• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国城市慢性病患者对家庭医生签约服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验

Preference to Family Doctor Contracted Service of Patients with Chronic Disease in Urban China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

作者信息

Wang Haode, Sun Hui, Jin Chunlin, Wang Meifeng, Luo Yashuang, Song Wenqian, Wang Haiyin

机构信息

Shanghai Health Development Research Center, Shanghai Medical Information Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission; School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Aug 13;16:2103-2114. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S371188. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S371188
PMID:35989974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9384844/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Shanghai is one of the pioneers proposing family doctor contract service (FDCS). However, there is no quantitative research focusing on the Shanghai experience from a demand-side perspective. This study investigated Shanghai chronic patients' relative preferences for FDCS using a discrete choice experiment method.

METHODS

A face-to-face discrete choice experiment (DCE) was performed to elicit the preference with 300 samples. Attributes and levels were extracted from the literature review and focus group consultation with patients. Seven attributes, follow-up frequency, medicine accessibility, family doctor competency, health management, referral convenience, appointment flexibility, and shared decision-making, were decided. Three levels were attached to each attribute. A mixed logit model was used to evaluate the multiple-choice data.

RESULTS

A total of 248 patients completed the survey. Patient valued FDCS medicine accessibility (β=0.57, P < 0.05), and high family doctor competency (β= 0.43, P < 0.05), regular health management activities (β=0.36, P < 0.05), high follow-up frequency (β=0.31, P < 0.05) the most. The good doctor-patient shared decision-making atmosphere (β=0.12, P < 0.05), high referral convenience (β=0.06, P < 0.05) and high appointment flexibility (β=0.04, P < 0.05) are valued as less important. No significant preference heterogeneity was identified for patients with different sociodemographic characteristics. Respondents reported other FDCS needs, including online health consultation, specialist services in local institutes, higher reimbursement rates, free rehabilitation guidance for the disabled and personal health management.

CONCLUSION

This research is the first discrete choice experiment FDCS preference research targeting on Chinese urban population. The results suggested that to increase the quality of FDCS, policy-makers should prioritize follow-up frequency, medicine accessibility, family doctor competency and health management. The service package should consider a higher reimbursement rate and rehabilitation guidance for the disabled if extra health-care resources available. Future FDCS policy should consider stated societal preference and be congruent with it.

摘要

目的

上海是提出家庭医生签约服务(FDCS)的先驱之一。然而,从需求方角度对上海经验进行定量研究的却很少。本研究采用离散选择实验方法调查了上海慢性病患者对家庭医生签约服务的相对偏好。

方法

进行了一项面对面的离散选择实验(DCE),以获取300个样本的偏好。通过文献综述和与患者的焦点小组咨询提取了属性和水平。确定了七个属性,即随访频率、药品可及性、家庭医生能力、健康管理、转诊便利性、预约灵活性和共同决策。每个属性都有三个水平。使用混合logit模型评估多项选择数据。

结果

共有248名患者完成了调查。患者最看重家庭医生签约服务的药品可及性(β=0.57,P<0.05)、家庭医生的高能力(β=0.43,P<0.05)、定期的健康管理活动(β=0.36,P<0.05)以及高随访频率(β=0.31,P<0.05)。良好的医患共同决策氛围(β=0.12,P<0.05)、高转诊便利性(β=0.06,P<0.05)和高预约灵活性(β=0.04,P<0.05)被认为不太重要。不同社会人口学特征的患者未发现显著的偏好异质性。受访者还报告了其他家庭医生签约服务需求,包括在线健康咨询、当地机构的专科服务、更高的报销率、为残疾人提供免费康复指导以及个人健康管理。

结论

本研究是首个针对中国城市人口的家庭医生签约服务偏好的离散选择实验研究。结果表明,为提高家庭医生签约服务质量,政策制定者应优先考虑随访频率、药品可及性、家庭医生能力和健康管理。如果有额外的医疗资源,服务包应考虑提高报销率和为残疾人提供康复指导。未来的家庭医生签约服务政策应考虑既定的社会偏好并与之保持一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8f3/9384844/e39a84f7682c/PPA-16-2103-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8f3/9384844/433cb5a3081c/PPA-16-2103-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8f3/9384844/e39a84f7682c/PPA-16-2103-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8f3/9384844/433cb5a3081c/PPA-16-2103-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8f3/9384844/e39a84f7682c/PPA-16-2103-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Preference to Family Doctor Contracted Service of Patients with Chronic Disease in Urban China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.中国城市慢性病患者对家庭医生签约服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Aug 13;16:2103-2114. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S371188. eCollection 2022.
2
Do Residents and Healthcare Providers Differ in Preference for Family Doctor Contract Service? Evidence From a Discrete Choice Experiment.居民和医疗保健提供者对家庭医生签约服务的偏好是否存在差异?来自离散选择实验的证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 10;10:800042. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.800042. eCollection 2022.
3
Analysing the preferences for family doctor contract services in rural China: a study using a discrete choice experiment.分析中国农村家庭医生签约服务偏好:一项使用离散选择实验的研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jul 25;21(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01223-9.
4
Stated preferences for family doctor contract services: a survey of the rural elderly in Anhui Province, China.家庭医生签约服务的意愿调查:来自中国安徽省农村老年人的调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 3;12(3):e053277. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053277.
5
Barriers and facilitators of family doctor contract services in caring for disabled older adults in Beijing, China: a mixed methods study.中国北京:家庭医生签约服务照顾失能老年人的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法研究
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 1;13(6):e070130. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070130.
6
Public preferences for online medical consultations in China: a discrete choice experiment.公众对中国在线医疗咨询的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 13;11:1282387. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282387. eCollection 2023.
7
Patient Preferences For Specialty Pharmacy Services: A Stated Preference Discrete-Choice Experiment in China.患者对专科药房服务的偏好:中国的一项陈述偏好离散选择实验
Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 9;8:597389. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.597389. eCollection 2020.
8
Urban-rural differences in preferences for traditional Chinese medicine services among chronic disease patients: a discrete choice experiment.城乡慢性病患者对中医药服务偏好的差异:一项离散选择实验。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04659-z.
9
Preferences heterogeneity of health care utilization of community residents in China: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.中国社区居民医疗服务利用的偏好异质性:一项陈述偏好离散选择实验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 18;20(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05134-4.
10
Preferences of Patients with Non-Communicable Diseases for Primary Healthcare Facilities: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Wuhan, China.非传染性疾病患者对基层医疗保健设施的偏好:来自中国武汉的离散选择实验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 4;17(11):3987. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113987.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring tuberculosis patients' preferences for AI-assisted remote health management services in China: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.探索中国结核病患者对人工智能辅助远程健康管理服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 7;15(7):e101918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101918.
2
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
3
Preferences for home-based care services during China's long-term care market transition: evidence from a discrete choice experiment.

本文引用的文献

1
Ten years of China's new healthcare reform: a longitudinal study on changes in health resources.十年中国新医改:卫生资源变化的纵向研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 13;21(1):2272. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12248-9.
2
Willingness of patients with chronic disease in rural China to contract with family doctors: implication for targeting characteristics.中国农村慢性病患者签约家庭医生的意愿:针对特征的启示。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Oct 14;22(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01553-2.
3
Family doctor contract services and health-related quality of life among patients with chronic diseases in rural China: what is the role of socioeconomic status?
中国长期护理市场转型期间对居家护理服务的偏好:来自离散选择实验的证据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 17;25(1):713. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12853-z.
4
Preference for community health services in people with chronic diseases: a discrete choice experiment in China.慢性病患者对社区卫生服务的偏好:一项中国的离散选择实验
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 20;12:1479237. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1479237. eCollection 2024.
5
Patient views of the good doctor in primary care: a qualitative study in six provinces in China.患者眼中的基层好医生:中国 6 省份定性研究
Glob Health Res Policy. 2023 Jul 11;8(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41256-023-00309-y.
家庭医生签约服务对我国农村慢性病患者健康相关生命质量的影响:社会经济地位的作用是什么?
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Aug 26;20(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01530-2.
4
Utilization of community health care centers and family doctor contracts services among community residents: a community-based analysis in Shenzhen, China.社区居民对社区卫生服务中心和家庭医生签约服务的利用情况:基于社区的深圳市分析。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 May 24;22(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01444-6.
5
The developing family doctor system: evidence from the progress of the family doctor signing service from a longitudinal survey (2013-2016) in Pudong New Area, Shanghai.发展中的家庭医生制度:来自上海市浦东新区家庭医生签约服务纵向调查(2013-2016 年)的证据。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01353-0.
6
Patient Choice of Health Care Providers in China: Primary Care Facilities versus Hospitals.中国患者对医疗保健提供者的选择:基层医疗机构与医院。
Health Syst Reform. 2020 Dec 1;6(1):e1846844. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2020.1846844.
7
Prevalence and causes of vision loss in China from 1990 to 2019: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.1990 年至 2019 年中国视力丧失的患病率和病因:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的结果。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Dec;5(12):e682-e691. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30254-1.
8
Effect of family doctor contract services on patient perceived quality of primary care in southern China.家庭医生签约服务对中国南方患者初级保健感知质量的影响。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Oct 24;21(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01287-7.
9
Evaluating the effect of hierarchical medical system on health seeking behavior: A difference-in-differences analysis in China.评价分级诊疗制度对就医行为的影响:中国的双重差分分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jan;268:113372. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113372. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
10
Analysing the preferences for family doctor contract services in rural China: a study using a discrete choice experiment.分析中国农村家庭医生签约服务偏好:一项使用离散选择实验的研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jul 25;21(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01223-9.