• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用“安全上学路”干预措施改变小学生积极参与上学交通方式:快速务实综述。

Changing Primary School Children's Engagement in Active School Travel Using Safe Routes to School Interventions: A Rapid Realist Review.

机构信息

Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Building 23, 11 Kirinari St., Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 12;19(16):9976. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169976.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19169976
PMID:36011609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9408451/
Abstract

Safe Routes to School (SR2S) interventions have been implemented in many economically developed countries to improve children's engagement in Active School Travel (AST). Evaluations have highlighted inconsistencies in SR2S intervention outcomes, raising questions as to how, why, and under what contextual conditions these interventions work. This review used a Rapid Realist Review (RRR) methodology to build, test, and refine an overarching program theory that unpicks the contextual factors and underlying mechanisms influencing children's engagement in AST. From the 45 included documents, 16 refined Context-Mechanism-Outcome Configurations (CMOCs) were developed and clustered into three partial program theories (i.e., implementor/implementation, child, and parent), with the associated mechanisms of: (1) School Reliance; (2) School Priority; (3) Fun; (4) Pride; (5) Perceived Safety; (6) Distrust; (7) Convenience; (8) Perceived Capabilities; and (9) Reassurance. The overarching program theory delineates the pathways between intervention implementation, children's motivation, parental decision-making, and children's engagement in AST. The findings suggest SR2S interventions can motivate children to engage in AST, but whether this motivation is translated into engagement is determined by parental decision-making. This review is novel for highlighting that many of the factors influencing parental decision-making are contextually driven and appear to be unaddressed by the current suite of SR2S intervention strategies. The review additionally highlights the complexity of parental perceptions of safety, with the traffic and the road environment shaping only part of this multidimensional mechanism. Practitioners and policymakers need to tailor SR2S interventions to local contexts to better influence parental decision-making for children's engagement in AST.

摘要

安全上学路 (SR2S) 干预措施已在许多经济发达国家实施,以提高儿童积极上学出行 (AST) 的参与度。评估结果突出了 SR2S 干预措施结果的不一致性,引发了这些干预措施如何、为何以及在何种背景条件下发挥作用的问题。本研究采用快速现实主义审查 (RRR) 方法,构建、测试和完善了一个总体方案理论,该理论揭示了影响儿童参与 AST 的背景因素和潜在机制。从 45 篇纳入的文献中,确定并聚类出了 16 个经过精炼的上下文-机制-结果配置 (CMOC),并将其分为三个部分方案理论(即执行者/实施、儿童和家长),以及相关的机制:(1)学校依赖;(2)学校优先级;(3)乐趣;(4)自豪;(5)感知安全;(6)不信任;(7)方便;(8)感知能力;和(9)安心。总体方案理论描绘了干预措施实施、儿童动机、家长决策和儿童参与 AST 之间的途径。研究结果表明,SR2S 干预措施可以激发儿童参与 AST 的积极性,但这种积极性是否转化为参与,取决于家长的决策。本研究的新颖之处在于强调了影响家长决策的许多因素是由背景驱动的,而当前的一系列 SR2S 干预策略似乎没有解决这些因素。该研究还强调了家长对安全的看法的复杂性,其中交通和道路环境只是这个多维度机制的一部分。实践者和政策制定者需要根据当地情况调整 SR2S 干预措施,以更好地影响家长对儿童参与 AST 的决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44c/9408451/7a1735db0d6d/ijerph-19-09976-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44c/9408451/4ad3b2433e97/ijerph-19-09976-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44c/9408451/8f5924edbeea/ijerph-19-09976-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44c/9408451/7a1735db0d6d/ijerph-19-09976-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44c/9408451/4ad3b2433e97/ijerph-19-09976-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44c/9408451/8f5924edbeea/ijerph-19-09976-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44c/9408451/7a1735db0d6d/ijerph-19-09976-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Changing Primary School Children's Engagement in Active School Travel Using Safe Routes to School Interventions: A Rapid Realist Review.运用“安全上学路”干预措施改变小学生积极参与上学交通方式:快速务实综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 12;19(16):9976. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169976.
2
Understanding child and parent perceptions of barriers influencing children's active school travel.理解儿童和家长对影响儿童积极上学交通的障碍的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):1053. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5874-y.
3
Evaluation of the California Safe Routes to School legislation: urban form changes and children's active transportation to school.加利福尼亚州安全上学路线立法评估:城市形态变化与儿童步行或骑车上学情况
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Feb;28(2 Suppl 2):134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.026.
4
Reliability assessment of the 'field audit for children's active transport routes to school' (FACTS) tool.“儿童上下学路径实地审核”(FACTS)工具的可靠性评估。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):2812. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20285-3.
5
Children's motivation overcame parental hesitation: active school transportation in Sweden.儿童的动力克服了家长的犹豫:瑞典的积极上学交通方式。
Health Promot Int. 2019 Dec 1;34(6):1149-1156. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day083.
6
Assessment of direct and indirect associations between children active school travel and environmental, household and child factors using structural equation modelling.采用结构方程模型评估儿童积极上学出行与环境、家庭和儿童因素之间的直接和间接关联。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Apr 5;16(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0794-5.
7
Validating the Perceived Active School Travel Enablers and Barriers-Parent (PASTEB-P) Questionnaire to Support Intervention Programming and Research.验证感知主动上学出行促进因素和障碍-家长(PASTEB-P)问卷,以支持干预规划和研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 19;20(10):5874. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105874.
8
Children's intervention participation is associated with more positive beliefs towards active school transportation among parents.儿童参与干预措施与家长对积极的学校交通方式的态度更积极有关。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Apr 1;38(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad016.
9
Effectiveness of active school transport interventions: a systematic review and update.积极的学校交通干预措施的效果:系统评价和更新。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 1;18(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-5005-1.
10
Supporting active school travel: A qualitative analysis of implementing a regional safe routes to school program.支持积极的学校出行:对实施区域安全上学路径计划的定性分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Sep;212:181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.032. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability assessment of the 'field audit for children's active transport routes to school' (FACTS) tool.“儿童上下学路径实地审核”(FACTS)工具的可靠性评估。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):2812. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20285-3.
2
Children's active school transportation: an international scoping review of psychosocial factors.儿童积极的学校交通方式:社会心理因素的国际范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 30;13(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02414-y.
3
Children's intervention participation is associated with more positive beliefs towards active school transportation among parents.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimising the delivery of remediation programmes for doctors: A realist review.优化医生补救计划的实施:一个现实主义的回顾。
Med Educ. 2021 Sep;55(9):995-1010. doi: 10.1111/medu.14528. Epub 2021 May 3.
2
Economics of Interventions to Increase Active Travel to School: A Community Guide Systematic Review.增加步行或骑行上学的干预措施的经济学:社区指南系统评价
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jan;60(1):e27-e40. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.002.
3
It's about being the good parent: exploring attitudes and beliefs towards active school transportation.
儿童参与干预措施与家长对积极的学校交通方式的态度更积极有关。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Apr 1;38(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad016.
4
Association between the Duration of the Active Commuting to and from School, and Cognitive Performance in Urban Portuguese Adolescents.城市中葡裔青少年上下学主动通勤时间与认知表现的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15692. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315692.
这是关于成为一个好家长的问题:探讨对积极的学校交通方式的态度和信念。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2020 Dec;79(1):1798113. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2020.1798113.
4
Long-Term Perspectives of a School-Based Intervention to Promote Active School Transportation.促进积极的学校交通的基于学校的干预的长期展望。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 12;17(14):5006. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145006.
5
Children's active outdoor play: 'good' mothering and the organisation of children's free time.儿童积极的户外活动:“好”的母亲教养方式与儿童闲暇时间的组织
Sociol Health Illn. 2020 Jul;42(6):1229-1242. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13107. Epub 2020 May 30.
6
Parental barriers to active transport to school: a systematic review.家长阻碍孩子主动上学的因素:系统综述。
Int J Public Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):87-98. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01313-1. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
7
Parent Perceptions on a Walking School Bus Program Among Low-Income Families: A Qualitative Study.家长对低收入家庭步行校车项目的看法:一项定性研究。
J Phys Act Health. 2019 Nov 1;16(11):1047-1053. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0637. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
8
Interventions promoting active transport to school in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.促进儿童主动上学的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prev Med. 2019 Jun;123:232-241. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.030. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
9
Active School Transportation in Winter Conditions: Biking Together is Warmer.冬季主动式校车上:一起骑车更暖和。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 15;16(2):234. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020234.
10
Realist Synthesis for Public Health: Building an Ontologically Deep Understanding of How Programs Work, For Whom, and In Which Contexts.公共卫生中的现实主义综合:深入了解方案如何运作、针对谁以及在哪些背景下运作。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:361-372. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044451. Epub 2019 Jan 11.