Suppr超能文献

在急性单关节炎/少关节炎患者中,针对性超声扫描方案对痛风和焦磷酸钙沉积病的诊断具有很高的准确性。

In patients with acute mono/oligoarthritis, a targeted ultrasound scanning protocol shows great accuracy for the diagnosis of gout and CPPD.

作者信息

Cipolletta Edoardo, Filippucci Emilio, Abhishek Abhishek, Di Battista Jacopo, Smerilli Gianluca, Di Carlo Marco, Silveri Ferdinando, De Angelis Rossella, Salaffi Fausto, Grassi Walter, Di Matteo Andrea

机构信息

Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Apr 3;62(4):1493-1500. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac479.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine an US scanning protocol with the best accuracy for the diagnosis of gout and CPPD in patients with acute mono/oligo-arthritis of unknown origin.

METHODS

Patients with acute mono/oligo-arthritis in whom a joint aspiration at the most clinically involved joint (target joint) was requested were consecutively enrolled. US was performed in each patient before the arthrocentesis. The accuracy of different US findings and scanning protocols for the diagnosis of gout and CPPD was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 161 subjects were included (32 gout patients, 30 CPPD patients and 99 disease-controls). US findings had a high specificity for gout (0.92-0.96) and CPPD (0.90-0.97), while the sensitivity ranged from 0.73 to 0.85 in gout (double contour sign and tophi, respectively) and from 0.60 to 0.90 in CPPD (hyaline and fibrocartilage deposits, respectively). The US assessment of two joints bilaterally (gout: knees, MTP1 joints; CPPD: knees, wrists) plus the target joint had an excellent diagnostic sensitivity (gout: 0.91, CPPD: 0.93) and specificity (gout: 0.91, CPPD: 0.89). This targeted US scanning protocol yielded to higher diagnostic accuracy compared with the US evaluation of the target joint [gout area under the curve (AUC) 0.91 vs 0.84, P = 0.03; CPPD AUC 0.93 vs 0.84, P = 0.04] unless the target joint was the knee or the MTP1 joint in gout and the knee or the wrist in CPPD.

CONCLUSIONS

A targeted US scanning protocol of two joints bilaterally plus the target joint showed an excellent accuracy (>90%) for the diagnosis of crystal arthritis in patients with acute mono/oligoarthritis.

摘要

目的

确定一种对不明原因急性单/寡关节炎患者痛风和焦磷酸钙沉积病(CPPD)诊断准确性最高的超声扫描方案。

方法

连续纳入因急性单/寡关节炎在临床上最受累关节(目标关节)进行关节穿刺的患者。在关节穿刺前对每位患者进行超声检查。计算不同超声表现和扫描方案对痛风和CPPD诊断的准确性。

结果

共纳入161名受试者(32例痛风患者、30例CPPD患者和99例疾病对照)。超声表现对痛风(0.92 - 0.96)和CPPD(0.90 - 0.97)具有较高的特异性,而痛风的敏感性分别为0.73至0.85(双轮廓征和痛风石),CPPD的敏感性分别为0.60至0.90(透明软骨和纤维软骨沉积)。双侧两个关节(痛风:膝关节、第一跖趾关节;CPPD:膝关节、腕关节)加目标关节的超声评估具有出色的诊断敏感性(痛风:0.91,CPPD:0.93)和特异性(痛风:0.91,CPPD:0.89)。与仅对目标关节进行超声评估相比,这种有针对性的超声扫描方案具有更高的诊断准确性[痛风曲线下面积(AUC)0.91对0.84,P = 0.03;CPPD AUC 0.93对0.84,P = 0.04],除非痛风的目标关节是膝关节或第一跖趾关节,以及CPPD的目标关节是膝关节或腕关节。

结论

双侧两个关节加目标关节的有针对性超声扫描方案对急性单/寡关节炎患者晶体性关节炎的诊断具有出色的准确性(>90%)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验