Luiss Business School, Via Nomentana 216, 00162 Rome, Italy.
Department of Communication and Social Research, Sapienza University, Via Salaria 113, 00198 Rome, Italy.
Nutrients. 2022 Aug 19;14(16):3423. doi: 10.3390/nu14163423.
The last decades have been marked by the introduction of front-of-pack labels (FoPL) as an institutional corrective action against obesity and nutrition-related illnesses. However, FoPL-related policy-making initiatives issued by the European Union evolved over time and led to a diversity of labels with different effects on consumers' decisions. As a result, the extant literature adapted to the regulative scenario over the years and investigated the effects of the labels, creating consensus on some topics while being fragmented on others. Similarly, policy-makers adapted some regulations to the evidence supported by the research. With the aim to systematize the overall structure and evolution of the literature on FoPL, investigate the presence of a consensus on specific topics through a co-citation analysis, and examine the evolution of the consensus and co-citation networks over the years and potential research gaps, we report the results of bibliometric and co-citation analyses and a systematic literature review involving 170 papers and a selection of 49 articles published in the last months, for a total of 219 articles, analysed according to three timespans (Period 1 (1989-2011); Period 2 (2012-2016) and Period 3 (2017-2022)). Our findings highlight the interplay of policy development and FoPL research, the presence of few self-reinforcing and well-established co-citation networks based on validated evidence in the literature and the presence of alternative emerging theories that offer different and valid perspectives overlooked by mainstream co-citation research networks.
过去几十年,由于引入了包装正面标签(Front-of-Pack Labels,简称 FoPL)作为针对肥胖和营养相关疾病的机构矫正措施,因此标签的相关政策制定倡议逐渐成为主流。然而,欧盟发布的 FoPL 相关政策制定倡议随着时间的推移而不断发展,导致标签的多样性对消费者的决策产生不同的影响。因此,多年来,相关文献根据监管情况进行了调整,并研究了标签的效果,在一些主题上达成了共识,而在其他主题上则存在分歧。同样,政策制定者根据研究提供的证据调整了一些法规。为了系统地整理 FoPL 文献的整体结构和演变,通过共被引分析调查特定主题的共识情况,并研究多年来共识和共被引网络的演变以及潜在的研究空白,我们报告了文献计量和共被引分析以及系统文献综述的结果,其中包含 170 篇论文和 49 篇最近几个月发表的文章的选择,总共分析了 219 篇文章,根据三个时间段(第 1 期(1989-2011 年);第 2 期(2012-2016 年)和第 3 期(2017-2022 年))进行分析。我们的研究结果强调了政策制定与 FoPL 研究之间的相互作用,基于文献中经过验证的证据,存在着少数自我强化且成熟的共被引网络,以及存在被主流共被引研究网络忽视的替代新兴理论,这些理论提供了不同的有效视角。