• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对视觉离焦的耐受性。

Tolerance to visual defocus.

作者信息

Legge G E, Mullen K T, Woo G C, Campbell F W

出版信息

J Opt Soc Am A. 1987 May;4(5):851-63. doi: 10.1364/josaa.4.000851.

DOI:10.1364/josaa.4.000851
PMID:3598739
Abstract

Low-resolution optical systems are more tolerant to defocus than are high-resolution systems. We wished to determine whether this principle applies to human vision. We used psychophysical methods to measure the effects of defocus in normal eyes under low-resolution conditions. Modulation transfer of sine-wave gratings was measured as a function of dioptric defocus at low and medium spatial frequencies. We defined the depth of focus at a given spatial frequency to be the dioptric range for which the modulation transfer exceeds 50% of its peak value. For dilated pupils, depth of focus increased from about 2.5 diopters (D) at 3.5 cycles/deg to about 17 D at 0.25 cycles/deg. From our results we predicted that tasks requiring only low spatial frequencies will be more tolerant to defocus than tasks requiring higher spatial frequencies. This prediction was confirmed in a letter-recognition experiment. The increasing tolerance to defocus at low spatial frequencies also implies that individuals with low acuity will be more tolerant to defocus than people with normal vision. We confirmed this prediction by measuring tolerance to defocus in 30 low-vision eyes.

摘要

低分辨率光学系统比高分辨率系统对散焦更具耐受性。我们希望确定这一原理是否适用于人类视觉。我们使用心理物理学方法来测量在低分辨率条件下正常眼睛中散焦的影响。测量了正弦波光栅在低空间频率和中空间频率下的调制传递函数随屈光度散焦的变化。我们将给定空间频率下的焦深定义为调制传递超过其峰值50%的屈光度范围。对于散瞳,焦深从3.5周/度时的约2.5屈光度(D)增加到0.25周/度时的约17 D。根据我们的结果,我们预测,仅需要低空间频率的任务比需要更高空间频率的任务对散焦更具耐受性。这一预测在字母识别实验中得到了证实。在低空间频率下对散焦耐受性的增加也意味着低视力个体比正常视力的人对散焦更具耐受性。我们通过测量30只低视力眼睛对散焦的耐受性证实了这一预测。

相似文献

1
Tolerance to visual defocus.对视觉离焦的耐受性。
J Opt Soc Am A. 1987 May;4(5):851-63. doi: 10.1364/josaa.4.000851.
2
A quantitative investigation into the effects of pupil diameter and defocus on contrast sensitivity for an extended range of spatial frequencies in natural and homatropinized eyes.对自然眼和后马托品化眼在广泛空间频率范围内瞳孔直径和散焦对对比敏感度影响的定量研究。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1987;7(1):21-30.
3
Spatial frequency sweep pattern reversal VER acuity vs Snellen visual acuity: effect of optical defocus.空间频率扫描模式反转视觉诱发电位视力与斯内伦视力对比:光学离焦的影响
Vision Res. 1996 Mar;36(6):903-9. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00187-5.
4
Optical defocus: differential effects on size and contrast letter recognition thresholds.光学散焦:对字母大小和对比度识别阈值的不同影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994 Feb;35(2):646-8.
5
The selective effect of optical defocus on detection and resolution acuity in peripheral vision.光学散焦对周边视觉中检测和分辨敏锐度的选择性影响。
Curr Eye Res. 1996 Mar;15(3):351-3. doi: 10.3109/02713689609007632.
6
Influence of optical defocus on peripheral vision.光学离焦对周边视觉的影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jan 5;52(1):318-23. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5623.
7
Apodization by the Stiles-Crawford effect moderates the visual impact of retinal image defocus.斯泰尔斯-克劳福德效应引起的变迹减弱了视网膜图像散焦的视觉影响。
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1999 Apr;16(4):812-20. doi: 10.1364/josaa.16.000812.
8
Through-focus performance with multifocal contact lenses: effect of binocularity, pupil diameter and inherent ocular aberrations.多焦点接触镜的全程视力表现:双眼视、瞳孔直径和固有眼像差的影响。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013 Jan;33(1):42-50. doi: 10.1111/opo.12004. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
9
Spatial frequency discrimination in normal vision and in patients with multiple sclerosis.正常视力者与多发性硬化症患者的空间频率辨别能力
Brain. 1982 Dec;105 (Pt 4):735-54. doi: 10.1093/brain/105.4.735.
10
Temporal frequency discrimination in optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis.视神经炎和多发性硬化症中的时间频率辨别
Brain. 1985 Sep;108 ( Pt 3):647-76. doi: 10.1093/brain/108.3.647.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined phacovitrectomy for retinal detachment and cataract-macular attachment and visual fixation as predictors of postoperative refractive error.联合晶状体玻璃体切除术治疗视网膜脱离和白内障——黄斑附着及视力固定作为术后屈光不正的预测因素
Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2025 Oct 6;17:25158414251378632. doi: 10.1177/25158414251378632. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
A metric-based image-formation model explains the improvement in subjective refraction using temporal defocus waves.基于度量的图像形成模型解释了使用时间散焦波时主观验光的改善情况。
Optom Vis Sci. 2025 Apr 1;102(4):196-203. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002239. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
3
The effect of 2% pilocarpine on depth of field in different time intervals among presbyopic subjects.
2%毛果芸香碱对老视受试者不同时间间隔景深的影响。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 1;72(12):1795-1797. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_130_24. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
4
Impact of temporal fluctuations in optical defocus on visual acuity: Empirical results and modeling outcomes.光学离焦的时间波动对视力的影响:实证结果和模型结果。
J Vis. 2023 Mar 1;23(3):14. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.3.14.
5
Refractive and visual function changes in twilight conditions.黄昏条件下的屈光和视觉功能变化。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 15;17(4):e0267149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267149. eCollection 2022.
6
Accommodative Response in Patients with Central Field Loss: A Matched Case-Control Study.中心视野缺损患者的调节反应:一项配对病例对照研究。
Vision (Basel). 2021 Jul 9;5(3):35. doi: 10.3390/vision5030035.
7
Lags and leads of accommodation in humans: Fact or fiction?人眼调节的滞后与超前:事实还是虚构?
J Vis. 2021 Mar 1;21(3):21. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.3.21.
8
Factors Influencing Pseudo-Accommodation-The Difference between Subjectively Reported Range of Clear Focus and Objectively Measured Accommodation Range.影响假性调节的因素——主观报告的清晰聚焦范围与客观测量的调节范围之间的差异
Vision (Basel). 2019 Jun 28;3(3):34. doi: 10.3390/vision3030034.
9
The Light Sword Lens - A novel method of presbyopia compensation: Pilot clinical study.光剑透镜 - 一种新型的老视补偿方法:初步临床研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 4;14(2):e0211823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211823. eCollection 2019.
10
Reading Acuity as a Predictor of Low-Vision Reading Performance.视锐度作为低视力阅读表现的预测指标。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Oct 1;59(12):4798-4803. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-24716.