Suppr超能文献

超声洁治期间使用吸引装置时气溶胶和飞沫的传播比较:一项初步研究。

Comparative Dissemination of Aerosol and Splatter Using Suction Device during Ultrasonic Scaling: A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Engsomboon Nutthawadee, Pachimsawat Praewpat, Thanathornwong Bhornsawan

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok 10110, Thailand.

Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.

出版信息

Dent J (Basel). 2022 Aug 1;10(8):142. doi: 10.3390/dj10080142.

Abstract

Objective: This study compared the aerosol and splatter diameter and count numbers produced by a dental mouth prop with a suction holder device and a saliva ejector during ultrasonic scaling in a clinical setting. Methodology: Fluorescein dye was placed in the dental equipment irrigation reservoirs with a mannequin, and an ultrasonic scaler was employed. The procedures were performed three times per device. The upper and bottom board papers were placed on the laboratory platform. All processes used an ultrasonic scaler to generate aerosol and splatter. A dental mouth prop with a suction holder and a saliva ejector were also tested. Photographic analysis was used to examine the fluorescein samples, followed by image processing in Python and assessment of the diameter and count number. For device comparison, statistics were used with an independent t-test. Result: When using the dental mouth prop with a suction holder, the scaler produced aerosol particles that were maintained on the upper board paper (mean ± SD: 1080 ± 662 µm) compared to on the bottom board paper (1230 ± 1020 µm). When the saliva ejector was used, it was found that the diameter of the aerosol on the upper board paper was 900 ± 580 µm, and the diameter on the bottom board paper was 1000 ± 756 µm. Conclusion: There was a significant difference in the aerosol and splatter particle diameter and count number between the dental mouth prop with a suction holder and saliva ejector (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the results revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups on the upper and bottom board papers.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了在临床环境中超声洁牙时,带有吸引器装置的牙科开口器和唾液抽吸器产生的气溶胶和飞沫直径及数量。方法:将荧光素染料放入带有人体模型的牙科设备冲洗储液器中,并使用超声洁牙器。每个装置的操作进行三次。在实验室平台上放置上下纸板。所有过程均使用超声洁牙器产生气溶胶和飞沫。还测试了带有吸引器的牙科开口器和唾液抽吸器。采用摄影分析检查荧光素样本,随后在Python中进行图像处理并评估直径和数量。为进行装置比较,使用独立t检验进行统计分析。结果:使用带有吸引器的牙科开口器时,洁牙器产生的气溶胶颗粒在上层纸板上的直径(平均值±标准差:1080±662µm)与在下层纸板上的直径(1230±1020µm)相比有所不同。使用唾液抽吸器时,发现上层纸板上的气溶胶直径为900±580µm,下层纸板上的直径为1000±756µm。结论:带有吸引器的牙科开口器和唾液抽吸器产生的气溶胶和飞沫颗粒直径及数量存在显著差异(p<0.05)。此外,结果显示两组在上层和下层纸板上也存在统计学上的显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3570/9406455/6aa5983a8ba3/dentistry-10-00142-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验