• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从筛查到服务获取:一项定性研究

From Screening to the Receipt of Services: A Qualitative Examination.

机构信息

Center for Healthful Behavior Change, Institute for Excellence in Health Equity, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.

Family Support Services, Family Health Centers at NYU Langone Health, New York, New York.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2022 Sep;63(3 Suppl 2):S144-S151. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.03.033. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2022.03.033
PMID:35987526
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Research has focused on developing methods to facilitate screening and tracking data on social risk factors in healthcare settings. Less is known about the multiple factors that shape patients' acceptance of healthcare-based social risk programs. This qualitative study sought to elucidate the multilevel (individual, interpersonal, family/community, system, policy) factors that influence patients' acceptance of a healthcare-based social risk program within a Federally Qualified Health Center in New York City.

METHODS

Participants included 5 patients receiving care at the Federally Qualified Health Center who screened positive for social risks, 4 nurses who are responsible for conducting social risk screenings, and 5 Family Support Services counselors who conduct outreach to patients who screened positive. Interviews were conducted from March to June 2021 and analyzed from July to September 2021 using the constant comparative method.

RESULTS

Analyses of the transcripts identified the following 3 themes: (1) Patients appreciated being asked about social risk factors, but there was a mismatch between their understanding of the screening process, their desire for assistance, and the support received. Although nurses and counselors described relationship-centered approaches to involve patients in the process, patients reported feeling initial discomfort and confusion; (2) Multilevel barriers inhibit patients' acceptance of assistance; and (3) Patient trust in the physician and healthcare organization serves as facilitators to acceptance.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' views about the purpose of a healthcare-based social risk program differed from nurses' and counselors' perspectives of the process. Although patients face multilevel challenges, strong trust in the physician and Family Health Centers served as facilitators to accepting healthcare-based assistance.

摘要

简介

研究重点是开发方法,以促进在医疗保健环境中筛选和跟踪社会风险因素的数据。对于影响患者接受基于医疗保健的社会风险计划的多种因素知之甚少。这项定性研究旨在阐明影响患者接受位于纽约市的联邦合格健康中心的基于医疗保健的社会风险计划的多层次(个人、人际、家庭/社区、系统、政策)因素。

方法

参与者包括在联邦合格健康中心接受护理且社会风险筛查呈阳性的 5 名患者、负责进行社会风险筛查的 4 名护士以及对筛查呈阳性的患者进行外展的 5 名家庭支持服务顾问。访谈于 2021 年 3 月至 6 月进行,并于 2021 年 7 月至 9 月使用恒定性比较方法进行分析。

结果

对转录本的分析确定了以下 3 个主题:(1)患者对询问社会风险因素表示赞赏,但他们对筛查过程的理解、对援助的渴望与所获得的支持之间存在不匹配。尽管护士和顾问描述了以关系为中心的方法来让患者参与该过程,但患者报告说他们最初感到不适和困惑;(2)多层次的障碍阻碍了患者接受援助;(3)患者对医生和医疗保健组织的信任是接受的促进因素。

结论

患者对基于医疗保健的社会风险计划目的的看法与护士和顾问对该过程的看法不同。尽管患者面临多层次的挑战,但对医生和家庭健康中心的强烈信任是接受基于医疗保健的援助的促进因素。

相似文献

1
From Screening to the Receipt of Services: A Qualitative Examination.从筛查到服务获取:一项定性研究
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Sep;63(3 Suppl 2):S144-S151. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.03.033. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
2
A qualitative analysis of interprofessional healthcare team members' perceptions of patient barriers to healthcare engagement.对跨专业医疗团队成员对患者参与医疗保健的障碍认知的定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 20;16:493. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1751-5.
3
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Assessment of Social Risk Factors and Interest in Receiving Health Care-Based Social Assistance Among Adult Patients and Adult Caregivers of Pediatric Patients.评估社会风险因素以及儿科患者的成年患者和成年照顾者对接受基于医疗保健的社会援助的兴趣。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2021201. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21201.
6
Patient and Community Organization Perspectives on Accessing Social Resources from the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study.患者和社区组织对从急诊科获取社会资源的看法:一项定性研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 24;21(4):964-973. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.3.45932.
7
Hair salons and stylist-client social relationships as facilitators of community-based contraceptive uptake in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a qualitative analysis.南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省的发廊和造型师-客户社交关系促进社区避孕药具的使用:定性分析。
Reprod Health. 2021 Aug 30;18(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01226-4.
8
Screening for Social Risk at Federally Qualified Health Centers: A National Study.在联邦合格健康中心进行社会风险筛查:一项全国性研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 May;62(5):670-678. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.11.008. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
9
Primary care providers' responses to pregnancy intention screening challenges: community-based participatory research at an urban community health centre.基层医疗服务提供者应对妊娠意愿筛查挑战的反应:城市社区卫生中心的基于社区的参与性研究。
Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 18;36(6):797-803. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz027.
10
Barriers to Patients' Acceptance of Social Care Interventions in Clinic Settings.患者在诊所环境中接受社会护理干预的障碍。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Sep;63(3 Suppl 2):S116-S121. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.03.035. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Adopting Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Underserved Communities (ASPIRE): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.在服务不足社区采用自测血压监测(ASPIRE):一项试点随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09646-9.
2
Understanding the Reasons Why Patients With Food Insecurity Decline Social Assistance at a Large Academic Medical Center.了解大型学术医疗中心中粮食不安全患者拒绝社会援助的原因。
AJPM Focus. 2025 Feb 7;4(2):100320. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100320. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Identification of Social Risk-Related Referrals in Discrete Primary Care Electronic Health Record Data: Lessons Learned From a Novel Methodology.
在离散的初级保健电子健康记录数据中识别与社会风险相关的转诊:从一种新方法中学到的经验教训。
Health Serv Res. 2025 May;60 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e14443. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14443. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
4
Social Needs Screening and Intervention in Pediatric Primary Care: Impact on Families' Experience of Care.儿科初级保健中的社会需求筛查和干预:对家庭护理体验的影响。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241255917. doi: 10.1177/21501319241255917.
5
"Addressing the bigger picture": A qualitative study of internal medicine patients' perspectives on social needs data collection and use.“关注大局”:一项针对内科患者对社会需求数据收集和使用的看法的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 7;18(6):e0285795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285795. eCollection 2023.