Suppr超能文献

基于多期对比增强计算机断层扫描术前识别胰腺导管腺癌组织学分级的多种影像组学模型比较:中国西南部的一项双中心研究

Comparison of Multiple Radiomics Models for Identifying Histological Grade of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Preoperatively Based on Multiphasic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Two-Center Study in Southwest China.

作者信息

Liao Hongfan, Li Yongmei, Yang Yaying, Liu Huan, Zhang Jiao, Liang Hongwei, Yan Gaowu, Liu Yanbing

机构信息

College of Medical Informatics of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Yixueyuan Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing 400016, China.

Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Aug 8;12(8):1915. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081915.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We designed and validated the value of multiple radiomics models for diagnosing histological grade of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), holding a promise of assisting in precision medicine and providing clinical therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

198 PDAC patients receiving surgical resection and pathological confirmation were enrolled and classified as 117 low-grade PDAC and 81 high-grade PDAC group. An external validation group was used to assess models' performance. Available radiomics features were selected using GBDT algorithm on the basis of the arterial and venous phases, respectively. Five different machine learning models were built including k-nearest neighbour, logistic regression, naive bayes model, support vector machine, and random forest using ten times tenfold cross-validation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to establish clinical model and combined model. The models' performance was assessed according to its predictive performance, calibration curves, and decision curves. A nomogram was established for visualization. Survival analysis was conducted for stratifying the overall survival prior to treatment.

RESULTS

In the training group, the RF model demonstrated the optimal predictive ability and robustness with an AUC of 0.943; the SVM model achieved the secondary performance, followed by Bayes model. In the external validation group, these three models (Bayes, RF, SVM) also achieved the top three predictive ability. A clinical model was built by selected clinical features with an AUC of 0.728, and combined model was established by an RF model and a clinical model with an AUC of 0.961. The log-rank test revealed that the low-grade group survived longer than the high-grade group.

CONCLUSIONS

The multiphasic CECT radiomics models offered an accurate and noninvasive perspective to differentiate histological grade in PDAC and advantages of machine learning models including RF, SVM and Bayes were more remarkable.

摘要

背景

我们设计并验证了多种放射组学模型在诊断胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)组织学分级方面的价值,有望助力精准医学并提供临床治疗策略。

方法

纳入198例接受手术切除及病理确诊的PDAC患者,分为117例低级别PDAC组和81例高级别PDAC组。使用外部验证组评估模型性能。分别基于动脉期和静脉期,采用梯度提升决策树(GBDT)算法选择可用的放射组学特征。使用十倍交叉验证构建了包括k近邻、逻辑回归、朴素贝叶斯模型、支持向量机和随机森林在内的五种不同机器学习模型。应用多变量逻辑回归分析建立临床模型和联合模型。根据模型的预测性能、校准曲线和决策曲线评估模型性能。建立列线图进行可视化。进行生存分析以对治疗前的总生存进行分层。

结果

在训练组中,随机森林(RF)模型表现出最佳的预测能力和稳健性,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.943;支持向量机(SVM)模型性能次之,其次是贝叶斯模型。在外部验证组中,这三种模型(贝叶斯、RF、SVM)也具有前三名的预测能力。通过选择的临床特征构建的临床模型AUC为0.728,由RF模型和临床模型建立的联合模型AUC为0.961。对数秩检验显示低级别组的生存期长于高级别组。

结论

多期对比增强CT(CECT)放射组学模型为区分PDAC的组织学分级提供了准确且无创的视角,包括RF、SVM和贝叶斯在内的机器学习模型优势更为显著。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b71/9406915/3e32197c5b9b/diagnostics-12-01915-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验