Suppr超能文献

体感刺激对下肢和足部改善中风后平衡和步态的有效性:一项系统评价。

Effectiveness of Somatosensory Stimulation for the Lower Limb and Foot to Improve Balance and Gait after Stroke: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Aries Alison M, Downing Poppy, Sim Julius, Hunter Susan M

机构信息

School of Allied Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK.

Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2022 Aug 19;12(8):1102. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12081102.

Abstract

This systematic review's purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of lower-limb and foot somatosensory stimulation to improve balance and gait post-stroke. PRISMA reporting guidelines were followed. Included studies: randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published in English with ethical approval statement. Studies of conditions other than stroke, functional electrical stimulation, and interventions eliciting muscle contraction, were excluded. AgeLine, AMED, CINAHL PLUS, EMBASE, EMCARE MEDLINE, PEDro, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science and Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched from 1 January 2002 to 31 March 2022. Two authors independently screened results, extracted data and assessed study quality using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool; 16 RCTs ( = 638) were included. Four studies showed a medium or large standardized between-group effect size (Cohen's ) in favor of somatosensory stimulation, in relation to: customized insoles ( = 0.527), taping ( = 0.687), and electrical stimulation (two studies: = 0.690 and = 1.984). Although limited by study quality and heterogeneity of interventions and outcomes, with only one study's results statistically significant, several interventions showed potential for benefit, exceeding the minimally important difference for gait speed. Further research with larger trials is required. This unfunded systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (number CRD42022321199).

摘要

本系统评价的目的是评估下肢和足部体感刺激对改善中风后平衡和步态的有效性。遵循PRISMA报告指南。纳入的研究:随机对照试验(RCT),以英文发表并带有伦理批准声明。排除中风以外疾病、功能性电刺激以及引起肌肉收缩的干预措施的研究。检索了AgeLine、AMED、CINAHL PLUS、EMBASE、EMCARE MEDLINE、PEDro、PsycARTICLES、PsycINFO、SPORTDiscus、科学网和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库,检索时间为2002年1月1日至2022年3月31日。两位作者独立筛选结果、提取数据并使用Cochrane偏倚风险2工具评估研究质量;纳入了16项随机对照试验(n = 638)。四项研究显示,与定制鞋垫(n = 0.527)、贴扎(n = 0.687)和电刺激(两项研究:n = 0.690和n = 1.984)相比,体感刺激在组间效应大小标准化方面有中等或较大的优势。尽管受到研究质量以及干预措施和结果异质性的限制,只有一项研究的结果具有统计学意义,但几种干预措施显示出有益的潜力,超过了步态速度的最小重要差异。需要进行更大规模试验的进一步研究。这项无资金支持的系统评价已在PROSPERO注册(编号CRD42022321199)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3996/9405913/7aa6d8f81f5a/brainsci-12-01102-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验