• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于将响应时间建模为IRT模型中响应参与度的预测因子或指标的多级混合IRT框架。

A Multilevel Mixture IRT Framework for Modeling Response Times as Predictors or Indicators of Response Engagement in IRT Models.

作者信息

Nagy Gabriel, Ulitzsch Esther

机构信息

Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Oct;82(5):845-879. doi: 10.1177/00131644211045351. Epub 2021 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1177/00131644211045351
PMID:35989730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9386881/
Abstract

Disengaged item responses pose a threat to the validity of the results provided by large-scale assessments. Several procedures for identifying disengaged responses on the basis of observed response times have been suggested, and item response theory (IRT) models for response engagement have been proposed. We outline that response time-based procedures for classifying response engagement and IRT models for response engagement are based on common ideas, and we propose the distinction between independent and dependent latent class IRT models. In all IRT models considered, response engagement is represented by an item-level latent class variable, but the models assume that response times either reflect or predict engagement. We summarize existing IRT models that belong to each group and extend them to increase their flexibility. Furthermore, we propose a flexible multilevel mixture IRT framework in which all IRT models can be estimated by means of marginal maximum likelihood. The framework is based on the widespread Mplus software, thereby making the procedure accessible to a broad audience. The procedures are illustrated on the basis of publicly available large-scale data. Our results show that the different IRT models for response engagement provided slightly different adjustments of item parameters of individuals' proficiency estimates relative to a conventional IRT model.

摘要

未参与作答的项目反应对大规模评估结果的有效性构成威胁。已经提出了几种基于观察到的反应时间来识别未参与作答反应的程序,并且也提出了用于反应参与度的项目反应理论(IRT)模型。我们概述了基于反应时间的反应参与度分类程序和反应参与度的IRT模型是基于共同的理念,并且我们提出了独立和非独立潜在类别IRT模型之间的区别。在所有考虑的IRT模型中,反应参与度由项目层面的潜在类别变量表示,但这些模型假设反应时间要么反映要么预测参与度。我们总结了属于每个组的现有IRT模型并对其进行扩展以增加其灵活性。此外,我们提出了一个灵活的多级混合IRT框架,在该框架中所有IRT模型都可以通过边际极大似然法进行估计。该框架基于广泛使用的Mplus软件,从而使该程序可供广大受众使用。这些程序基于公开可用的大规模数据进行了说明。我们的结果表明,相对于传统IRT模型,不同的反应参与度IRT模型对个体能力估计的项目参数进行了略有不同的调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/9386881/a699b926e5c5/10.1177_00131644211045351-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/9386881/2e7e2700b7e1/10.1177_00131644211045351-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/9386881/18f20f7f4337/10.1177_00131644211045351-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/9386881/5f1c304b3033/10.1177_00131644211045351-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/9386881/d1ee47badb4a/10.1177_00131644211045351-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/9386881/a699b926e5c5/10.1177_00131644211045351-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/9386881/2e7e2700b7e1/10.1177_00131644211045351-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/9386881/18f20f7f4337/10.1177_00131644211045351-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/9386881/5f1c304b3033/10.1177_00131644211045351-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/9386881/d1ee47badb4a/10.1177_00131644211045351-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/9386881/a699b926e5c5/10.1177_00131644211045351-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
A Multilevel Mixture IRT Framework for Modeling Response Times as Predictors or Indicators of Response Engagement in IRT Models.一种用于将响应时间建模为IRT模型中响应参与度的预测因子或指标的多级混合IRT框架。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Oct;82(5):845-879. doi: 10.1177/00131644211045351. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
2
The Impact of Test and Sample Characteristics on Model Selection and Classification Accuracy in the Multilevel Mixture IRT Model.测试与样本特征对多级混合IRT模型中模型选择及分类准确性的影响
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 14;11:197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00197. eCollection 2020.
3
Identifying Disengaged Responding in Multiple-Choice Items: Extending a Latent Class Item Response Model With Novel Process Data Indicators.识别多项选择题中不参与作答的情况:利用新型过程数据指标扩展潜在类别项目反应模型
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Apr;84(2):314-339. doi: 10.1177/00131644231169211. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
4
Mixture IRT Model With a Higher-Order Structure for Latent Traits.具有潜在特质高阶结构的混合IRT模型
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Apr;77(2):275-304. doi: 10.1177/0013164416640327. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
5
Investigating the Impact of Item Parameter Drift for Item Response Theory Models with Mixture Distributions.研究项目参数漂移对具有混合分布的项目反应理论模型的影响。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 24;7:255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00255. eCollection 2016.
6
The Q-Matrix Anchored Mixture Rasch Model.Q矩阵锚定混合拉施模型
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 4;12:564976. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.564976. eCollection 2021.
7
IRT Modeling in the Presence of Zero-Inflation With Application to Psychiatric Disorder Severity.存在零膨胀情况下的IRT建模及其在精神疾病严重程度中的应用
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Nov;39(8):583-597. doi: 10.1177/0146621615588184. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
8
A hierarchical latent response model for inferences about examinee engagement in terms of guessing and item-level non-response.一种分层潜在反应模型,用于根据猜测和项目水平非响应推断考生的参与度。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 Nov;73 Suppl 1:83-112. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12188. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
9
General mixture item response models with different item response structures: Exposition with an application to Likert scales.具有不同项目反应结构的通用混合项目反应模型:应用于李克特量表的阐述。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Dec;50(6):2325-2344. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0997-0.
10
The Impact of Non-Normality on Extraction of Spurious Latent Classes in Mixture IRT Models.非正态性对混合IRT模型中虚假潜在类提取的影响。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Mar;40(2):98-113. doi: 10.1177/0146621615605080. Epub 2015 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Bayesian factor mixture modeling with response time for detecting careless respondents.用于检测粗心应答者的带反应时间的贝叶斯因子混合建模。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Sep 15;57(10):286. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02797-x.
2
Polytomous explanatory item response models for item discrimination: Assessing negative-framing effects in social-emotional learning surveys.用于项目区分的多分类解释性项目反应模型:评估社会情感学习调查中的负面框架效应。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Mar 5;57(4):109. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02625-2.
3
A response time-based mixture item response theory model for dynamic item-response strategies.

本文引用的文献

1
On a New Algorithm for Removing Repeating Patterns in Similarity Analysis.一种用于在相似性分析中去除重复模式的新算法。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Jun;80(3):446-460. doi: 10.1177/0013164419882980. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
2
A hierarchical latent response model for inferences about examinee engagement in terms of guessing and item-level non-response.一种分层潜在反应模型,用于根据猜测和项目水平非响应推断考生的参与度。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 Nov;73 Suppl 1:83-112. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12188. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
3
The Onset of Rapid-Guessing Behavior Over the Course of Testing Time: A Matter of Motivation and Cognitive Resources.
一种用于动态项目反应策略的基于反应时间的混合项目反应理论模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 9;57(1):54. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02555-5.
4
Is Effort Moderated Scoring Robust to Multidimensional Rapid Guessing?努力调节评分对多维快速猜测是否稳健?
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 Feb;85(1):134-155. doi: 10.1177/00131644241246749. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
5
The Impact of Insufficient Effort Responses on the Order of Category Thresholds in the Polytomous Rasch Model.多分类Rasch模型中努力反应不足对类别阈值顺序的影响
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Dec;84(6):1203-1231. doi: 10.1177/00131644241242806. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
6
A Comparison of Response Time Threshold Scoring Procedures in Mitigating Bias From Rapid Guessing Behavior.缓解快速猜测行为偏差的反应时间阈值评分程序比较
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Apr;84(2):387-420. doi: 10.1177/00131644231168398. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
7
Identifying Disengaged Responding in Multiple-Choice Items: Extending a Latent Class Item Response Model With Novel Process Data Indicators.识别多项选择题中不参与作答的情况:利用新型过程数据指标扩展潜在类别项目反应模型
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Apr;84(2):314-339. doi: 10.1177/00131644231169211. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
8
State-Aware Deep Item Response Theory using student facial features.使用学生面部特征的状态感知深度项目反应理论。
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Jan 4;6:1324279. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1324279. eCollection 2023.
9
Testing Replicability and Generalizability of the Time on Task Effect.测试任务时间效应的可重复性和普遍性。
J Intell. 2023 Apr 28;11(5):82. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11050082.
10
Accounting for careless and insufficient effort responding in large-scale survey data-development, evaluation, and application of a screen-time-based weighting procedure.在大规模调查数据中考虑粗心和不充分努力的回应——基于屏幕时间的加权程序的开发、评估和应用。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Feb;56(2):804-825. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02053-6. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
测试过程中快速猜测行为的出现:动机与认知资源问题
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 23;10:1533. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01533. eCollection 2019.
4
A mixture model for responses and response times with a higher-order ability structure to detect rapid guessing behaviour.一种用于反应和反应时间的混合模型,具有高阶能力结构以检测快速猜测行为。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 May;73(2):261-288. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12175. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
5
An Overview of Models for Response Times and Processes in Cognitive Tests.认知测试中反应时间与过程的模型概述
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 6;10:102. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00102. eCollection 2019.
6
Response Mixture Modeling: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Item Characteristics across Response Times.反应混合模型:在反应时间内对项目特征的异质性进行核算。
Psychometrika. 2018 Jun;83(2):279-297. doi: 10.1007/s11336-017-9602-9. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
7
Hidden Markov Item Response Theory Models for Responses and Response Times.用于回答和回答时间的隐马尔可夫项目反应理论模型
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016 Sep-Oct;51(5):606-626. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2016.1192983. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
8
A mixture hierarchical model for response times and response accuracy.一种用于反应时间和反应准确性的混合层次模型。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2015 Nov;68(3):456-77. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12054. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
9
Evaluating cognitive theory: a joint modeling approach using responses and response times.评估认知理论:一种使用反应和反应时间的联合建模方法。
Psychol Methods. 2009 Mar;14(1):54-75. doi: 10.1037/a0014877.
10
Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models.使用因子混合模型研究群体异质性。
Psychol Methods. 2005 Mar;10(1):21-39. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21.