MacMillan H L
Canadian Centre for Studies of Children at Risk, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
CMAJ. 2000 Nov 28;163(11):1451-8.
To update the 1993 report from the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination (now the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care) by reviewing the evidence for the effectiveness of interventions aimed at preventing child maltreatment described in the scientific literature over the past 6 years.
Screening: a variety of techniques including assessment of risk indicators.
programs including home visitation; comprehensive health care programs; parent education and support, combined services and programs aimed specifically at preventing sexual abuse.
Occurrence of one or more of the subcategories of physical abuse, sexual abuse, neglect and emotional abuse in childhood.
MEDLINE, PSYCINFO, ERIC and several other databases were searched, experts were consulted, and published recommendations were reviewed. Original research articles and overviews that examined screening for or prevention of child maltreatment were included in the update. No meta-analysis was performed because the range of manoeuvres precluded comparability.
BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Because of the high false-positive rates of screening tests for child maltreatment and the potential for mislabelling people as potential child abusers, the possible harms associated with these screening manoeuvres outweigh the benefits. Two randomized controlled trials showed a reduction in the incidence of childhood maltreatment or outcomes related to physical abuse and neglect among first-time disadvantaged mothers and their infants who received a program of home visitation by nurses in the perinatal period extending through infancy. It is expected that a reduction in incidence of child maltreatment and other outcomes will lead to substantial government savings. Evidence remains inconclusive on the effectiveness of a comprehensive health care program, a parent education and support program, or a combination of services in preventing child maltreatment. Education programs designed to teach children prevention strategies to avoid sexual abuse show increased knowledge and skills but not necessarily reduced abuse.
The systematic review and critical appraisal of the evidence were conducted according to the evidence-based methodology of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
There is further evidence of fair quality to exclude screening procedures aimed at identifying individuals at risk of experiencing or committing child maltreatment (grade D recommendation). There is good evidence to continue recommending a program of home visitation for disadvantaged families during the perinatal period extending through infancy to prevent child abuse and neglect (grade A recommendation). The target group for this program is first-time mothers with one or more of the following characteristics: age less than 19 years, single parent status and low socioeconomic status. The strongest evidence is for an intensive program of home visitation delivered by nurses beginning prenatally and extending until the child's second birthday. There is insufficient evidence to recommend a comprehensive health care program (grade C recommendation), a parent education and support program (grade C recommendation) or a combination of home-based services (grade C recommendation) as a strategy for preventing child maltreatment, but these interventions may be recommended for other reasons. There is insufficient evidence to recommend education programs for the prevention of sexual abuse (grade C recommendation); whether such programs reduce the incidence of sexual abuse has not been established.
The members of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care reviewed the findings of this analysis through an iterative process. The task force sent the final review and recommendations to selected external expert reviewers, and their feedback was incorporated.
The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care is funded through a partnership between the Provincial and Territorial Ministries of Health and Health Canada.
通过回顾过去6年科学文献中所述的旨在预防儿童虐待的干预措施有效性的证据,更新加拿大定期健康检查特别工作组(现加拿大预防性医疗保健特别工作组)1993年的报告。
筛查:包括风险指标评估在内的多种技术。
包括家访;综合医疗保健计划;家长教育与支持、联合服务以及专门针对预防性虐待的计划。
童年期身体虐待、性虐待、忽视和情感虐待等一个或多个子类别事件的发生情况。
检索了MEDLINE、PSYCINFO、ERIC和其他几个数据库,咨询了专家,并审查了已发表的建议。本次更新纳入了研究儿童虐待筛查或预防的原始研究文章和综述。由于操作范围妨碍了可比性,未进行荟萃分析。
益处、危害和成本:由于儿童虐待筛查测试的假阳性率很高,且有可能将人们错误地标记为潜在的儿童虐待者,这些筛查操作可能带来的危害超过了益处。两项随机对照试验表明,对于首次处于不利地位的母亲及其婴儿,在围产期直至婴儿期接受护士家访计划,可降低儿童虐待发生率或与身体虐待和忽视相关的结果发生率。预计儿童虐待发生率及其他结果的降低将为政府节省大量资金。关于综合医疗保健计划、家长教育与支持计划或联合服务在预防儿童虐待方面的有效性,证据仍然不确凿。旨在教导儿童预防策略以避免性虐待的教育计划显示,儿童的知识和技能有所提高,但不一定能减少虐待行为。
根据加拿大预防性医疗保健特别工作组基于证据的方法,对证据进行了系统评价和严格评估。
有更多质量尚可的证据排除旨在识别有遭受或实施儿童虐待风险个体的筛查程序(D级建议)。有充分证据继续建议在围产期直至婴儿期为弱势家庭开展家访计划,以预防儿童虐待和忽视(A级建议)。该计划针对的目标群体是具有以下一个或多个特征的初产妇:年龄小于19岁、单亲身份和社会经济地位低。最有力的证据支持由护士开展的强化家访计划,从产前开始直至孩子两岁生日。没有足够证据推荐综合医疗保健计划(C级建议)、家长教育与支持计划(C级建议)或家庭服务联合计划(C级建议)作为预防儿童虐待的策略,但可因其他原因推荐这些干预措施。没有足够证据推荐预防性虐待的教育计划(C级建议);此类计划是否能降低性虐待发生率尚未确定。
加拿大预防性医疗保健特别工作组的成员通过迭代过程审查了本分析的结果。特别工作组将最终审查和建议发送给选定的外部专家评审员,并纳入了他们的反馈意见。
加拿大预防性医疗保健特别工作组由省和地区卫生部与加拿大卫生部的合作提供资金。