Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Prevention Research Center for Healthy Neighborhoods at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, the United States of America.
Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, the United States of America.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Oct 1;239:109603. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109603. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
Young adult cigarillo users often cite flavor as a primary reason for initiating and sustaining product use and are more likely to concurrently use other tobacco products such as menthol cigarettes. This study examines substitution with menthol cigarettes among cigarillo users facing a hypothetical ban on flavored cigarillos.
Current young adult (21-28 years) cigarillo users were recruited from October 2020 to April 2021 for an online survey about cigarillo and other tobacco use behaviors. Participants (n = 500) self-reported past or current menthol cigarette experience, and if they would switch to menthol cigarettes if they could not get flavored cigarillos. Logistic regression was used to test differences in switching behaviors by level of experience with menthol cigarettes.
Most young adult cigarillo users (76.8 %) had ever used a menthol cigarette and 46.6 % reported current use of menthol cigarettes. No participant who had never used menthol cigarettes reported they would switch to menthol cigarettes. Current users were 4.2 times as likely to say they would switch after controlling for demographic characteristics and nicotine dependence.
Most young adult cigarillo users reported they would not switch to menthol cigarettes if flavored cigarillos became unavailable. However, participants who currently use or have used menthol cigarettes were more likely to report their intention to switch products than those who had never used menthol cigarettes. There may be a subsequent increase in menthol cigarette use among past menthol cigarette users if policies restricting flavored tobacco products exclude menthol cigarettes, diluting these policies' intended population health impact.
年轻成年小雪茄烟使用者通常将口味作为开始和持续使用产品的主要原因,并且更有可能同时使用其他烟草产品,如薄荷香烟。本研究调查了在假设禁止调味小雪茄的情况下,小雪茄使用者转向薄荷香烟的情况。
从 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 4 月,通过在线调查招募了当前的年轻成年(21-28 岁)小雪茄烟使用者,了解他们关于小雪茄和其他烟草使用行为的情况。参与者(n=500)自我报告过去或当前的薄荷香烟使用经验,如果他们不能获得调味小雪茄,他们是否会转向薄荷香烟。使用逻辑回归检验了薄荷香烟使用经验水平对转向行为的差异。
大多数年轻成年小雪茄烟使用者(76.8%)曾经使用过薄荷香烟,46.6%报告目前使用薄荷香烟。没有从未使用过薄荷香烟的参与者表示他们会转向薄荷香烟。在控制人口特征和尼古丁依赖程度后,当前使用者转向薄荷香烟的可能性是 4.2 倍。
大多数年轻成年小雪茄烟使用者表示,如果调味小雪茄无法获得,他们不会转向薄荷香烟。然而,目前使用或曾经使用过薄荷香烟的参与者比从未使用过薄荷香烟的参与者更有可能报告他们的产品转向意向。如果限制调味烟草产品的政策不包括薄荷香烟,那么过去使用过薄荷香烟的人的薄荷香烟使用量可能会增加,从而削弱这些政策对人口健康的预期影响。