• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于主动脉疾病文章中使用的标准缩写和首字母缩略词

Toward standard abbreviations and acronyms for use in articles on aortic disease.

作者信息

Perez Zachary G, Zafar Mohammad A, Ziganshin Bulat A, Elefteriades John A

机构信息

Aortic Institute at Yale-New Haven Hospital, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.

Department of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery, Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia.

出版信息

JTCVS Open. 2022 Apr 20;10:34-38. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.04.010. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.xjon.2022.04.010
PMID:36004246
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9390674/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Academic medical literature is fraught with complex article-specific acronyms and abbreviations that can impair communication and make reading arduous. Our goal is to ease frustration with bespoke, inconsistent, and variable sets of abbreviations that currently exist for common aorta-related terminology (eg, anatomy, imaging, disease, and therapy). We hope to ease reading and improve communication in the aortic sphere of cardiovascular literature.

METHODS

We reviewed a total of 205 published references related to aortic disease, including a systematic review of aorta-related articles in the from the years 2020 and 2021. The array of variable definitions, abbreviations, and acronyms encountered in different papers that refer to the same terminology was striking, revealing that there were few standardized abbreviations in the aortic literature. We cataloged these terms, their associated abbreviations, and their frequency of use, and compiled a list of proposed standard abbreviations for commonly used terms that could be implemented uniformly in articles written about aortic diseases.

RESULTS

We present suggested acronyms and abbreviations for common terminology related to the aorta. It is anticipated that this standard list will evolve over time as the literature and technology of the field grows and develops.

CONCLUSIONS

A proposed standard set of acronyms and abbreviations for aorta-related terminology is provided that, if found useful, could be implemented broadly in the aortic literature.

摘要

目的

学术医学文献中充斥着复杂的特定文章首字母缩略词和缩写,这可能会妨碍交流并使阅读变得费力。我们的目标是缓解因目前常见的主动脉相关术语(如解剖学、影像学、疾病和治疗)存在的定制化、不一致且多变的缩写集而产生的挫败感。我们希望减轻心血管文献中主动脉领域的阅读难度并改善交流。

方法

我们总共查阅了205篇与主动脉疾病相关的已发表参考文献,包括对2020年和2021年相关主动脉文章的系统综述。不同论文中针对同一术语所遇到的一系列多变的定义、缩写和首字母缩略词令人惊讶,这表明主动脉文献中几乎没有标准化的缩写。我们对这些术语、其相关缩写及其使用频率进行了编目,并编制了一份建议的常用术语标准缩写列表,这些缩写可在关于主动脉疾病的文章中统一实施。

结果

我们给出了与主动脉相关常见术语的建议首字母缩略词和缩写。预计随着该领域文献和技术的发展,这个标准列表也会与时俱进。

结论

提供了一套针对主动脉相关术语的建议标准首字母缩略词和缩写,如果被证明有用,可在主动脉文献中广泛实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627a/9390674/b7bc004f4bd6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627a/9390674/5d2cf5689425/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627a/9390674/a37392f4f074/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627a/9390674/b7bc004f4bd6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627a/9390674/5d2cf5689425/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627a/9390674/a37392f4f074/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627a/9390674/b7bc004f4bd6/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Toward standard abbreviations and acronyms for use in articles on aortic disease.关于主动脉疾病文章中使用的标准缩写和首字母缩略词
JTCVS Open. 2022 Apr 20;10:34-38. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.04.010. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Using MEDLINE as a knowledge source for disambiguating abbreviations and acronyms in full-text biomedical journal articles.使用MEDLINE作为知识来源来消除全文生物医学期刊文章中缩写词和首字母缩略词的歧义。
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Apr;40(2):150-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Jun 7.
3
Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) Consensus on Spanish Nomenclature for Spondyloarthritis.评估强直性脊柱炎国际学会(ASAS)对西班牙语脊柱关节炎命名法的共识。
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed). 2020 Sep-Oct;16(5 Pt 1):333-338. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
4
What Author Instructions Do Health Journals Provide for Writing Plain Language Summaries? A Scoping Review.健康期刊对撰写通俗易懂的摘要提供了哪些作者指南?一项范围综述。
Patient. 2023 Jan;16(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00606-7. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
5
Medical eponyms versus acronyms: what medical terminology is most beneficial to learn? A question of goals.医学专有名词与首字母缩略词:学习哪种医学术语最有益?这是一个目标问题。
Postgrad Med J. 2024 Sep 22;100(1188):771-775. doi: 10.1093/postmj/qgae059.
6
The growth of acronyms in the scientific literature.科技文献中缩略语的增长。
Elife. 2020 Jul 23;9:e60080. doi: 10.7554/eLife.60080.
7
Nomenclature of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) procedures in urology.泌尿外科自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)及腹腔镜单孔手术(LESS)操作的命名法
J Endourol. 2008 Nov;22(11):2575-81. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0471.
8
Nomenclature of robotic procedures in urology.泌尿外科机器人手术的命名法。
J Endourol. 2008 Jul;22(7):1467-70. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0197.
9
SearCh for humourIstic and Extravagant acroNyms and Thoroughly Inappropriate names For Important Clinical trials (SCIENTIFIC): qualitative and quantitative systematic study.寻找重要临床试验中幽默且夸张的首字母缩略词以及极不合适的名称(科学性研究):定性和定量系统研究。
BMJ. 2014 Dec 16;349:g7092. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7092.
10
Use of acronyms in anaesthetic and associated investigations: appropriate or unnecessary? - the UOAIAAAIAOU Study.在麻醉和相关检查中使用缩写词:合适还是不必要?- UOAIAAAIAOU 研究。
Anaesthesia. 2018 Dec;73(12):1531-1534. doi: 10.1111/anae.14450.

引用本文的文献

1
Wnt16 Promotes Vascular Smooth Muscle Contractile Phenotype and Function via Taz (Wwtr1) Activation in Male LDLR-/- Mice.Wnt16 通过激活 Taz(Wwtr1)促进雄性 LDLR-/- 小鼠血管平滑肌收缩表型和功能。
Endocrinology. 2023 Dec 23;165(2). doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqad192.

本文引用的文献

1
Population-Based Risk Factors for Ascending, Arch, Descending, and Abdominal Aortic Dilations for 60-74-Year-Old Individuals.60-74 岁人群升主动脉、弓部、降主动脉和腹主动脉扩张的基于人群的风险因素。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jul 20;78(3):201-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.094.
2
A new 'angle' towards prediction of type A aortic dissection.预测A型主动脉夹层的新“视角”。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Oct 22;60(4):987-988. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab270.
3
Analysis of ascending aortic diameter and long-term prognosis in patients with ascending aortic dissection.
升主动脉夹层患者升主动脉直径分析及其对长期预后的影响。
Echocardiography. 2021 Apr;38(4):531-539. doi: 10.1111/echo.14980. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
4
Elective replacement of the ascending aorta: is the 5.5-cm threshold appropriate? The insidious, small aorta.升主动脉的选择性置换:5.5 厘米的阈值合适吗?隐匿的小主动脉。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Apr 13;59(3):554-561. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa387.
5
Population-Based Assessment of Aortic-Related Outcomes in Aortic Dissection, Intramural Hematoma, and Penetrating Aortic Ulcer.基于人群的主动脉夹层、壁内血肿和穿透性主动脉溃疡的主动脉相关结局评估。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;69:62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
6
Beyond the term penetrating aortic ulcer: A morphologic descriptor covering a constellation of entities with different prognoses.超越穿透性主动脉溃疡这一术语:一个形态学描述符,涵盖了一系列具有不同预后的实体。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Jul-Aug;63(4):488-495. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
7
Incidence and characteristics of hospitalization for proximal aortic surgery for acute syndromes and for aneurysms in the USA from 2005 to 2014.2005年至2014年美国急性综合征和动脉瘤近端主动脉手术的住院发病率及特征。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Sep 1;58(3):583-589. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa067.
8
Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of maximal aortic diameter, length and volume for prediction of aortic dissection.评估最大主动脉直径、长度和体积对主动脉夹层预测的诊断准确性。
Heart. 2020 Jun;106(12):892-897. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316251. Epub 2020 Mar 8.
9
A review of thoracic aortic aneurysm disease.胸主动脉瘤疾病综述
Echo Res Pract. 2019 Dec 5;7(1):R1-R10. doi: 10.1530/ERP-19-0049. eCollection 2020 Mar.
10
Diagnostic approach and management of genetic aortopathies.遗传性主动脉疾病的诊断方法和处理。
Vasc Med. 2020 Feb;25(1):63-77. doi: 10.1177/1358863X19886361.