Suppr超能文献

一项关于老年烧伤患者出院去向的全国性分析——评估出院时独立生活的可能性。

A National Analysis of Discharge Disposition in Older Adults with Burns-Estimating the Likelihood of Independence at Discharge.

机构信息

University of Rochester, New York, USA.

Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2022 Nov 2;43(6):1221-1226. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irac104.

Abstract

Whereas older age predicts higher burn mortality, the impact of age on discharge disposition is less well defined in older adults with burns. This investigation assesses the relationship between older age and discharge disposition after burns in a nationally representative sample. We queried the 2007 to 2015 National Trauma Data Bank for non-fatal burn hospitalizations in older adults. Pre-defined age categories were 55 to 64 years (working-age comparison group), 65 to 74 years (young-old), 75 to 84 years (middle-old), and 85+ years (old-old). Covariables included inhalation injury, comorbidities, burn total body surface area, injury mechanism, and race/ethnicity. Discharge to non-independent living (nursing home, rehabilitation, and other facilities) was the primary outcome. Logistic regression assessed the association between older age and discharge to non-independent living. There were 25,840 non-fatal burn hospitalizations in older adults during the study period. Working-age encounters comprised 53% of admissions, young-old accounted for 28%, middle-old comprised 15% and old-old comprised 4%. Discharge to non-independent living increased with burn TBSA and older age in survivors. Starting in young-old, the majority (65 %) of patients with burns ≥20% TBSA were discharged to non-independent living. Adjusted odd ratios for discharge to non-independent living were 2.0 for young-old, 3.3 for middle-old, and 5.6 for old-old patients, when compared with working-age patients (all P < .001). Older age strongly predicts non-independent discharge after acute burn hospitalization. Matrix analysis of discharge disposition indicates a stepwise rise in discharge to non-independent living with higher age and TBSA, providing a realistic discharge framework for treatment decisions and expectations about achieving independent living after burn hospitalization.

摘要

虽然年龄较大预示着更高的烧伤死亡率,但在烧伤的老年人中,年龄对出院去向的影响定义不明确。本研究在全国代表性样本中评估了老年人烧伤后年龄与出院去向的关系。我们查询了 2007 年至 2015 年全国创伤数据库中年龄在 55 至 64 岁(工作年龄对照组)、65 至 74 岁(年轻老年人)、75 至 84 岁(中年老年人)和 85 岁以上(老年老年人)之间非致命性烧伤住院的情况。预定义的年龄类别为 55 至 64 岁(工作年龄对照组)、65 至 74 岁(年轻老年人)、75 至 84 岁(中年老年人)和 85 岁以上(老年老年人)。协变量包括吸入性损伤、合并症、烧伤总面积、损伤机制和种族/民族。非独立生活(疗养院、康复和其他设施)的出院是主要结果。Logistic 回归评估了年龄与非独立生活出院之间的关系。在研究期间,有 25840 例年龄较大的非致命性烧伤住院患者。工作年龄的遭遇占入院人数的 53%,年轻老年人占 28%,中年老年人占 15%,老年老年人占 4%。在幸存者中,随着烧伤 TBSA 和年龄的增加,非独立生活的出院率增加。从年轻老年人开始,烧伤面积≥20% TBSA 的大多数(65%)患者出院到非独立生活。与工作年龄患者相比,年轻老年人、中年老年人和老年老年人的非独立生活出院的调整比值比分别为 2.0、3.3 和 5.6(均 P <.001)。年龄较大强烈预示着急性烧伤住院后非独立出院。出院去向的矩阵分析表明,随着年龄和 TBSA 的增加,非独立生活的出院率呈阶梯式上升,为治疗决策和烧伤住院后实现独立生活的期望提供了现实的出院框架。

相似文献

3
Long term mortality in critically ill burn survivors.重症烧伤幸存者的长期死亡率。
Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1155-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
9
The measured effect magnitude of co-morbidities on burn injury mortality.共病对烧伤死亡率的测量效应量。
Burns. 2016 Nov;42(7):1433-1438. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Sep 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Telemedicine and Telehealth in Nursing Homes: An Integrative Review.养老院中的远程医疗和远程保健:综合述评。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Sep;22(9):1784-1801.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.02.037. Epub 2021 Apr 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验