• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项自我引导的在线干预措施促进未满足的父母身份目标的心理社会适应的可行性随机对照试验。

Feasibility randomized controlled trial of a self-guided online intervention to promote psychosocial adjustment to unmet parenthood goals.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Instituto Superior Miguel Torga, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2022 Sep 30;37(10):2412-2425. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac168.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/deac168
PMID:36001052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9527459/
Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Is it feasible to implement and evaluate an online self-guided psychosocial intervention for people with an unmet parenthood goal (UPG), aimed to improve well-being, in an online randomized controlled trial (RCT)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The evaluation of an online bilingual self-guided psychosocial intervention for people with a UPG is feasible, reflected by high demand, good acceptability, good adaptation and promise of efficacy, but minor adjustments to the intervention and study design of the RCT should be made to enhance practicality.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Self-identifying as having a UPG, defined as being unable to have children or as many as desired, is associated with impaired well-being and mental health. Practice guidelines and regulatory bodies have highlighted the need to address the lack of evidence-based support for this population. It is unknown if MyJourney (www.myjourney.pt), the first online self-guided intervention for people with UPGs, can be implemented and evaluated in an RCT.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: To evaluate the feasibility of MyJourney, we conducted a registered, two-arm, parallel group, non-blinded feasibility RCT, with a 1:1 computer-generated randomized allocation and embedded qualitative process evaluation. Participants were included between November 2020 and March 2021. Assessments were made before randomization (T1), 10 weeks (T2) and 6 months after (T3, intervention group only). Participants allocated to the intervention group received an email to access MyJourney immediately after randomization. Participants in the waitlist control group were given access to MyJourney after completing the 10-week assessment (T2).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Participants were recruited via social media advertising of MyJourney and its feasibility study. People who self-identified as having a UPG could click on a link to participate, and of these 235 were randomized. Outcome measures related to demand, acceptability, implementation, practicality, adaptation and limited efficacy were assessed via online surveys. The primary outcome in limited efficacy testing was hedonic well-being, measured with the World Health Organisation Wellbeing Index (WHO-5).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Participation and retention rates were 58.3%, 31.7% (T2) and 45.2% (T3, intervention group only), respectively. Of participants invited to register with MyJourney, 91 (76.5%) set up an account, 51 (47.2%) completed the first Step of MyJourney, 12 (11.1%) completed six Steps (sufficient dose) and 6 (5.6%) completed all Steps within the 10-week recommended period. Acceptability ranged from 2.79 (successful at supporting) to 4.42 (easy to understand) on a 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely acceptable) scale. Average time to complete sufficient dose was 15.6 h (SD = 18.15) and to complete all Steps was 12.4 h (SD = 18.15), with no differences found for participants using MyJourney in Portuguese and English. Modified intention-to-treat analysis showed a moderate increase in well-being from T1 to T2 in the intervention group (ηp2 = 0.156, mean difference (MD) = 9.300 (2.285, 16.315)) and no changes in the control group (ηp2 = 0.000, MD = 0.047 (-3.265, 3.358)). Participants in the process evaluation reported MyJourney was needed and answered their needs for support (reflecting high demand and acceptability), the recommended period to engage with MyJourney was short, and their engagement was influenced by multiple factors, including personal (e.g. lack of time) and MyJourney related (e.g. reminders).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Participants were mostly white, well-educated, employed, childless women. Non-blinded allocation, use of self-reported questionnaire assessments and high attrition in the intervention group could have triggered bias favourable to positive evaluations of MyJourney and resulted in low power to detect T2 to T3 changes in limited efficacy outcomes.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

MyJourney can proceed to efficacy testing, but future work should eliminate barriers for engagement and explore strategies to maximize adherence. Entities wanting to support people with UPGs now have a freely accessible and promising resource that can be further tested and evaluated in different settings.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): MyJourney's development was funded by the charity Portuguese Fertility Association, Cardiff University and University of Coimbra (CINEICC). Dr S.G. reports consultancy fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, speaker fees from Access Fertility, SONA-Pharm LLC, Meridiano Congress International and Gedeon Richter and grants from Merck Serono Ltd. Bethan Rowbottom holds a PhD scholarship funded by the School of Psychology, Cardiff University. The other authors have no conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinical Trials.gov NCT04850482.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd5/9527459/551572dad91a/deac168f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd5/9527459/de0097ae2952/deac168f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd5/9527459/a80fb0158e21/deac168f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd5/9527459/551572dad91a/deac168f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd5/9527459/de0097ae2952/deac168f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd5/9527459/a80fb0158e21/deac168f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd5/9527459/551572dad91a/deac168f3.jpg
摘要

研究问题

在一项在线随机对照试验 (RCT) 中,实施和评估针对未满足育儿目标 (UPG) 的人群的在线自我指导心理社会干预措施以提高幸福感是否可行?

总结答案

评估针对 UPG 人群的双语在线自我指导心理社会干预措施是可行的,这反映在高需求、良好的可接受性、良好的适应性和疗效的潜力上,但干预措施和 RCT 的研究设计应进行一些小的调整,以提高实用性。

已知情况

自我认定为 UPG,定义为无法生育或想要的孩子数量不足,与幸福感和心理健康受损有关。实践指南和监管机构强调需要解决针对这一人群缺乏循证支持的问题。目前尚不清楚第一个针对 UPG 人群的在线自我指导干预措施 MyJourney 是否可以在 RCT 中实施和评估。

研究设计、规模、持续时间:为了评估 MyJourney 的可行性,我们进行了一项已注册的、两臂、平行组、非盲法可行性 RCT,采用 1:1 计算机生成的随机分配和嵌入式定性过程评估。参与者于 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 3 月期间入选。在随机分组前 (T1)、10 周 (T2) 和 6 个月后 (仅干预组的 T3) 进行评估。随机分组后立即向干预组的参与者发送电子邮件以访问 MyJourney。等待对照组的参与者在完成 10 周评估 (T2) 后可访问 MyJourney。

参与者/材料、地点、方法:通过 MyJourney 及其可行性研究的社交媒体广告招募参与者。自我认定为 UPG 的人可以点击链接参与,其中 235 人被随机分组。通过在线调查评估与需求、可接受性、实施、实用性、适应性和有限疗效相关的措施。有限疗效测试的主要结果是幸福感,使用世界卫生组织幸福感指数 (WHO-5) 进行衡量。

主要结果和机遇的作用

参与率和保留率分别为 58.3%、31.7%(T2)和 45.2%(仅干预组的 T3)。邀请注册 MyJourney 的参与者中,91 人(76.5%)注册了账户,51 人(47.2%)完成了 MyJourney 的第一步,12 人(11.1%)完成了六个步骤(足够剂量),6 人(5.6%)在建议的 10 周内完成了所有步骤。可接受性在 2.79(成功支持)到 4.42(易于理解)之间,满分 1(完全不可接受)到 5(非常可接受)。完成足够剂量的平均时间为 15.6 小时(SD=18.15),完成所有步骤的平均时间为 12.4 小时(SD=18.15),使用葡萄牙语和英语的参与者之间没有差异。修改后的意向治疗分析显示,干预组的幸福感从 T1 到 T2 中度增加(ηp2=0.156,MD=9.300(2.285,16.315)),对照组没有变化(ηp2=0.000,MD=0.047(-3.265,3.358))。过程评估中的参与者报告说 MyJourney 是必要的,满足了他们的支持需求(反映了高需求和可接受性),与 MyJourney 互动的推荐时间很短,他们的参与受到多种因素的影响,包括个人因素(例如时间不足)和与 MyJourney 相关的因素(例如提醒)。

局限性、谨慎的原因:参与者主要是白人、受过良好教育、有工作、没有孩子的女性。非盲分配、使用自我报告的问卷调查评估以及干预组的高失访率可能会引发有利于 MyJourney 积极评价的偏差,并导致有限疗效结果的 T2 到 T3 变化的检测能力较低。

更广泛的影响

MyJourney 可以进行疗效测试,但未来的工作应消除参与障碍,并探索提高依从性的策略。希望支持 UPG 人群的实体现在有了一个免费的、有前途的资源,可以在不同的环境中进一步测试和评估。

研究资金/利益冲突:MyJourney 的开发得到了葡萄牙生育协会、卡迪夫大学和科英布拉大学(CINEICC)的慈善机构的资助。S.G. 博士报告了与 Ferring 制药公司、Access Fertility、SONA-Pharm LLC、Meridiano Congress International 和 Gedeon Richter 的咨询费,以及 Merck Serono Ltd. 的资助。Bethan Rowbottom 持有卡迪夫大学心理学系的博士奖学金。其他作者没有利益冲突。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04850482。

相似文献

1
Feasibility randomized controlled trial of a self-guided online intervention to promote psychosocial adjustment to unmet parenthood goals.一项自我引导的在线干预措施促进未满足的父母身份目标的心理社会适应的可行性随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Sep 30;37(10):2412-2425. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac168.
2
Qualitative evaluation of the acceptability and feasibility among healthcare professionals and patients of an ART multi-cycle treatment planning and continuation intervention prototype.定性评估医疗保健专业人员和患者对一种 ART 多周期治疗计划和延续干预原型的可接受性和可行性。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Mar 1;38(3):430-443. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac272.
3
Psychosocial wellbeing shortly after allocation to a freeze-all strategy compared with a fresh transfer strategy in women and men: a sub-study of a randomized controlled trial.在女性和男性中,与新鲜胚胎移植策略相比,分配到冻存所有胚胎策略后不久的心理社会健康状况:一项随机对照试验的子研究。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Nov 2;38(11):2175-2186. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead188.
4
Discussing the possibility of fertility treatment being unsuccessful as part of routine care offered at clinics: patients' experiences, willingness, and preferences.探讨在诊所常规护理中讨论生育治疗不成功的可能性:患者的体验、意愿和偏好。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Jul 5;38(7):1332-1344. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead096.
5
Patient experiences of fertility clinic closure during the COVID-19 pandemic: appraisals, coping and emotions.患者在 COVID-19 大流行期间对生育诊所关闭的体验:评估、应对和情绪。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Nov 1;35(11):2556-2566. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa218.
6
COVID-19-related uncertainty: fertility staff experiences of its sources, processing, responses, and consequences.COVID-19 相关的不确定性:生育医务人员对其来源、处理、应对和后果的体验。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Feb 1;38(2):247-255. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac262.
7
Talking about possible IVF/ICSI failure and need for multiple cycles in treatment planning: qualitative investigation of multi-cycle planning and its acceptability to patients and staff.在治疗计划中探讨可能的 IVF/ICSI 失败和需要多次周期的问题:多周期计划及其对患者和工作人员的可接受性的定性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Mar 1;37(3):488-498. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab278.
8
Recommendations From the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.2023 年多囊卵巢综合征评估和管理国际循证指南推荐。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Sep 18;108(10):2447-2469. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad463.
9
Patient willingness, preferences and decision-making about planning for three complete cycles of IVF/ICSI treatment.患者对计划进行三次完整的 IVF/ICSI 治疗的意愿、偏好和决策。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Apr 20;36(5):1339-1352. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab040.
10
Recommendations from the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.2023 年多囊卵巢综合征评估和管理国际循证指南推荐意见。
Fertil Steril. 2023 Oct;120(4):767-793. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.07.025. Epub 2023 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility testing of socio-culturally relevant counseling techniques based on the Indian epic Ramayana for persons with common mental disorders.基于印度史诗《罗摩衍那》,对患有常见精神障碍的人群进行具有社会文化相关性的咨询技术可行性测试。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;67(6):607-614. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry_535_24. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
2
Systematic Review of the Use of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index Across Different Disease Areas.世界卫生组织-5福祉指数在不同疾病领域应用的系统评价。
Adv Ther. 2025 Aug;42(8):3657-3677. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03266-9. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
3
Protocol for a theory-based, mixed methods evaluation of Cynnau|Ignite: an active learning programme to foster positive research culture through leadership development at Cardiff University.

本文引用的文献

1
Development, implementation and initial feasibility testing of the MediEmo mobile application to provide support during medically assisted reproduction.开发、实施和初步可行性测试 MediEmo 移动应用程序,以在医学辅助生殖过程中提供支持。
Hum Reprod. 2022 May 3;37(5):1007-1017. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac046.
2
When ART fails: figures, experiences, interventions and a plea for the 'plan B'.当 ART 失败时:数字、经验、干预措施以及对“备用方案 B”的呼吁。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Jan;39(1):195-199. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02388-7. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
3
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.
基于理论的Cynnau|Ignite混合方法评估方案:一项通过卡迪夫大学领导力发展促进积极研究文化的主动学习计划。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 27;20(2):e0319020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319020. eCollection 2025.
4
KindMap: an e-mental health tool to promote the well-being and mental health of people facing infertility-study protocol for a feasibility randomised control trial.KindMap:一种促进不孕不育患者身心健康的电子心理健康工具——一项可行性随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 9;14(12):e087447. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087447.
5
Fertility clinics have a duty of care towards patients who do not have children with treatment.生育诊所对那些经过治疗仍未生育子女的患者负有照护责任。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Aug 1;39(8):1591-1598. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae128.
6
Discussing the possibility of fertility treatment being unsuccessful as part of routine care offered at clinics: patients' experiences, willingness, and preferences.探讨在诊所常规护理中讨论生育治疗不成功的可能性:患者的体验、意愿和偏好。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Jul 5;38(7):1332-1344. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead096.
7
Qualitative evaluation of the acceptability and feasibility among healthcare professionals and patients of an ART multi-cycle treatment planning and continuation intervention prototype.定性评估医疗保健专业人员和患者对一种 ART 多周期治疗计划和延续干预原型的可接受性和可行性。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Mar 1;38(3):430-443. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac272.
制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
4
Digital support tools for fertility patients - a narrative systematic review.生育患者的数字支持工具 - 叙事系统评价。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2023 Feb;26(1):17-26. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2021.1953711. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
5
An internet-based mind/body intervention to mitigate distress in women experiencing infertility: A randomized pilot trial.基于互联网的身心干预减轻不孕女性的困扰:一项随机试点试验。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 18;15(3):e0229379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229379. eCollection 2020.
6
Attrition and adherence in smartphone-delivered interventions for mental health problems: A systematic and meta-analytic review.智能手机干预精神健康问题的脱落和坚持情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Jan;88(1):1-13. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000459. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
7
Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements.临床综述:精神健康智能手机应用程序的用户参与情况:证据、理论与改进。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Aug;21(3):116-119. doi: 10.1136/eb-2018-102891. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
8
When time runs out: reconciling permanent childlessness after delayed childbearing.当时间耗尽:延迟生育后如何调和永久性不孕
J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2017 Sep;35(4):342-352. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2017.1320363. Epub 2017 May 9.
9
Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies.为高效随机对照试验提供信息:探索内部预试验进展标准制定中的挑战。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 17;7(2):e013537. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013537.
10
Long-term adjustment to unmet parenthood goals following ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ART 后未满足的亲权目标的长期调整:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2017 May 1;23(3):322-337. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx001.