Palya Vilmos, Zolnai Anna, Felföldi Balázs
Scientific Support and Investigation Unit, Ceva-Phylaxia Co. Ltd., Szallas utca 5, 1107 Budapest, Hungary.
Ceva Animal Health, 8906 Rosehill Road, Lenexa, KS 66215, USA.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Aug 4;10(8):1255. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10081255.
To investigate the immunogenic cross reactivity between goose parvovirus (GPV) and Muscovy duck parvovirus (MDPV), cross-neutralization was carried out with serum samples collected from birds after infection with one of the two waterfowl parvoviruses. The significantly higher virus neutralization titer obtained against the homologous virus than against the heterologous one suggests important differences between the GPV and MDPV antigenic make up that affects the induced protective virus-neutralizing antibody specificity. This was further confirmed by cross-protection studies carried out in waterfowl parvovirus antibody-free Muscovy ducks immunized at one day of age with whole-virus inactivated oil-emulsion vaccines containing either GPV or MDPV as a monovalent vaccine, or both viruses as a bivalent vaccine. Protection against the clinical disease (growth retardation and feathering disorders) provided by the monovalent vaccine was complete against homologous virus challenge at 2 weeks post-vaccination, while the protection against the heterologous virus challenge was significantly lower (p < 0.001). Only the bivalent vaccine containing both goose and Muscovy duck parvoviruses in an inactivated form protected the birds (90−100%) against both waterfowl parvoviruses that can cause disease in Muscovy ducks. Both the cross-neutralization and cross-protection results indicated that adequate protection in Muscovy ducks against the two waterfowl parvoviruses could be achieved only with a vaccine containing both goose and Muscovy duck parvoviruses. Our results showed that the inactivated vaccine applied at one day of age could induce fast immunity (by 2 weeks post-vaccination), providing complete clinical protection in maternal antibody-free birds. It was also demonstrated that day-old vaccination of ducks with maternal antibodies with bivalent vaccine induced active immunity, resulting in 90 to 100% protection by 3 weeks of age, after the decline of maternal antibodies. A booster vaccination administered at 3 weeks of age following the day-old vaccination resulted in a strong and durable immunity against the clinical disease during the susceptible age of the birds.
为研究鹅细小病毒(GPV)和番鸭细小病毒(MDPV)之间的免疫交叉反应性,用感染两种水禽细小病毒之一后的鸟类血清样本进行了交叉中和试验。针对同源病毒获得的病毒中和效价显著高于异源病毒,这表明GPV和MDPV抗原组成存在重要差异,影响诱导产生的保护性病毒中和抗体的特异性。在1日龄无水禽细小病毒抗体的番鸭中进行的交叉保护研究进一步证实了这一点,这些番鸭用含有GPV或MDPV的单价疫苗或两种病毒的双价疫苗的全病毒灭活油乳剂疫苗进行免疫。单价疫苗在接种后2周对同源病毒攻击提供的临床疾病(生长迟缓及羽毛发育障碍)保护是完全的,而对异源病毒攻击的保护则显著较低(p<0.001)。只有含有灭活形式的鹅和番鸭细小病毒的双价疫苗能保护鸟类(90−100%)免受两种可导致番鸭发病的水禽细小病毒的侵害。交叉中和和交叉保护结果均表明,只有使用含有鹅和番鸭细小病毒的疫苗才能在番鸭中获得针对这两种水禽细小病毒的充分保护。我们的结果表明,1日龄接种的灭活疫苗可诱导快速免疫(接种后2周),在无母源抗体的鸟类中提供完全的临床保护。还证明,用双价疫苗对有母源抗体的1日龄雏鸭进行接种可诱导主动免疫,在母源抗体下降后,到3周龄时可提供90%至100%的保护。在1日龄接种后3周龄进行加强免疫,可在鸟类易感年龄期间产生针对临床疾病的强大而持久的免疫力。