• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对瑞士生物银行数据管理和治理的偏好:一项全国性调查的结果。

Public preferences towards data management and governance in Swiss biobanks: results from a nationwide survey.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 26;12(8):e060844. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060844.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060844
PMID:36028266
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9422864/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This article aims to measure the willingness of the Swiss public to participate in personalised health research, and their preferences regarding data management and governance.

SETTING

Results are presented from a nationwide survey of members of the Swiss public.

PARTICIPANTS

15 106 randomly selected Swiss residents received the survey in September 2019. The response rate was 34.1% (n=5156). Respondent age ranged from 18 to 79 years, with fairly uniform spread across sex and age categories between 25 and 64 years.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Willingness to participate in personalised health research and opinions regarding data management and governance.

RESULTS

Most respondents preferred to be contacted and reconsented for each new project using their data (39%, 95% CI: 37.4% to 40.7%), or stated that their preference depends on the project type (29.4%, 95% CI: 27.9% to 31%). Additionally, a majority (52%, 95% CI: 50.3% to 53.8%) preferred their data or samples be stored anonymously or in coded form (43.4%, 95% CI: 41.7% to 45.1%). Of those who preferred that their data be anonymised, most also indicated a wish to be recontacted for each new project (36.8%, 95% CI: 34.5% to 39.2%); however, these preferences are in conflict. Most respondents desired to personally own their data. Finally, most Swiss respondents trust their doctors, along with researchers at universities, to protect their data.

CONCLUSION

Insight into public preference can enable Swiss biobanks and research institutions to create management and governance strategies that match the expectations and preferences of potential participants. Models allowing participants to choose how to interact with the process, while more complex, may increase individual willingness to provide data to biobanks.

摘要

目的

本文旨在衡量瑞士公众参与个性化健康研究的意愿,以及他们对数据管理和治理的偏好。

背景

研究结果来自于对瑞士公众的全国性调查。

参与者

2019 年 9 月,随机抽取了 15106 名瑞士居民参与调查。回复率为 34.1%(n=5156)。受访者年龄在 18 至 79 岁之间,25 至 64 岁之间的性别和年龄分布相当均匀。

主要和次要结果

参与个性化健康研究的意愿以及对数据管理和治理的看法。

结果

大多数受访者更倾向于通过他们的数据联系并重新同意每个新项目(39%,95%置信区间:37.4%至 40.7%),或者表示他们的偏好取决于项目类型(29.4%,95%置信区间:27.9%至 31%)。此外,大多数人(52%,95%置信区间:50.3%至 53.8%)更喜欢将他们的数据或样本匿名存储或编码存储(43.4%,95%置信区间:41.7%至 45.1%)。在那些希望数据匿名化的人中,大多数人也表示希望为每个新项目重新联系(36.8%,95%置信区间:34.5%至 39.2%);然而,这些偏好存在冲突。大多数受访者希望拥有自己的数据。最后,大多数瑞士受访者信任他们的医生以及大学的研究人员来保护他们的数据。

结论

了解公众的偏好可以使瑞士生物库和研究机构制定符合潜在参与者期望和偏好的管理和治理策略。允许参与者选择如何与该过程互动的模型虽然更加复杂,但可能会增加个人向生物库提供数据的意愿。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8b/9422864/eaaefb16a760/bmjopen-2022-060844f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8b/9422864/4ba300b0402a/bmjopen-2022-060844f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8b/9422864/50795f8da5a2/bmjopen-2022-060844f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8b/9422864/2d3c0d0b0b6f/bmjopen-2022-060844f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8b/9422864/eaaefb16a760/bmjopen-2022-060844f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8b/9422864/4ba300b0402a/bmjopen-2022-060844f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8b/9422864/50795f8da5a2/bmjopen-2022-060844f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8b/9422864/2d3c0d0b0b6f/bmjopen-2022-060844f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8b/9422864/eaaefb16a760/bmjopen-2022-060844f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Public preferences towards data management and governance in Swiss biobanks: results from a nationwide survey.公众对瑞士生物银行数据管理和治理的偏好:一项全国性调查的结果。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 26;12(8):e060844. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060844.
2
Public willingness to participate in personalized health research and biobanking: A large-scale Swiss survey.公众参与个性化健康研究和生物库的意愿:一项大规模的瑞士调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0249141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249141. eCollection 2021.
3
Willingness to participate in a personalized health cohort - insights from the swiss health study pilot phase.参与个性化健康队列研究的意愿——来自瑞士健康研究试点阶段的见解
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):2140. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19650-z.
4
Fair Shares and Sharing Fairly: A Survey of Public Views on Open Science, Informed Consent and Participatory Research in Biobanking.公平份额与公平分享:关于生物样本库中开放科学、知情同意和参与式研究的公众观点调查
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 8;10(7):e0129893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129893. eCollection 2015.
5
Willingness to share anonymised routinely collected clinical health data in Switzerland: a cross-sectional survey.瑞士民众愿意分享匿名常规临床健康数据:一项横断面调查。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2022 Jun 16;152:w30182. doi: 10.4414/smw.2022.w30182. eCollection 2022 Jun 20.
6
Associations between the Willingness to Donate Samples to Biobanks and Selected Psychological Variables.将样本捐赠给生物库的意愿与选定心理变量之间的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 23;19(5):2552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052552.
7
Trust and Support for Cancer Research Biobanks: Insights from Cancer Patients in Poland.对癌症研究生物样本库的信任与支持:来自波兰癌症患者的见解
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Jun 13;30:e944263. doi: 10.12659/MSM.944263.
8
Patients' Knowledge and Attitude Toward Biobanks in Eastern Morocco.摩洛哥东部的患者对生物库的认知和态度。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2020 Jun;18(3):189-195. doi: 10.1089/bio.2019.0047. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
9
Providing Personalised Nutrition: Consumers' Trust and Preferences Regarding Sources of Information, Service Providers and Regulators, and Communication Channels.提供个性化营养:消费者对信息来源、服务提供商、监管机构及沟通渠道的信任与偏好
Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(4):218-228. doi: 10.1159/000481357. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
10
Transparency About Governance Contributes to Biobanks' Trustworthiness: Call for Action.透明度有助于生物库的信誉:行动呼吁。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2021 Feb;19(1):83-85. doi: 10.1089/bio.2020.0057. Epub 2020 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Data Management in Biobanking: Strategies, Challenges, and Future Directions.生物样本库中的数据管理:策略、挑战与未来方向。
BioTech (Basel). 2024 Sep 2;13(3):34. doi: 10.3390/biotech13030034.
2
Willingness to participate in a personalized health cohort - insights from the swiss health study pilot phase.参与个性化健康队列研究的意愿——来自瑞士健康研究试点阶段的见解
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):2140. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19650-z.
3
Talking Ethics Early in Health Data Public Private Partnerships.在健康数据公私合作伙伴关系中尽早探讨伦理问题。

本文引用的文献

1
Sharing Government Health Data With the Private Sector: Community Attitudes Survey.与私营部门共享政府卫生数据:社区态度调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 1;23(10):e24200. doi: 10.2196/24200.
2
Trust and Trade-Offs in Sharing Data for Precision Medicine: A National Survey of Singapore.精准医疗数据共享中的信任与权衡:新加坡全国性调查
J Pers Med. 2021 Sep 16;11(9):921. doi: 10.3390/jpm11090921.
3
Public willingness to participate in personalized health research and biobanking: A large-scale Swiss survey.公众参与个性化健康研究和生物库的意愿:一项大规模的瑞士调查。
J Bus Ethics. 2024;190(3):649-659. doi: 10.1007/s10551-023-05425-w. Epub 2023 May 18.
4
Perspectives on Data Sharing in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤患者数据共享的观点
Neurotrauma Rep. 2023 Nov 9;4(1):781-789. doi: 10.1089/neur.2023.0035. eCollection 2023.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0249141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249141. eCollection 2021.
4
Can we know if donor trust expires? About trust relationships and time in the context of open consent for future data use.我们能否知道捐赠者的信任是否过期?关于开放同意未来数据使用的背景下的信任关系和时间。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Mar;48(3):184-188. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106244. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
5
Reporting Genetic Findings to Individual Research Participants: Guidelines From the Swiss Personalized Health Network.向个体研究参与者报告基因研究结果:瑞士个性化健康网络指南
Front Genet. 2020 Dec 11;11:585820. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.585820. eCollection 2020.
6
Sharing genomic data from clinical testing with researchers: public survey of expectations of clinical genomic data management in Queensland, Australia.与研究人员分享临床检测中的基因组数据:澳大利亚昆士兰州临床基因组数据管理期望的公众调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Nov 19;21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00563-6.
7
Transparency About Governance Contributes to Biobanks' Trustworthiness: Call for Action.透明度有助于生物库的信誉:行动呼吁。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2021 Feb;19(1):83-85. doi: 10.1089/bio.2020.0057. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
8
Global Public Perceptions of Genomic Data Sharing: What Shapes the Willingness to Donate DNA and Health Data?全球公众对基因组数据共享的看法:是什么影响了人们捐赠 DNA 和健康数据的意愿?
Am J Hum Genet. 2020 Oct 1;107(4):743-752. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.08.023. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
9
Public perceptions on data sharing: key insights from the UK and the USA.公众对数据共享的看法:来自英国和美国的关键见解。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Sep;2(9):e444-e446. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30161-8. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
10
Public trust and global biobank networks.公众信任与全球生物样本库网络
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Aug 15;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00515-0.