Barwa Jyoti, Mittal Anil, Khanna Sunil, Pradhan Gaurav, Singh Rattan, Kumar Ajay, Tanwar Monika
Forensic Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Bathinda, IND.
Forensic Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College (MAMC), New Delhi, IND.
Cureus. 2025 May 27;17(5):e84928. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84928. eCollection 2025 May.
Introduction A number of studies have been conducted worldwide comparing postmortem CT with autopsy findings, highlighting the significance of each. However, the question arises: in countries where such facilities are not available, can diagnostic antemortem CT, performed during treatment, be used as an adjunct to autopsy? This study was carried out to compare antemortem CT scan and autopsy findings of intracranial haemorrhages in cases of fatal head injuries. Materials and methods The study comprised a total of 55 cases of fatal head injuries that were brought for medico-legal postmortem examination at a tertiary care hospital during a period of one year. The various intracranial haemorrhages were duly noted during the autopsy procedure and subsequently compared retrospectively with the respective antemortem CT scan findings. Results and conclusion In the current study, the specificity was found to be 100% for subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), and brain haemorrhage (BH). In contrast to the above-mentioned haemorrhages, specificity was 50% for cerebral contusions. The areas of the temporal lobe, occipital lobe, and cerebellum were poorly visualized on CT scan; hence, the sensitivity of detecting contusions in these sites was 35.7%, 40%, and 30.7%, respectively. Thus, we would like to emphasize that when antemortem CT and autopsy findings are considered together, a wider range of information can be gathered.
引言
全球已开展了多项研究,比较死后CT与尸检结果,突显了二者各自的重要性。然而,问题来了:在没有此类设备的国家,治疗期间进行的诊断性生前CT能否用作尸检的辅助手段?本研究旨在比较致命性头部损伤病例的生前CT扫描与颅内出血的尸检结果。
材料与方法
本研究共纳入55例致命性头部损伤病例,这些病例在一年时间内被送至一家三级护理医院进行法医学尸检。尸检过程中对各种颅内出血进行了详细记录,随后与各自的生前CT扫描结果进行回顾性比较。
结果与结论
在本研究中,蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)、脑内出血(ICH)和脑实质出血(BH)的特异性均为100%。与上述出血情况相反,脑挫伤的特异性为50%。颞叶、枕叶和小脑区域在CT扫描上显示不佳;因此,在这些部位检测挫伤的敏感性分别为35.7%、40%和30.7%。因此,我们想强调,将生前CT和尸检结果综合考虑时,可以收集到更广泛的信息。