Suppr超能文献

“儿童上下学路径实地审核”(FACTS)工具的可靠性评估。

Reliability assessment of the 'field audit for children's active transport routes to school' (FACTS) tool.

机构信息

Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):2812. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20285-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children's active travel to school is associated with physical activity and thus health. Safe Routes to School (SR2S) programs identify 'safe routes' to promote children's active travel to school. No field audit tool exists specifically to assess the microscale built environment of these 'safe routes' within Australia. This study describes the reliability assessment of the Field Audit for Children's Active Transport to School (FACTS) tool.

METHODS

The FACTS tool was developed using a multi-step process, including a literature search, expert opinion, and pilot testing. For the reliability assessment, two trained auditors collected data at eight schools over three weeks in April 2021. For inter-rater reliability, auditors conducted audits on the 'safe routes' for the same six schools. For intra-rater reliability, auditors conducted repeat measures on the 'safe routes' for four schools each (eight schools total), including three different schools each from the six used for inter-rater reliability and one additional school. Item-by-item reliability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa, Cohen's Weighted Kappa, and percentage agreement. The reliability of calculated domain scores was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

For inter-rater reliability, 31 of the 45 (68.9%) items had moderate to almost perfect agreement, seven items (15.6%) had below moderate agreement, and a Kappa statistic could not be calculated for seven items (15.6%) due to constant values. For intra-rater reliability, 37 of the 45 (82.2%) items had moderate to almost perfect agreement, two items (4.4%) had below moderate agreement, and a Kappa statistic could not be calculated for six items (13.3%) due to constant values. For inter- and intra-rater reliability of the segment domain scores, three of the four domains had substantial to almost perfect agreement. For inter- and intra-rater reliability of the crossing domain scores, all four domains had moderate to almost perfect agreement. For inter- and intra-rater reliability of the segment, crossing, route, and school scores, all had substantial to perfect agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

The FACTS tool can reliably characterise the microscale built environment of promoted 'safe routes' for their use within SR2S programs, and should be considered for use in future SR2S programs within the suburban Australian context.

摘要

背景

儿童积极上学与身体活动有关,从而影响健康。安全路经上学(SR2S)计划确定“安全路经”以促进儿童积极上学。目前在澳大利亚,尚无专门用于评估这些“安全路经”微观建成环境的现场审核工具。本研究描述了儿童主动上学交通现场审核(FACTS)工具的可靠性评估。

方法

FACTS 工具是使用多步骤过程开发的,包括文献检索、专家意见和试点测试。为了进行可靠性评估,两名经过培训的审核员在 2021 年 4 月的三周内对八所学校的“安全路经”进行了数据收集。对于组内可靠性,审核员对六所学校中的同一六所学校的“安全路经”进行了审核。对于组内可靠性,审核员对四所学校的“安全路经”进行了重复测量(八所学校共八所),其中包括六所用于组内可靠性的三所不同学校和一所额外的学校。使用 Cohen's Kappa、Cohen's Weighted Kappa 和百分比一致性评估逐项可靠性。使用组内相关系数评估计算的域得分的可靠性。

结果

对于组内可靠性,45 项中的 31 项(68.9%)具有中度至几乎完美的一致性,7 项(15.6%)具有中度以下的一致性,7 项(15.6%)由于常数而无法计算 Kappa 统计量。对于组内可靠性,45 项中的 37 项(82.2%)具有中度至几乎完美的一致性,2 项(4.4%)具有中度以下的一致性,由于常数,6 项(13.3%)无法计算 Kappa 统计量。对于段域评分的组内和组间可靠性,四个域中的三个具有中度至几乎完美的一致性。对于交叉口域评分的组内和组间可靠性,四个域均具有中度至几乎完美的一致性。对于段、交叉口、路线和学校评分的组内和组间可靠性,所有评分都具有中度至完美的一致性。

结论

FACTS 工具可可靠地描述 SR2S 计划中“安全路经”的微观建成环境特征,应考虑在澳大利亚郊区的未来 SR2S 计划中使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/306e/11472530/874258284ae5/12889_2024_20285_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验