Effects of radiant exposure and distance on resin-based composite polymerization.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the hardness profile of three resin-based restorative composites (RBC) (Filtek Z250XT, Filtek One Bulk Fill, Filtek Bulk Fill Flow) polymerized by a multi-wave curing light.

METHODS

Specimens (n= 12) were prepared by inserting 2 mm RBC increments into a split-mold and polymerized from the top using either 20- or 40-second exposure times. Specimen curing was performed directly at a 1 mm distance (control-group) or through an ivorine-tooth slot preparation at a 5 mm distance (experimental-group). Specimens were stored (37 ± 1°C/24 hours), then subjected to Knoop indenter (25g/5 seconds). Specimens' KHN values were obtained from the upper and lower surfaces. Relative hardness (RH) (lower-to-upper ratio) was calculated for each specimen. Data were analyzed with three-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD (α= 0.05).

RESULTS

There was no significant RH difference among RBCs in the control group, regardless of the exposure time (P> 0.05). Average RH ratios for all RBCs tested in this group were greater than 0.80. However, the average RH values of the experimental RBC group were significantly lower. The RH for Z250 was 0.39 in the 20-second group, while RH was 0.63 in the 40-second group. BF had an RH ratio of 0.70 in the 20-second and 0.72 in the 40-second group, while One Bulk had a ratio of 0.65 in the 20-second and 0.71 in the 40-second groups. Doubled exposure time substantially increased RH of all tested materials at a 1 mm tip-to-material distance. Clinically relevant 5 mm light-tip to material-surface distance significantly reduced polymerization efficacy of RBC specimens, regardless of the exposure time.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Adequate light-polymerization of resin-based direct restoratives is necessary for long-term clinical success. Polymerizing Class 2 restorations is challenging due to a hard-to-reach location and an increased distance between the light source and the restorative material. Insufficient polymerization is often seen at the bottom of the proximal box of the Class 2 cavity, with a detrimental effect on restoration longevity.