Suppr超能文献

2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 8 月期间美国成年人中与食物匮乏相关的干预措施和心理健康状况

Food Insecurity-Related Interventions and Mental Health Among US Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic, April 2020 through August 2021.

机构信息

Department of Public Policy and Public Affairs, John McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA.

Center for Global Health and Health Policy, Global Health and Education Projects, Inc, Riverdale, MD, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 2022 Nov-Dec;137(6):1187-1197. doi: 10.1177/00333549221110294. Epub 2022 Aug 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Financial hardships, job losses, and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic have increased food insecurity. We examined associations between food insecurity-related interventions and mental health among US adults aged ≥18 years from April 2020 through August 2021.

METHODS

We pooled data from the Household Pulse Survey from April 2020 through August 2021 (N = 2 253 567 adults). To estimate associations between mental health and food insecurity, we examined the following interventions: the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Economic Impact Payments (stimulus funds), unemployment insurance, and free meals. We calculated psychological distress index (PDI) scores (Cronbach α = 0.91) through principal components analysis using 4 mental health variables: depression, anxiety, worry, and lack of interest (with a standardized mean score [SD] = 100 [20]). We conducted multivariable linear regression to estimate the interactive effects of the intervention and food insecurity on psychological distress, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics.

RESULTS

During the study period, adults with food insecurity had higher mean PDI scores than adults without food insecurity. Food insecurity was associated with increased PDI scores after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. In stratified models, negative associations between food insecurity and mental health (as shown by reductions in PDI scores) were mitigated by SNAP (-4.5), stimulus fund (-4.1), unemployment insurance (-4.4), and free meal (-4.4) interventions. The mitigation effects of interventions on PDI were greater for non-Hispanic White adults than for non-Hispanic Black or Asian adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research on food insecurity and mental health should include investigations on programs and policies that could be of most benefit to racial and ethnic minority groups.

摘要

目的

新冠疫情期间的经济困难、失业和社会隔离加剧了粮食不安全问题。我们研究了 2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 8 月期间,美国≥18 岁成年人中与粮食不安全相关的干预措施与心理健康之间的关联。

方法

我们汇总了 2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 8 月期间家庭脉搏调查(Household Pulse Survey)的数据(N=2253567 名成年人)。为了估计心理健康与粮食不安全之间的关联,我们研究了以下干预措施:补充营养援助计划(SNAP)、经济影响支付(刺激资金)、失业保险和免费餐食。我们通过主成分分析使用 4 项心理健康变量(抑郁、焦虑、担忧和缺乏兴趣)计算了心理困扰指数(PDI)评分(Cronbach α=0.91)(标准化均数[SD]=100[20])。我们进行了多变量线性回归,以估计干预和粮食不安全对心理困扰的交互影响,同时控制了社会人口特征。

结果

在研究期间,与没有粮食不安全的成年人相比,有粮食不安全的成年人的 PDI 评分均值更高。在控制了社会人口特征后,粮食不安全与 PDI 评分升高有关。在分层模型中,SNAP(-4.5)、刺激资金(-4.1)、失业保险(-4.4)和免费餐食(-4.4)干预措施减轻了粮食不安全与心理健康之间的负相关关系(表现为 PDI 评分降低)。对于非西班牙裔白人成年人,干预措施对 PDI 的缓解作用大于非西班牙裔黑人和亚洲成年人。

结论

未来关于粮食不安全和心理健康的研究应包括对可能对少数族裔最有益的计划和政策的调查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验