Pavone Vito, Vescio Andrea, Lucenti Ludovico, Amico Mirko, Caldaci Alessia, Pappalardo Xena Giada, Parano Enrico, Testa Gianluca
Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Section of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Policlinico "Rodolico-San Marco", University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Unit of Catania, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB), National Council of Research, 95100 Catania, Italy.
Children (Basel). 2022 Aug 20;9(8):1257. doi: 10.3390/children9081257.
Child abuse is a critical social issue. The orthopedic surgeon's role is essential in noticing signs and symptoms of physical abuse. For this reason, several authors have proposed scoring systems to identify abuse early on and reduce undiagnosed cases. The aim of this systematic review is to overview the screening tools in the literature. In 2021, three independent authors performed a systematic review of two electronic medical databases using the following inclusion criteria: physical child abuse, questionnaire, survey, score, screening tool and predictive tool. Patients who had experienced sexual abuse or emotional abuse were excluded. The risk of bias evaluation of the articles was performed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale Cohort Studies. Any evidence-level study reporting clinical data and dealing with a physical child abuse diagnosis tool was considered. A total of 217 articles were found. After reading the full texts and checking the reference lists, n = 12 (71,035 patients) articles were selected. A total of seven screening tools were found. However, only some of the seven diagnostic tools included demonstrated a high rate of sensitivity and specificity. The main limits of the studies were the lack of heterogeneity of evidence and samples and the lack of common assessing tools. Despite the multiplicity of questionnaires aimed at detecting validated child abuse, there was not a single worldwide questionnaire for early diagnosis. A combination of more than one test might increase the validity of the investigation.
虐待儿童是一个关键的社会问题。骨科医生在发现身体虐待的迹象和症状方面发挥着至关重要的作用。因此,几位作者提出了评分系统,以便早期识别虐待行为并减少漏诊病例。本系统评价的目的是概述文献中的筛查工具。2021年,三位独立作者使用以下纳入标准对两个电子医学数据库进行了系统评价:儿童身体虐待、问卷、调查、评分、筛查工具和预测工具。曾遭受性虐待或情感虐待的患者被排除在外。根据纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表队列研究对文章进行偏倚风险评估。任何报告临床数据并涉及儿童身体虐待诊断工具的证据水平研究均被纳入考虑。共检索到217篇文章。在阅读全文并检查参考文献列表后,筛选出n = 12篇文章(共71,035名患者)。共发现七种筛查工具。然而,这七种诊断工具中只有一些显示出较高的敏感性和特异性。研究的主要局限性在于证据和样本缺乏异质性,以及缺乏通用的评估工具。尽管有多种旨在检测有效儿童虐待情况的问卷,但尚无一份全球通用的早期诊断问卷。多种测试相结合可能会提高调查的有效性。