在糖尿病护理中心、医院和家庭诊所工作的医生、护士和营养师。一个在线问卷向 INDC 成员提出了 45 个不同的糖尿病预防和护理行动领域,他们根据自己对重要性和适用性的个人解释对 3 个最重要的糖尿病优先事项进行排名。随后,这 7 个排名最高的优先事项被提交给基于医院的和社区的糖尿病卫生专业人员。这些专业人员根据他们认为的重要性选择了 3 个最重要的优先事项。

结果

理事会成员主要选择了针对特定人群的行动领域,如成人 1 型糖尿病患者诊所、糖尿病足以及儿科和青少年患者,而卫生专业人员的首要优先事项主要集中在预防的一般领域,即高危糖尿病前期人群、肥胖预防和促进健康的生活方式。此外,医院和社区卫生专业人员之间以及不同专业群体之间的优先事项也存在差异。

结论

可以进行国家糖尿病预防和护理行动领域的优先级排序流程。由此产生的项目清单受到专业考虑的影响。这些优先事项可能会指导努力实施干预措施,以改善国家层面的糖尿病管理。

相似文献

1
Establishing priorities for diabetes action goals according to key opinion leaders and health professionals.根据主要意见领袖和卫生专业人员为糖尿病行动目标确定优先顺序。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2022 Aug 19;11(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13584-022-00540-x.
2
Prioritising target behaviours for research in diabetes: Using the nominal group technique to achieve consensus from key stakeholders.确定糖尿病研究的目标行为优先级:运用名义群体技术达成关键利益相关者的共识。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 6;2:14. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0028-9. eCollection 2016.
3
The top 10 research priorities in diabetes and pregnancy according to women, support networks and healthcare professionals.根据女性、支持网络和医疗保健专业人员的意见,列出糖尿病和妊娠领域的前 10 项研究重点。
Diabet Med. 2021 Aug;38(8):e14588. doi: 10.1111/dme.14588. Epub 2021 May 6.
4
Diabetes care: who are the experts?糖尿病护理:谁是专家?
Qual Health Care. 1992 Dec;1(4):219-24. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.4.219.
5
Top 10 research priorities relating to life after stroke--consensus from stroke survivors, caregivers, and health professionals.中风后生活相关的十大研究重点——中风幸存者、护理人员和健康专业人员的共识
Int J Stroke. 2014 Apr;9(3):313-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00942.x. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
6
Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial.让患者参与医疗保健改进的优先级设定:一项集群随机试验。
Implement Sci. 2014 Feb 20;9:24. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-24.
7
Policy priorities in diabetes care: a Delphi study.糖尿病护理中的政策重点:一项德尔菲研究。
Qual Health Care. 1996 Mar;5(1):3-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.5.1.3.
8
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
9
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
10
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Current Situation Regarding Scientific Fitness Literacy of Nurses in Sports Medicine Integration.运动医学整合中护士科学健身素养的现状分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Oct 1;15:1831-1841. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S378969. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of Diabetes Prevention Interventions Targeting High-risk Individuals and Whole Populations: A Systematic Review.针对高危个体和整个人群的糖尿病预防干预措施的成本效益:系统评价。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jul;43(7):1593-1616. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0018.
2
Five years into the Israeli National Diabetes Program - are we on the right track?以色列国家糖尿病计划实施五年后——我们走在正确的轨道上吗?
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2021 Sep;37(6):e3421. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3421. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
3
The implementation of prioritization exercises in the development and update of health practice guidelines: A scoping review.
优先排序实践在卫生实践指南制定和更新中的应用:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 20;15(3):e0229249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229249. eCollection 2020.
4
Prompting Patients with Poorly Controlled Diabetes to Identify Visit Priorities Before Primary Care Visits: a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.在基层医疗就诊前提示血糖控制不佳的患者确定就诊重点:一项实用的聚类随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jun;34(6):831-838. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4756-4. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
5
Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2017.2017 年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):917-928. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0007. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
6
Setting the top 10 research priorities to improve the health of people with Type 2 diabetes: a Diabetes UK-James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.确定改善2型糖尿病患者健康状况的十大研究重点:英国糖尿病协会-詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目
Diabet Med. 2018 Jul;35(7):862-870. doi: 10.1111/dme.13613. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
7
Global Economic Burden of Diabetes in Adults: Projections From 2015 to 2030.全球成年人糖尿病经济负担:2015 年至 2030 年预测。
Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):963-970. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1962. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
8
Prioritising target behaviours for research in diabetes: Using the nominal group technique to achieve consensus from key stakeholders.确定糖尿病研究的目标行为优先级:运用名义群体技术达成关键利益相关者的共识。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 6;2:14. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0028-9. eCollection 2016.
9
Pre-Visit Prioritization for complex patients with diabetes: Randomized trial design and implementation within an integrated health care system.糖尿病复杂患者就诊前的优先排序:综合医疗保健系统内的随机试验设计与实施
Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Mar;47:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
10
Diabetes Management and Education in Older Adults: The Development of a National Consensus of Key Research Priorities.老年人糖尿病管理和教育:国家关键研究重点共识的制定。
Can J Diabetes. 2016 Feb;40(1):31-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Nov 23.