Suppr超能文献

心律失常特异性问卷英文版在心动过速和心律失常中的验证(ASTA):一项Rasch评估研究。

Validation of the English version of the arrhythmia-specific questionnaire in tachycardia and arrhythmia (ASTA): a Rasch evaluation study.

作者信息

Walfridsson Ulla, Walfridsson Håkan, Middeldorp Melissa E, Sanders Prashanthan, Årestedt Kristofer

机构信息

Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Aug 26;6(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00493-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures are important in person-centered care, providing valuable information about patients' experiences. Disease-specific questionnaires add important information about a certain disease in comparison to generic questionnaires. Questionnaires need to be validated in the targeted population to achieve reliable data. The purpose with the study was to use Rasch measurement theory to evaluate the English version of the ASTA questionnaire.

METHODS

The Rasch model theory was used to evaluate global and item fit, targeting, response category functioning, local independency, unidimensionality, differential item functioning (DIF) for gender and age, and reliability.

RESULTS

The study included 202 patients undergoing DC conversion or catheter ablation at the Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders at the University of Adelaide, Australia. The mean age was 67 years and 30% were women. Most patients had atrial fibrillation (n = 179), others had atrial flutter or had a combination. One of nine items demonstrated unsatisfactory model fit in the ASTA Symptom scale and two of 13 in the ASTA Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) scale. Unidimensionality was supported for both scales. The targeting was acceptable except for the lower end of the scales. Both scales showed reversed thresholds for the response categories "quite a lot" and "a lot" (eight of ASTA symptoms and 12 of ASTA HRQoL items). Some problems with local dependency were detected in both scales. The reliability (person separation index) was satisfactory: 0.75 for the ASTA symptom scale and 0.77 for the ASTA HRQoL scale. No DIF for gender and age were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The English version of the ASTA questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory measurement properties according to the Rasch model. However, it needs to be evaluated in patients with other arrhythmias. The response categories should be considered as well as DIF in further validation. The ASTA questionnaire can be used for assessments of symptoms and HRQoL between groups of different ages and genders in patients with arrhythmia.

摘要

背景

患者报告的结局指标在以患者为中心的医疗中很重要,可提供有关患者体验的有价值信息。与通用问卷相比,特定疾病问卷可补充有关某种疾病的重要信息。问卷需要在目标人群中进行验证以获得可靠数据。本研究的目的是使用拉施测量理论评估ASTA问卷的英文版本。

方法

使用拉施模型理论评估整体和项目拟合、目标定位、反应类别功能、局部独立性、单维性、性别和年龄的项目功能差异(DIF)以及信度。

结果

该研究纳入了澳大利亚阿德莱德大学心律紊乱中心202例接受直流电转复或导管消融的患者。平均年龄为67岁,30%为女性。大多数患者患有房颤(n = 179),其他患者患有房扑或两者皆有。ASTA症状量表中的9个项目之一显示模型拟合不理想,ASTA健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)量表中的13个项目中有2个不理想。两个量表均支持单维性。除量表下限外,目标定位尚可接受。两个量表在反应类别“相当多”和“很多”上均显示出阈值反转(ASTA症状中有8个,ASTA HRQoL项目中有12个)。两个量表均检测到一些局部依赖性问题。信度(个人分离指数)令人满意:ASTA症状量表为0.75,ASTA HRQoL量表为0.77。未检测到性别和年龄的项目功能差异。

结论

根据拉施模型,ASTA问卷的英文版本显示出令人满意的测量特性。然而,需要在其他心律失常患者中进行评估。在进一步验证中应考虑反应类别以及项目功能差异。ASTA问卷可用于评估心律失常患者不同年龄和性别组之间的症状和健康相关生活质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e93/9418394/09c2c8a6da00/41687_2022_493_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验